Archive for March, 2010

American Eagle-Mine

Question: What is the EU’s Lisbon Treaty and does it affect our own National Security?

This recent research report reveals the disturbing and/or shocking answer to this question-You Decide:

Heritage Foundation-Paul Rosenzweig

How the EU’s Lisbon Treaty Affects U.S. National SecurityPosted on The Heritage Foundation-By Paul Rosenzweig-On March 23, 2010:


These are pertinent excerpts from this research report:

Abstract: Yet another EU treaty has gone into effect. This time, it is the Treaty of Lisbon. All sorts of tedious rule changes will result, adding yet more layers of bureaucracy and confusion to the behemoth that is the European Union. Why should Americans care? Because embedded in all the bureaucratese and muddle of regulations is the more insidious element of anti-Americanism—which is leading the European Parliament to dispose of policies that have been essential in fighting terrorism around the world. One of those policies, the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program, was a highly successful data-sharing agreement between the EU and the U.S. The European Parliament’s first act under Lisbon was to reject that agreement, effectively turning the EU into a safe haven for terror-supporting bankers. More disastrous decisions may well follow—many of which will have a damaging effect on U.S. national security.

December 1, 2009, was an unremarkable day in America: Congress was mired in a protracted health care debate; the Christmas Day bomb plot was still 24 days away; and the most pressing foreign policy issues faced by the Obama Administration were those connected to the war in Afghanistan.

Few, then, would think of December 1 as a problematic day for American security. But it was. One of the most significant events affecting American security passed, almost without notice, on the other side of the Atlantic when the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force.[1]

The Lisbon Treaty creates new institutions in the European Union, changes voting rules to eliminate the requirement for unanimity among the European member states, and shifts the allocation of power among European institutions, giving a powerful role to the European Parliament in security matters. Lisbon will create a sea change in the operation of the EU, a development that Europeans have long anticipated. What is unanticipated, however, is how much this latest EU treaty will affect the United States of America.

An early example: For the eight years since 9/11, the United States has been exchanging financial and banking data with European countries under the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP). This data has let the U.S. government track down terrorist finances and has played a role in disrupting terrorist attacks on both sides of the Atlantic. According to the U.S. Department of Treasury, more than 1,500 different terror cases were opened thanks to leads from this EU–U.S. data-sharing program.[2]

In February, in its first act under the new treaty, the European Parliament (which until now never had a role in security matters) rejected this information-sharing agreement. The Treasury Department has already stopped receiving information about terrorist finances, and the European Union is now, in effect, a safe haven for terrorist bankers.[3]

“Justice and Home Affairs” Before Lisbon:

From its small beginnings in 1957, the European Union has grown into a powerful colossus. The EU now has 27 member states, and spans the distance from Ireland to Bulgaria. As it has grown, the ability for building consensus has diminished. Where once it was comparatively easy to find agreement among six or 10 states with a common heritage, the EU’s 27 actors have so many cultural and political histories, that consensus is becoming ever more elusive.

As the European Union approached the 21st century, it sported a veneer that looked almost like a federalist system to an American observer. Some powers (mostly in the economic arena) were exercised principally by a centralized executive (the European Commission) in Brussels. Other powers, mostly those relating to foreign and defense policy and to law enforcement, were mostly exercised at the state level, except when the states let Brussels take the lead. From the American perspective that is a skewed form of federalism—akin to Washington having no foreign or defense policy role, but a paramount economic authority. More and more, European federalism means centralization of power, while American federalism means devolvement of authority. But the contours were similar—a debate between a central government striving for control and constituent states resisting that impulse.

Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) is the European Union’s name for areas of law and policy that Americans think of as law enforcement, homeland security (“internal security” in the EU), and counterterrorism. Pre-Lisbon, JHA issues were, presumptively, the responsibility of each independent sovereign nation that is a member of the EU. The United Kingdom set British police policy; Germany set police policy for its own citizens. That presumption of individual state action could be overcome only with the unanimous agreement of all 27 members of the union. What this meant is that collective action did occur, but only when there was a manifest reason for it. Examples include supranational organizations like Europol (a Europe-wide police agency), Eurojust (a Europe-wide prosecutorial organization), and Frontex (the European border security coordination agency). These organizations have addressed areas where a common European policy would be useful—adopting common rules for warrants and extradition, for instance. Because of the unanimity requirement, Europe-wide action was often slow and incremental, and America, more frequently, relied on cooperation with individual—sovereign—countries to achieve U.S. law enforcement and counterterrorism objectives.

In part to resolve its own federalism concerns over member-state independence and to increase efficiency, the EU has now adopted the Treaty of Lisbon. The treaty was also motivated by a desire to enforce pan-European discipline on “external matters” (what the EU calls its foreign policy) and to create more supranational coordination. The skeptical observer might say that the Lisbon Treaty is about centralizing power in Brussels and limiting dissent from decisions made by the ruling elites.

Whatever its motivation, the effects of Lisbon are clear: The treaty is a further step on the road to more centralization of power in Brussels, particularly in the area of Justice and Home Affairs. How far the de jure changes will be followed by significant de facto changes remains to be seen, but there can be little doubt that Lisbon is intended to make collective action at the European level easier—with a concomitant reduction in the authority of individual sovereign nations.

The Treaty of Lisbon:

Under the Lisbon Treaty, the European Union’s approach to security issues will change in at least two significant ways. First, the European Council (the body in which each member nation has a single vote) will be authorized to act under a more majoritarian rule (not a simple majority system but one with weighted voting) and unanimity will no longer be required. Second, the council, which used to act alone, will now share decision-making power with the members of the European Parliament (composed of elected representatives from the 27 EU members).[4] In the near term, the changes are likely to be relatively modest; in the long run they are likely to be profound, with significant effects on the trans-Atlantic relationship.

The changes mean that the legislative process for Justice and Home Affairs issues will be completely revised. Before Lisbon, unanimity was required in the European Council to adopt an EU-wide measure relating to Justice and Home Affairs. Now, matters will proceed differently, through two processes known as qualified voting majority (QVM) and co-decision—which are part of the EU’s normal legislative process for economic affairs.

Qualified voting majority, as its name implies, means that unanimity of all 27 countries within the European Council will no longer be required for the EU to act collectively on JHA matters. Instead, each member country will cast a ballot that is “weighted” roughly in proportion to its population. The majority requirement (to achieve a majority of the weighted votes) is further “qualified” by a distribution requirement: In order to pass, a proposal must be approved by 55 percent of the 27 individual countries (that is, 15 of them). Furthermore, those 15 countries combined must be home to at least 65 percent of the total European population.[5] Despite the complexity of the voting system (which makes America’s senatorial filibuster seem like a kindergarten exercise), the end result is clear: A working majority of the EU member states is now authorized to create supranational policy on matters of law enforcement and homeland security in situations where, previously, unanimity was required. Minority states that do not agree will now be bound to follow the EU lead.[6]

Before Lisbon, the European Parliament had little authority in areas of Justice and Home Affairs. The parliament’s pronouncements were mostly viewed as advisory and hortatory. As a consequence, many American observers perceived the parliament as irrelevant and it often acted irresponsibly (much as with the U.S. Congress when its votes do not matter, such as when it votes to condemn a foreign country for belligerent acts, or institutes a ban that the President has the power to waive).

Now, the rules of co-decision will greatly increase the power of the European Parliament. Where, previously, the council was merely obliged to “consult” with the parliament, initiatives proposed by the council must now be affirmatively adopted by the legislature. Without parliament’s review and approval, no new European initiative can proceed. In effect, the parliament has gained a great deal of new power to control the Justice and Home Affairs operations of the EU.

These changes in decision-making authority will apply to a broad range of EU activities. The new non-unanimity and co-decision procedures will apply to visa regulations, immigration law and policy, judicial cooperation in criminal matters, the operation of Eurojust and Europol, and cross-border police cooperation. Asylum policy and illegal immigration will remain areas where qualified majority and co-decision apply.[7]

In addition to these changes in decision-making powers, the Lisbon Treaty also affects judicial review. Pre-Lisbon, Justice and Home Affairs matters were generally considered questions of domestic law, subject to review by the courts of each member state. Now, to the extent that these JHA matters become the subject of EU legislation, they will also be subject to review by the European Court of Justice (ECJ)–adding yet another centralizing layer of authority to domestic practices. Indeed, the ECJ has a mandate to foster an “ever closer union,” so its rulings inevitably favor increased centralization. Like the U.S. Supreme Court, the ECJ has not historically proven shy about exercising its powers of review.

Finally, Lisbon establishes a new standing committee within the European Council on issues relating to internal security, as the Committee on Internal Security (COSI).[8] The new committee will attempt to strengthen coordination among the member states on issues of police and customs cooperation, border security, and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. While COSI will not make legislative proposals directly, it seems likely that it will influence the European Council in developing more pan-European approaches to law enforcement and homeland security.

The Changing EU:

What does all this mean for the European Union? The procedural changes that are a result of the Lisbon Treaty are immense. It will take a great deal of time simply to create and staff the new institutions called for in the treaty. Symbolizing the difficulty in transitioning to a new legal regime, the provisions of the treaty that give the commission and the Court of Justice authority over police matters and judicial cooperation in criminal matters will not take effect until December 2014.[9]

Even after the new treaty institutions are created and staffed, it remains to be seen how much true authority they will have. Though the intention of the treaty is clearly to centralize more decision-making authority in Brussels, the ability to exercise that authority will take time to develop. The promise of a greater, more active European Union with the capacity to be a full partner in counterterrorism looks likely to be delayed for quite some time.

It is often said that in Europe very little is accomplished unless the “big” countries—Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the U.K.—want it done. It seems unlikely that the QVM voting system will change that. What will change—what already has changed—is the enhanced role of the European Parliament. In the past the parliament’s strident anti-American tone and aversion to necessary security measures has been an annoyance, causing little real damage. The lack of an effective vote fostered a fairly strong mindset in opposition to EU-wide security matters within the parliament. Often this opposition was couched as an objection to the growing EU security state, and several members of the European Parliament have gained a small following as “defenders of freedom.” But it does not appear that granting greater authority to the parliament will cause it to moderate its sometimes overbearing tone. On the contrary, if the terrorist-financing debacle is any measure, it appears that the EU parliamentarians will now interpose their objections to increased security measures with greater success.

The real test of the European Parliament’s seriousness will come soon. In 2007, the United States and the EU entered into the Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreement on sharing airline passenger information.[10] The U.S. has used passenger names to stop terrorists from entering the U.S.,[11] and, most recently, used PNR data as a factor in the arrest of Najibullah Zazi in September 2009 for his part in the New York subway bombing plot—Zazi travelled frequently to Pakistan.[12] It is safe to say that these PNR records form one of the lynchpins of U.S. national security.

Even though the PNR agreement was signed long before the Lisbon Treaty took effect, under pre-Lisbon law, the agreement had to be ratified by the national legislatures of all 27 countries. As the clock struck midnight on November 30, 2007, only 24 of the 27 countries had ratified the agreement (despite having two years to do so) and under the new Lisbon-based law, the agreement must be considered by the European Parliament.

The same legislators who killed the TFTP were vociferous opponents of the PNR agreement—and will now have a say in whether the agreement is formally adopted. If, as seems possible, these legislators reject the considered judgment of the European Commission and 24 national parliaments in favor of their own idiosyncratic views, it is fair to say that a trans-Atlantic crisis over counterterrorism cooperation and information-sharing may result. The Obama Administration would be wise to prepare for the worst and develop policy options for continuing the vital flow of information from the EU to American security agencies even in the face of European resistance.

Protecting America:

What does all this mean for the trans-Atlantic relationship? Only time will tell. But some of the contours of the steps America will need to take are becoming clearer. The Administration should:

Work with Brussels to the extent it aids American interests. It is possible that the new EU power structure may make the EU a more effective partner for the U.S. in the long run. If the QVM process energizes European action and the parliamentary co-decision rule does not become an obstacle, the strengthening of Brussels may work in America’s favor by providing America with a strong counterterrorism partner capable of acting on behalf of Europe. If—and only if—it does, the U.S. should welcome that development.

Maintain traditional relationships. Until Brussels proves itself a suitable partner for counterterrorism collaboration, the U.S. cannot permit the strengthening of the EU to challenge the United States’ long-standing bilateral relationships with the sovereign countries of the EU. As it stands today (given the sentiment in parliament), the U.S. is more likely to achieve its political objectives with the assistance of traditional friends than by working with the new EU institutions. As Henry Kissinger said: “When the United States deals with the nations of Europe individually, it has the possibility of consulting at many levels and to have its view heard well before a decision is taken. In dealing with the European Union, by contrast, the United States is excluded from the decision-making process and interacts only after the event…. Growing estrangement between America and Europe is thus being institutionally fostered.”[13]

Focus efforts on those EU countries that have the capacity to work effectively with the U.S. Europe will never develop a coherent supranational police force or a supranational intelligence community with whom their American equivalents can interact. Nor is it likely that the U.S. would welcome that sort of development. Thus, for practical reasons, the U.S. should continue the exchange of information and operational assistance with EU member states and their justice and home affairs services.

Insist on American interests. It will be tempting to try to avoid a fight over European complaints about information-sharing and counterterrorism collaboration. Those instincts might cause America’s policymakers to compromise and accept restrictions on American counterterrorism efforts that place American interests at risk. They should resist that impulse. The anti-security members of the European Parliament cannot be appeased. The U.S. should insist on defining its own interests, and its diplomacy should reflect those security concerns.

In the longer term, the Treaty of Lisbon signals a clear commitment by the EU to increased Europeanization of issues traditionally thought of as state and local powers. The first steps on that road have been rough, and the prospects for improved U.S.– EU cooperation on counterterrorism measures are uncertain. America will have to pay attention to these trends, or risk letting changes in Europe adversely affect America’s own national security.


[1] Lisbon Treaty, December 13, 2007, at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:SOM:EN:HTML (March 15, 2010).

[2]Ellen Nakashima, “U.S. Criticizes EU Rejection of Agreement that Would Help Track Suspected Terrorists,” The Washington Post, February 12, 2010, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/11/AR2010021102139.html (March 15, 2010). The Post has editorialized against the parliament’s effective shutdown of the TFTP: “Swift Rebuke,” The Washington Post, March 1, 2010, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/28/AR2010022803429.html (March 15, 2010). Besides being shortsighted, the parliament’s vote was also a calculated anti-American slap, coming immediately after a direct appeal from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner: Letter from Clinton and Geithner to Jerzy Buzek, president of the European Parliament, February 5, 2010, at http://www.europolitics.info/pdf/gratuit_en/266006-en.pdf (March 15, 2010).

[3]In a separate paper my colleague Sally McNamara has detailed how the new treaty has also created confusion and problems in the area of foreign affairs: “EU Foreign Policymaking Post-Lisbon: Confused and Contrived,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 2388, March 16, 2010, at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/03/EU-Foreign-Policymaking-Post-Lisbon-Confused-and-Contrived.

[4]As a matter of form, the Lisbon Treaty does not serve as a stand-alone separate treaty. Rather, its provisions are in the nature of amendments to the existing treaties of Rome and Maastricht that form the basis of the European Union’s structure. These Lisbon amendments have been consolidated with the old treaties into a single new, unified treaty, The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and citations to provisions implementing changes called for in the Lisbon Treaty are commonly made to the new consolidated TFEU (for simplicity’s sake, “Lisbon Treaty” will be used for the citations). Thus, Justice and Home Affairs matters are now covered in Arts. 67–89 of the Lisbon Treaty (freedom, security and justice) and Art. 196 of the Lisbon Treaty (civil protection).

[5]The QVM system is extremely complex, requiring a special “voting calculator.” See “Voting Calculator: Use it to Simulate Council Voting,” Council of the European Union, at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/App/calculette/default.aspx?lang=en&cmsid=1690 (March 15, 2010).

[6]Minority states have a right of resistance. They can exercise a “qualified veto” on EU proposals. If a proposal passed by the council and the parliament is subsequently rejected by one-third of the parliaments of the member states, the council must reconsider the proposition.

[7]Lisbon Treaty, Arts. 77–88.

[8]Lisbon Treaty, Art. 71.

[9]Lisbon Treaty, Art. 10 of Protocol 36. The United Kingdom has reserved the right to opt out of these provisions completely. For those who wish to understand the many political compromises that were necessary to bring the Lisbon Treaty to fruition, see the 37 separate protocols (each modifying a treaty element in some way): “Protocols,” Official Journal of the European Union, May 9, 2008, at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:115:0201:0328:EN:PDF (March 15, 2010).

[10]Council of the European Union, “Agreement Between the European Union and the United States of America on the Processing and Transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) Data by Air Carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS),” June 28, 2007, at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2007/jul/eu-usa-pnr-agreement-2007.pdf (March 12, 2010).

[11]A study of one case, involving a man named Ra’ed al-Banna, can be found in Stewart A. Baker and Nathan Alexander Sales, “Homeland Security, Information Policy, and the Transatlantic Alliance,” George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper No. 09–20, March 17, 2009, at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1361943 (March 15, 2010). See also The Man Turned Away, PBS Frontline, October 10, 2006.

[12]For example, the Department of Justice’s Motion for a Permanent Order of Detention cites Customs and Border Protection records of trips to Pakistan. Memorandum of Law in Support of the Government’s Motion for a Permanent Order of Detention at 3–4, United States v. Najibullah Zazi, No. 09-CR-663, September 24, 2009, at http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/zazi-detention-memo.pdf (March 15, 2010).

[13]Henry Kissinger, Does America Need a Foreign Policy? (New York: Free Press, 2001), p. 57.

Paul Rosenzweig is the Principal at Red Branch Consulting, PLLC, and a Visiting Fellow at The Heritage Foundation. He is a former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy at the Department of Homeland Security.”

American Eagle-Mine

Question: After reading this eye-opening research report and witnessing the unquestionable transformation of our country since President Obama’s inauguration, did you get a sense that our President and the majority in Congress are covertly adopting elements of the EU’s Treaty of Lisbon (e.g., legislative process, limiting state or local powers, etc.), as evidenced by the disgusting process utilized by them to pass a Healthcare Bill that literally hijacks those state or local government sovereign powers outlined in our Constitution?

American Eagle-Mine

Note: These recent articles and/or blog posts relate to the above research report-You Decide:

Merkel Is Ready to Sell Out Germany to the NOW!-Posted on Bloomberg News-By Patrick Donahue-On November 18, 2011:


US elections 2012: American liberals are praying that Europe will save Barack Obama!Posted on The Telegraph-By Nile Gardiner-On September 29, 2011:


Europe could decide the 2012 election!Posted on The Washington Post-By Ezra Klein, The Washington Post-On September 28, 2011:


Why Have European Countries Succumbed To Governance By The EU?Posted on Post & Email-by Don Hank, blogging at Laigle’s Forum-On February 9, 2011:


President’s panel may consider VAT taxPosted on USAToday.com-On April 8, 2010:


In Medicine, the Power of NoPosted on The New York Times-By DAVID LEONHARDT-On April 6, 2010:


Morning Bell: Welcome to the Obama Dependency EconomyPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 2, 2010:


Morning Bell: One Nation Under ArrestPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 31, 2010:


It Was A Republic, But We Couldn’t Keep ItPosted on Liberty Alert-By Bob Livingston-On March 29, 2010:


Poll: Almost Two-Thirds of U.S. Oppose Health LawPosted on NewsMax.com-By Dan Well-On March 31, 2010:


Obama Medicare pick urges ‘radical transfer of power’: “Claims U.S. system measures patients’ quality of care by ‘color of their skin’”Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 29, 2010:


American Eagle-Mine

Note: This research report and articles relate to and/or support my blog posts-You Decide:

It has begun: Our current financial situation was not bred out of incompetence, but by design!


Europe’s Looming Demise: Changes on the Continent Cloud Our Future!


Is Obama The Greatest Strategic Disaster For Israel?


Supreme Court to Strike Down Obamacare!


Will The New START Undermine Our Nuclear Security?


The Reason for the Treason!


Who’s Behind the Financial Crisis?


Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?


Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!


Where Is America Today?


Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!


Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!


A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:


“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question: Could it be true that the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and Joint Terrorism Task Force have recently conducted militia group raids in Michigan, Indiana and Ohio?

The following article and/or blog post reveals the disturbing answer to this question-You Decide:

Massive Federal Raid in Lenawee County!Posted on ABC Action 7 News Detroit wxyz.com-On March 28, 2010:


These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“ADRIAN, Mich. (WXYZ) – The FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the Joint Terrorism Task Force are all involved in raids around Adrian that may be connected to a militia group.

The FBI conducted multiple raids throughout Saturday and into Sunday, with one of them centered on a property where known members of a militia live. The land is owned by a man who lives in a house on the property. His sons live in two mobile homes that are also on the property. Saturday’s raids were concentrated on those mobile homes.

Helicopters were spotted in the sky for much of the night, and agents set up checkpoints throughout the area, including in Sand Creek and Clayton in Lenawee County. Witnesses tell Action News that it was like a small army had descended on the area.

A command center, including two satellite trucks and a radio tower, had been set up at the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Department in Ann Arbor. It has since been dismantled.

Federal agents will not comment on the investigation, only saying that they are serving a number of search warrants and that the warrants are sealed. Action News has learned that an unknown number of arrests have also been made. An unconfirmed report indicated that at least six people were arrested coming into Michigan from Ohio.

Members of a number of militia groups say that the raids are connected to raids in Indiana and Ohio. However, the FBI has not confirmed that.”

Note:  Lets hope and pray that these agencies are also conducting raids on numerous other Muslim terrorist organizations and/or training camps that have been discovered inside our U.S. borders, as revealed in the following eye-opening investigative report conducted by the Director of the Northeast Intelligence Network and other reports, articles and/or blog posts-You Decide:

NWO-Jihadist Training Camps in America and Islamic Flag Over White HouseJihadist Training Camps in America and Islamic Flag Over White House!-Posted on Godfather Politics-By Gary Demar-On August 9, 2014:


Islam-New terror compound found in heart of Texas

NEW TERROR COMPOUND FOUND IN HEART OF TEXAS: ‘Muslims shoot firearms ‘without interference from law enforcement’!Posted on WND.com-By ART MOORE-On February 18, 2014:


Iran-For The Record- Sleeper Cells Inside Our Nation

For The Record: Sleeper Cells Inside Our Nation?Posted on The Blaze-By Sara Carter-On February 19, 2014:


Iran-For The Record- Sleeper Cells Inside Our Nation

Do your own homework: For The Record’s research for ‘Sleeper Cell’!Posted on The Blaze-By Tom Orr-On February 19, 2014:



JIHADIS TRAINING IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? ‘Investigators describes setup as infrastructure for attack!’Posted on WND.com-On January 4, 2012:



35 TERROR TRAINING CAMPS NOW OPERATING INSIDE U.S.: ‘Government does nothing to impede expansion of ‘Soldiers of Allah’ network!’Posted on WND-On January 2, 2011:


Jihad-Muslim Jihad Vs. American Perversion

Muslim Terrorist Training Camps in North America: “New report of radical, anti-U.S. Islamic centers confirms our 2004-05 findings”!Posted on Northeast Intelligence Network-By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director:


Jihad-Muslim Brotherhood’s Terror Training Camps Inside The USA

Muslim Brotherhood’s Terror Training Camps Inside The USA!Posted on Polical Vel Craft-On January 30, 2011:



35 jihad training compounds on American soil!Posted on JihadWatch.org-By Robert-On February 9, 2009:


Jihad-Terror Training Camps On American Soil

Terror Training Camps On American Soil!Posted on HumanEvents.com-By Robert Spencer-On February 19, 2009:


Congressional Research Center

CRS Report for Congress (RL32223.pdf): “Foreign Terrorist Organizations”!Completed by Audrey Kurth Cronin, Specialist in Terrorism, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division and Huda Aden, Adam Frost, and Benjamin Jones, Research Associates, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division-On February 6, 2004:


Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and/or support the above articles and/or blog posts and videos-You Decide:  

Video: DHS Continues To Target Conservatives, Ignore Islamists!Posted on Western Journalism-By DANIEL NOE-On July 10, 2012:


Mich. militia members cleared of charges that accused them of plotting war against government!-Posted on The Washington Post-By The Associated Press-On March 28, 2012:


Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home!Posted on NWI.com-By Dan Carden-On May 13, 2011:


FBI warns letters to governors could stir violencePosted on Yahoo News-By EILEEN SULLIVAN and DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writer-On April 2, 2010:


Feds: Militia plotted for anti-government revoltPosted on Yahoo News-By JOHN SEEWER, Associated Press Writer-On March 30, 2010:


FBI: Last of 9 suspects in plot caught in Mich.Posted on Google.com-By JOHN SEEWER, Associated Press Write-On March 29, 2010:


9 militia members charged in police-killing plotPosted on Yahoo News-By COREY WILLIAMS and DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writers-On March 29, 2010:


War on Terror Update: “Just 35% Say U.S. Safer Today Than Before 9/11”Posted on RasmussenReports.com-On March 24, 2010:


Note: My following blogs relate to and/or support the above articles, blogs, reports and videos-You Decide:

What was the true intent of Operation Closed Campus?


It’s Getting Very Serious Now!


Another Imminent Homeland & National Security Issue!


Shocking New Report! Obama’s Real Terrorists: Targeting Patriots and The Right!


Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!


The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!


Does Our President Hate America?


What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!


Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?


Are Intelligence Personnel Empowered to Employ Their Ingenuity and Resourcefulness to Connect The Dots?


Could Steps That Team Obama Has Taken Be Emboldening Terrorists?


Is President Obama’s Shameful Politics Harming The CIA?


Top Intelligence Republican: Obama: ‘Ready, Fire, Aim’!


Why Should Terrorists Be Given The Extraordinary Protections That You and I Have As American Citizens?


When Did the American People Elect Eric Holder Commander in Chief?


Obama and Holder’s Hidden Agenda!


Democrats Covertly Target CIA and Intelligence Community Officers!


Did Obama’s New OIC Envoy Defend Activist Who Aided Terrorist Group?


Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!


Is U.S. Negotiating with the Taliban?


Is Our Government Seriously Misreading Al-Qaida’s Operational Objectives?


What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and Is It Something That We Should Know More About?


Isn’t It About Time to Add Venezuela to The U.S. List of State Sponsors of Terrorism?


The Obama Administration Allows Tariq Ramadan To Travel To The U.S.!


The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!


What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?


How Much Longer Will We Be “Allowed” To Keep Our Guns?


Is Obama Employing the Cloward-Piven Strategy?


Backsliding On National Security: The Immigration Connection:


Europe’s Looming Demise: Changes on the Continent Cloud Our Future!


Rules of Engagement Killing Marines and U.S. Soldiers!


Radical Movement’s Leader Forecasts America’s Demise!


Is Being An Empathetic Liberal Minority The New Prerequisite for Being a Supreme Court Justice?


NYC Police: Terror Suspects Wanted To Commit jihad!


Does Human Rights Law Apply to Terrorists?


“Ayer Head” Professor Defends Terrorist Ayers!


High Level Pentagon Official Blames U.S. For Al-Qaeda Attacks!


Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!


Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government-Why?


Ongoing Concerns With This President and His Administration!


Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:


Where Is America Today?


Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!


Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!


A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:


“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question:   Could it be true that President Obama is the greatest strategic disaster for Israel?

The following article and/or blog post reveals the eye-opening answer to this question-You Decide:

Israel Media Attacks Netanyahu; He Denies ‘Obama a Disaster’Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On March 28, 2010:


These are pertinent excerpts from this article and/or blog post:

“(IsraelNN.com) Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu vehemently denied Sunday morning that an aide commented, “We’ve got a real problem. You could say that Obama is the greatest disaster for Israel — a strategic disaster.”

The alleged comment was headlined by Israel’s largest daily, Yediot Acharonot, which also operates the Ynet website and has been a long-time foe of the Prime Minister while championing parties that favor eliminating a Jewish presence in most of Judea and Samaria.

Along with the left-wing Haaretz newspaper, the two publications have published an onslaught of articles against Prime Minister Netanyahu’s refusal to follow U.S.

President Barack Obama’s demand for a total building freeze for Jews in areas of Jerusalem that the United States recognizes as “occupied.”

The Prime Minister’s office rejected the comment as the Cabinet met for its weekly meeting, but the damage had been done, hitting the headlines in American media. A statement issued by Netanyahu’s office said, “The Prime Minister emphatically rejects the anonymous quotes about President Obama that a newspaper attributed to one of his confidantes, and he condemns them.”

Prime Minister Netanyahu told reporters at the beginning of the Cabinet session, “I have heard over recent days anonymous and improper remarks in the media about the U.S. administration and American president. I want to say clearly, these comments are unacceptable to me. They do not come from anyone representing me.

“The relations between Israel and the United States are those of allies and friends, and are based on tradition spanning many years.”

The Obama-Netanyahu meeting in the White House last week was headlined for its protocol as well as content. There was no press conference and no public handshake, indicating to virtually all journalists that President Obama was publicly snubbing Prime Minister Netanyahu for his stand against the State Department’s and president’s views on the status of Jerusalem. The American position is almost totally in line with that of the Palestinian Authority, which demands sovereignty over all of Jerusalem that was restored to Israel in the Six Day War of 1967.

Most analysts, as well as the American government, have rejected notions that President Obama is trying to undermine the Netanyahu government and bring about a new coalition led by Kadima, headed by Tzipi Livni. However, the media attacks on the government are fodder for further attempts to isolate the government in the eyes of the media and the international community.

The Haaretz newspaper, on an almost daily basis, has published articles that call President Obama a “friend” and ridicule Israeli policy on a Jewish presence in all of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria.

It also has run at least three polls to show opposition to the Likud coalition that includes relatively nationalist parties.

After publishing a pro-Obama J Street poll, Haaretz posted a survey on Sunday that revealed that 51 percent of Israelis are dissatisfied with the Prime Minister, indicating they favor Obama’s position.  However, the Independent Media Review and Analysis (IMRA) noted that some of those who had a negative view of Netanyahu include those who are against a freeze of construction in Jerusalem and who want him to take a stronge stand.

Other results of the poll also contradict the impression that a majority are unhappy with his policy. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents said they were satisfied with Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin, a long-time supporter of Netanyahu, while only 20 percent were not satisfied.

In addition, the respondents were split on Labor party chairman and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, while the published results of the Haaretz poll did not include Livni. Previous polls have shown widespread disappointment with her Kadima party leadership.”

Note:  What follows is an eye-opening article and/or blog post that reveals President Obama and George Soros’s plan to create a “Palestine State”-You Decide:

Obama, Soros create ‘Palestine’: ‘Invest in Arab ‘country’ that lacks recognition’Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On February 11, 2011:


Note:   What follows are numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to and/or support the above articles and/or blog posts-You Decide:  

Obama and Biden Indicted by Florida Grand Jury For Willfully Releasing Classified National Security Information!Posted on Obama Ballot Challenge-by GeorgeM-On October 30, 2012:


‘The Americans Ambushed Us’Posted on NationFoxNews.com-By Jeffrey Heller, Reuters-On May 22, 2011:


Obama’s AIPAC comments can’t conceal mutual mistrust, say Israeli analystsPosted on The Christian Science Monitor-By Joshua Mitnick, Correspondent-On May 22, 2011:


MK Katz Warns AIPAC, ‘Obama Put a Gun to Israel’s Head’Posted on Israel National News-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On May 22, 2011:


Egypt: Islamic supremacist presidential candidate says “the path to world freedom is the destruction of Israel”Posted on Jihad Watch-By Frank Scarn-On May 21, 2011:


Video: Why Israel Mustn’t Retreat To Its Pre ’67 borders!Posted on YouTube.com-By shaharclips-On May 21, 2011:


Video: Netanyahu speaks from Oval OfficePosted on YouTube.com-By blazevid-On May 20, 2011:


Hamas MP: The Jews Were Brought to Palestine for the “Great Massacre”Posted on YouTube.com-By MEMRITVVideos-On May 17, 2011:


Obama Middle East Speech: A Big and Revealing Mistake That Nobody Has NoticedPosted on Pajamas Media-By Barry Rubin-On May 20, 2011:


Video: Give Me Osama, I’ll Give you the JewsPosted on YouTube.com-By ATLAHWorldwide-On Nov 12, 2008:


Obama’s Abandonment of AmericaPosted on Big Peace-By Caroline Glick-On May 20, 2011:


Video: ‘Today I Speak From My Heart’ Obama’s Guarantee To Never Divide JerusalemPosted on YouTube.com-By NakedEmperorNews1-On May 20, 2011:


Netanyahu Rejects Obama Call for Palestinian State Based on 1967 BordersPosted on FoxNews.com-By The Associated Press-On May 19, 2011:


Flag & General Officers Support Israel!Posted on The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Report #: 976)-On April 2, 2011:


Lieberman Calls Parts of Obama’s Speech ‘Profoundly Ill-Advised’Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By Naftali Bendavid-On May 20, 2011:


Hatch condemns Obama’s stance on Israel border, plans disapproval measurePosted on The Hill-By Daniel Strauss-On May 20, 2011:


Allen West: Obama’s Recognition of Pre-1967 Borders ‘Beginning of the End’ for Jewish State-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Newsmax Wires-On May 19, 2011:


Obama Risks Losing Jewish Voters After Backing Key Palestinian Statehood DemandPosted on FoxNews.com-On May 19, 2011:


Obama: Palestinian State Must Be Based on 1967 BordersPosted on FoxNews.com-By The Associated Press-On May 19, 2011:


Equal Rights or Equal Rites?Posted on Nationa Review Online- By Paul Marshall-On May 19, 2011:


Yes, Jews Are the Chosen People: ‘For good or ill’Posted on National Review Online-By DENNIS PRAGER-On May 17, 2011:


Hamas Cleric: The Jews Will Be Annihilated & Palestine Will Be Capital Of New CalipatePosted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On May 17, 2011:


Next Arab Facebook Campaign: Get Millions to Invade IsraelPosted on Israel National News-By Chana Ya’ar-On March 30, 2011:


Is Hillary Encouraging Terror Against Jews?Posted on Israel National News-On March 14, 2011:


Obama Turns His Back on IsraelPosted on National Review Online-By Mitt Romney-On February 18, 2011:


In sharp reversal, U.S. agrees to rebuke Israel in Security Council-Posted on Turtle Bay-By Colum Lynch-On February 16, 2011:


“Obama Most Radical President ever” states famous Harvard PhdPosted on YouTube.com-By ussecuritycouncil-On June 22, 2010:


Martin Peretz: Obama ‘Close to Betrayal’Posted on NewsMax.com-By Jim Meyers-On January 31, 2011:


Israelis, Palestinians: Obama Is the ProblemPosted on NewsMax.com-On November 22, 2010:


Eric Cantor Flexes Muscles for IsraelPosted on Israel National News-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On November 14, 2010:


Netanyahu Presents US Demand for 3-Month FreezePosted on Israel National News-By Hillel Fendel-On November 14, 2010:


Obama Knocks Israel in a Budding Sharia State: ‘The president criticizes the Jewish state in a Muslim state that bans Israelis.’Posted on National Review Online-By ANDREW C. McCARTHY-On November 13, 2010:


After Obama Criticizes Israel, Palestinians Push for Urgent U.N. Security Council Meeting-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On November 11, 2010:


With Obama, the Future of Israel Looks BleakPosted on NewsMax.com-By Frank Gaffney-On October 29, 2010:


US Senate Backs Netanyahu, Asks Obama to Pressure AbbasPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On September 27, 2010:


Israel Delegation No-Show for Obama UN AddressPosted on Vision to America-On September 23, 2010:


Obama makes rare church appearance on same day as pro-Palestinian teaching?Posted on Israel Today-On September 21, 2010:


Obama Urges Israel to Extend Settlement Moratorium-Posted on The New York Times-By HELENE COOPER-On September 10, 2010:


Report: US to Continue Supplying Lebanon with ArmsPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Gil Ronen-On September 5, 2010:


Report: Iran Needs Year to Develop Nuclear WeaponPosted on NewsMax.com-On August 20, 2010:


Israeli Expert: Iran’s a Threat, But Not ReactorPosted on NewsMax.com-By Dan Weil-On August 19, 2010:


Netanyahu, the anti-ObamaPosted on The Washington Post-By George F. Will-On August 12, 2010:


Israeli Concern Prompts Modification of US-Saudi DealPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Elad Benari-On August 10, 2010:


Iran Unveils New Submarines and Makes More Persian Gulf WarningsPosted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough, International Editor-On August 09, 2010:


Israel Objects to U.S. Supplying Weapons to Lebanon’s National Army-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough, International Editor-On August 04, 2010:


US Insists ‘No Change in PA Status’ Despite Flag WavingPosted IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On July 25, 2010:


Obama Names Medicaid Chief Who Backs Anti-Israel DoctorsPosted on IsraelNationaNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On July 25, 2010:


Mideast Analyst Reilly: Radical Islamists Block PeacePosted on NewsMax.com-By John Rossomando-On July 7, 2010:


‘Obama Appears Detached from Israel’ says Former US Negotiator-Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On July 6, 2010:


Obama Pressures Israel to Apologize to Turkey For Defending Itself From Terrorist FlotillaPosted on ImpeachObamaCampaign.com-By Patrick-On July 6, 2010:


B’tselem Report Timed to Sabotage Netanyahu-Obama MeetingPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hillel Fendel-On July 5, 2010:


Saudi Denies Telling Obama Iran and Israel Should not ExistPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On July 4, 2010:


Yale Fellow “Obama Most Radical US President Ever”Posted on NewZeal.blogpost.com-By TREVOR LOUDON-On June 29, 2010:


Bill Clinton: Iran Poses ‘Suitcase Nuke’ Threat-Posted on NewsMax.com-On June 27, 2010:


Israeli Ambassador Obama Pushing Two Nations ApartPosted on NewsMax.com-On June 27, 2010:


Congressmen Seek to Halt Deportation of Son of Hamas Founder Who Became Spy for IsraelPosted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer-On June 25, 2010:


87 Senators Tell Obama: Stand Behind Israel!Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hillel Fendel-On June 24, 2010:


An open letter to President Obama from Jon VoightPosted on The Washington Times-By Jon Voight-On June 22, 2010:


US, Israel Warships in Suez May Be Prelude to Faceoff with IranPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On June 20, 2010:


Obama and the Rising Mob Against IsraelPosted on American Thinker-By James Lewis-On June 18, 2010:


Master puppeteers: “World misses new report on mullahs’ nuclear capability”Posted on The Washington Times-By Brigitte Gabriel-On June 18, 2010:


UN Screens Anti-Israel Flotilla Film, Israel Denied ResponsePosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Maayana Miskin-On June 18, 2010:


As Pro-Palestinian Flotilla Activists Gather in NYC, Jewish Group Urges State Dept. to Probe Links to TerrorismPosted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough, International Editor-On June 17, 2010:


Muslim From HAMAS Charity Brags About Tax-Funded Concessions From Obama WH VisitPosted By Debbie Schlussel-On June 16, 2010:


Security Chief: Hamas Still Smuggling, Can Strike Tel AvivPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On June 15, 2010:


Saudi Arabia: We will not give Israel air corridor for Iran strikePosted on Haaretz.com-By Haaretz Service-On June 14, 2010:


BANNED BY YOUTUBE: We Con the World, the Turkish ‘Aid to Gaza’ SongPosted on PJTV-On June 14, 2010:


Obama Opposes US Sanctions on IranPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hana Levi Julian-On June 13, 2010:


Boehner: Obama’s ‘coddled our enemies’Posted on TheHill.com-By Silla Brush-On June 13, 2010:


Report: Obama Nixed Anti-Riot Gear on FlotillaPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Maayana Miskin-On June 11, 2010:


Iranian Spy for CIA: ‘Weak West’ Will Cause War with IranPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On May 11, 2010:


Why is Obama Handing out Millions of Dollars to Terrorists?Posted on ExposeObama.com-By Patrick Brown-On June 11, 2010:


Rallies to Support IsraelPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hana Levi Julian-On June 10, 2010:


Mossad chief: Obama’s perceived military “softness” weakens IsraelPosted on ImpeachObamaCampaign.com-On June 2, 2010:


PA to Israelis: Go Back to EuropePosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Maayana Miskin-On May 17, 2010:


Former FBI Agent Echoes Obama’s ‘Blood and Treasure’ RemarkPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Avi Yellin-On May 10, 2010:


Abbas Calls Israel ‘ExtremistPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On May 5, 2010:


Former US Ambassador John Bolton: Obama Damages Israeli SecurityPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On May 4, 2010:


US Targets Israel as Anti-Nuke Conference BeginsPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hillel Fendel-On Ma 3, 2010:


Syria Accuses US of ‘Scud Slander;’ Peres: We Know for a FactPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On May 2, 2010:


War with Iran Could Last Years, Says Bar-Ilan U. ResearcherPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 27, 2010:


Egypt Warns of Mideast Summer WarPosted on NewsMax.com-On April 27, 2010:


Syrian-Turkish Joint Army Drill Intensifies Threat to IsraelPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 27, 2010:


PA Factions say No to Peace TalksPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Maayana Miskin-On April 26, 2010:


Schumer Blasts White House on Israel PolicyPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hana Levi Julian-On April 25, 2010:


Break the Silence’ Speaker: Obama’s ‘Alice-in-Wonderland’ Gov’t-Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hana Levi Julian-On April 25, 2010:


Abbas urges Obama to impose peace dealPosted on Yahoo News-By KARIN LAUB, Associated Press Writer-On April 24, 2010:


Massive Anti-Obama Rally Set for Sunday in New YorkPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hana Levi Julian-On April 21, 2010:


Jewish leaders fear sanctions won’t curb IranPosted Slate.com-By OneTinSoldier-On April 19, 2010:


Gaddafi: Obama from Arab Descent, a ‘Blessing’ to Muslim WorldPosted IsraelNationalNews.com-ByHana Levi Julian-On April 18, 2010:


Obama Faces Iran ‘Wake-up Call’ from Defense Secretary GatesPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 18, 2010:


NY Times Calls Neighborhood in Jerusalem ‘West Bank Settlement’Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 18, 2010:


Clinton Pushes Israel, not PA, to Take Risks for PeacePosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Maayana Miskin-On April 16, 2010:


World Jewish Congress: New Mideast Course for America?Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hana Levi Julian-On April 15, 2010:


Obama ‘Can’t Force’ Peace; Poll Results Back Netanyahu-Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 14, 2010:


Peres: Syria Arming Hizbullah with Scuds While Talking PeacePosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 13, 2010:


US Weapons to Lebanon Despite Hizbullah ClosenessPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hillel Fendel-On April 11, 2010:


Obama Slanders, Abandons IsraelPosted on NewsMax.com-By Edward Koch-On April 12, 2010:


Barack Obama and IsraelPosted on American Thinker-By Ed Lasky-On March 27, 2007:


In Quest to Break Mideast Stalemate, a U.S. Option EmergesPosted on The New York Times-By HELENE COOPER-On April 7, 2010:


House Majority to Clinton: Calm Down on IsraelPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Hillel Fendel-On March 28, 2010:


Netanyahu tries to play down tensions with USPosted on CBS News.com-On March 28, 2010:


Obama Dresses Down Netanyahu: No Photo Ops or Statements-Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Gil Ronen-On March 24, 2010:


Nationalists Blame Obama-Livni Collusion for Jerusalem Leaks-Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Gil Ronen-On March 24, 2010:


Is the US Eroding Israel’s Qualitative Edge?Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Avi Yellin-On March 23, 2010:


Nationalists Blame Obama-Livni Collusion for Jerusalem LeaksPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Gil Ronen-On March 24, 2010:


Obama blocks delivery of bunker-busters to IsraelPosted on WorldTribune.com-On March 18, 2010:


Obama continues attack on Israel, blocks delivery of bunker-busters to Israeli militaryPosted on JihadWath.org-By Robert-On March 18, 2010:


Why is US gov’t thwarting Iran sanctions bill?Posted on JPost.com-By MICHAEL M. ROSEN-On March 18, 2010:


Hamas: Fear of Jihad Led US Voters to Arab-Friendly ObamaPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Malkah Fleisher-On June 30, 2009:


Temple Institute Rabbi: Obama is a RobberPosted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By IsraelNN Staff-On June 10, 2009:


Note: These recent articles relate to and/or support my recent blog post-You Decide:

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!


Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?


Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?


Is Obama Administration “Abandoning” Israel?


The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran!


Will The New START Undermine Our Nuclear Security?


Nuclear Summit Part of Obama Administration’s ‘Fantasy Foreign Policy’


Where Is America Today?


Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!


A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:


“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question:  Is it possible for the Supreme Court to strike down Obamacare due to its unconstitutionality?

This article and/or blog post seems to give us some insight into the possibility of the Supreme Court striking down Obamacare-You Decide:

Napolitano: Supreme Court to Strike Down Obamacare!Posted on NewsMax.com-By David A. Patten-On March 26, 2010:


These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

President Barack Obama is one of the worst presidents ever in terms of respecting constitutional limitations on government, and the states suing the federal government over healthcare reform “have a pretty strong case” and are likely to prevail, according to author and judicial analyst Andrew P. Napolitano.

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV’s Ashley Martella, Napolitano says the president’s healthcare reforms amount to “commandeering” the state legislatures for federal purposes, which the Supreme Court has forbidden as unconstitutional.

“The Constitution does not authorize the Congress to regulate the state governments,” Napolitano says. “Nevertheless, in this piece of legislation, the Congress has told the state governments that they must modify their regulation of certain areas of healthcare, they must surrender their regulation of other areas of healthcare, and they must spend state taxpayer-generated dollars in a way that the Congress wants it done.

“That’s called commandeering the legislature,” he says. “That’s the Congress taking away the discretion of the legislature with respect to regulation, and spending taxpayer dollars. That’s prohibited in a couple of Supreme Court cases. So on that argument, the attorneys general have a pretty strong case and I think they will prevail.”

Napolitano, author of his just-released “Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History” and a Fox News senior judicial analyst, is the youngest Superior Court judge ever to attain lifetime tenure in the state of New Jersey. He served on the bench from 1987 to 1995.

Napolitano tells Newsmax that the longstanding precedent of state regulation of the healthcare industry makes the new federal regulations that much more problematic.

“The Supreme Court has ruled that in areas of human behavior that are not delegated to the Congress in the Constitution, and that have been traditionally regulated by the states, the Congress can’t simply move in there,” Napolitano says. “And the states for 230 years have had near exclusive regulation over the delivery of healthcare. The states license hospitals. The states license medications. The states license healthcare providers whether they’re doctors, nurses, or pharmacists. The feds have had nothing to do with it.

“The Congress can’t simply wake up one day and decide that it wants to regulate this. I predict that the Supreme Court will invalidate major portions of what the president just signed into law…”

The judge also says he would rate President Obama as one of the worst presidents in terms of obedience to constitutional limitations.

“I believe we have a one party system in this country, called the big-government party,” Napolitano says. “There is a Republican branch that likes war and deficits and assaulting civil liberties. There is a Democratic branch that likes welfare and taxes and assaulting commercial liberties.

“President Obama obviously is squarely within the Democratic branch. The president who had the least fidelity to the Constitution was Abraham Lincoln, who waged war on half the country, even though there’s obviously no authority for that, a war that killed nearly 700,000 people. President Obama is close to that end of lacking fidelity to the Constitution. He wants to outdo his hero FDR.”

For those who oppose healthcare, the Fox legal expert says, the bad news is that many of the legal challenges to healthcare reform will have to wait until 2014, when the changes become fully operational.

Until then, there would be no legal case that individuals had been actually harmed by the law. Moreover, Napolitano says it takes an average of four years for a case to work its way through the various federal courts the final hearing that’s expected to come before the Supreme Court.

“You’re talking about 2018, which is eight years from now, before it is likely the Supreme Court will hear this,” he says.

Other issues that Napolitano addressed during the wide-ranging interview:

  • He believes American is in danger of becoming “a fascist country,” which he defines as “private ownership, but government control.” He adds, “The government doesn’t have the money to own anything. But it has the force and the threat of violence to control just about anything it wants. That will rapidly expand under President Obama, unless and until the midterm elections give us a midterm correction – which everyone seems to think, and I’m in that group, is about to come our way.
  • Napolitano believes the federal government lacks the legal authority to order citizens to purchase healthcare insurance. The Congress [is] ordering human beings to purchase something that they might not want, might not need, might not be able to afford, and might not want — that’s never happened in our history before,” Napolitano says. “My gut tells me that too is unconstitutional, because the Congress doesn’t have that kind of power under the Constitution.”
  • The sweetheart deals in the healthcare reform bill used that persuaded Democrats to vote for it – the Louisiana Purchase, Cornhusker Kickback, Gatorade Exception and others – create “a very unique and tricky constitutional problem” for Democrats, because they treat citizens differently based on which state they live in, running afoul of the Constitution’s equal protection clause according to Napolitano. “So these bennies or bribes, whatever you want, or horse trading as it used to be called, clearly violate equal protection by forcing people in the other states to pay the bills of the states that don’t have to pay what the rest of us do,” Napolitano says.
  • Exempting union members from the so-called “Cadillac tax” on expensive health insurance policies, while imposing that tax on other citizens, is outright discrimination according to Napolitano. “The government cannot draw a bright line, with fidelity to the Constitution and the law, on the one side of which everybody pays, and the other side of which some people pay. It can’t say, ‘Here’s a tax, but we’re only going to apply it to nonunion people. Here’s a tax, and we’re only going to apply it to graduates of Ivy League institutions.’ The Constitution does not permit that type of discrimination.”
  • Politicians from both parties routinely disregard the Constitutional limits imposed on them by the nation’s founding document, Napolitano says. “The problem with the Constitution is not any structural problem,” says Napolitano. “The problem with the constitution is that those who take an oath to uphold it don’t take their oath seriously. For example, just a month ago in interviewing Congressman Jim Clyburn, who’s the No. 3 ranking Democrat in the House, I said to him, Congressman Clyburn, can you tell me where in the Constitution the Congress is authorized to regulate healthcare? He said, ‘Judge, most of what we do down here,’ referring to Washington, ‘is not authorized by the Constitution. Can you tell me where in the Constitution we’re prohibited from regulating healthcare.’ Napolitano says that reflects a misunderstanding of what the Constitution actually is. “He’s turning the Constitution on its head, because Congress is not a general legislature,” he says. “It was not created in order to right every wrong. It exists only to legislate in the 17 specific, discrete, unique areas where the Constitution has given it power. All other areas of human area are reserved for the states.”
  • Napolitano says that members of Congress infringe on Constitutional rights because they fail to recognize its basis. “They reject Jefferson’s argument, in the Declaration of Independence, that our rights come from our Creator, therefore they’re natural rights, therefore they can’t be legislated away,” Napolitano says. “They think they can legislate on any activity, regulate any behavior, tax any person or thing, as long as the politics will let them survive. They’re wrong, and with this healthcare legislation, they may be proven wrong, in a very direct and in-your-face way.”

Note: Listen to Judge Napolitano’s important message to all


Note:  The following website reveals Health Care for America Now (HCAN), which is a George Soros funded organization that was established in early 2009, and describes itself as a “national grassroots campaign of more than 1,000 organizations in 46 states representing 30 million people” who believe that “our government’s responsibility is to guarantee quality affordable health care for everyone in America and it must play a central role in regulating, financing, and providing health coverage …” Specifically, HCAN supports a “single payer” model where the federal government would be in charge of financing and administering the entire U.S. healthcare system.

HCAN’s strategy is to achieve such a system incrementally, first by implementing “the public option”—i.e., a government insurance agency to “compete” with private insurers, so that Americans will be “no longer at the mercy of the private insurance industry.” Because such a government agency would not need to show a profit in order to remain in business, and because it could tax and regulate its private competitors in whatever fashion it pleased, this “public option” would soon force private insurers out of the industry.

Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean announced HCAN’s mission on the first night of the annual “America’s Future Now!” conference hosted in June 2009 by the Campaign for America’s Future, where Dean pledged to spend up to $82 million to advance the cause of socialized medicine.

Effective at mobilizing large numbers of demonstrators who share its healthcare ideals, HCAN rallied 15,000 people in Washington, DC in April 2009, another 10,000 there in June 2009, and—in collaboration with the Maine People’s Alliance—hundreds more in three Maine cities the month after that. In addition to organizing and funding local demonstrations such as these, HCAN devoted significant financial resources to such initiatives as advertising in regional and national television and print media, and to establishing a major presence in the new media world of the Internet, blogs, and text messaging.

Most of HCAN’s component organizations have no experience or expertise in health care, and virtually all have received large, tax-exempt grants from leftist billionaire financiers like George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry. The public demonstrations for health-care reform that HCAN has organized are largely Soros-financed operations. In August 2009, Soros pledged $5 million to HCAN.

The HCAN Steering Committee is composed of the following organizations: ACORN; the AFL-CIO; the AFSCME; the American Federation of Teachers; Americans United for Change; the Campaign for America’s Future; the Center for American Progress Action Fund; the Campaign for Community Change (the so-called “action center” of the Center for Community Change); the Children’s Defense Fund Action Council; the Communications Workers of America; the United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW); MoveOn.org; the NAACP; the National Council of La Raza; the National Education Association; the National Women’s Law Center; the Service Employees International Union (SEIU); the United Food and Commercial Workers Union; USAction; Women’s Voices, Women’s Vote; and Working America.

Health Care for America Now (HCAN)Posted on DiscoverThe Networks.org:


Note:  What follows is a series of videos that contain an interview that was conducted by Peter Robinson with Richard Epstein, a professor of law at the NYU law school, a senior fellow of the Hoover Institution, and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago law school, whose latest book is The Case Against the Employee Free Choice Act and John Yoo, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley law school, whose recent book is Crisis and Command. The subject of the interview is whether Obamacare is constitutional or not.-You Decide:

The Law with Epstein & Yoo: Chapter 1 of 2 (Is Obamacare unconstitutional? Scholars Richard Epstein and John Yoo respond.)Posted on National Review Online-On January 17, 2011:


The Law with Epstein & Yoo: Chapter 2 of 2 (Richard Epstein and John Yoo explain why the “encroachment” argument beats the “general welfare” argument in the case against Obamacare.)Posted on National Review Online-On January 18, 2011:


Obamacare & the Supreme Court with Richard Epstein & John Yoo: Chapter 3 of 5 (Richard Epstein and John Yoo discuss the political implications of taking on Obamacare in the Supreme Court.)-Posted on National Review Online-On January 25, 2011:


Obamacare & the Supreme Court with Richard Epstein & John Yoo: Chapter 4 of 5 (Law professors and constitutional scholars Richard Epstein and John Yoo speculate about Supreme Court decisions in 2012 and censorship and the FCC.)-Posted on National Review Online-On January 26, 2011:


Obamacare & the Supreme Court with Richard Epstein & John Yoo: Chapter 5 of 5 (Richard Epstein and John Yoo discuss the rule of law in our time and the future.)-Posted on National Review Online-On January 27, 2011:


Note:   What follows are numerous articles and/or blog posts, law suits, state legislature Healthcare Amendments and videos that relate to and/or support the above article and/or blog post and video-You Decide:

Ryan Plan Would Save Medicare; Obamacare Will Destroy It!Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Joseph Klein-On August 14, 2012:




CNN STAR CAUGHT READING LIBERAL BLOG ON AIR: ‘She is a puppet. Somebody’s mouthing for her!’-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacks-On August 14, 2012:


Finding Out What’s In It: Part Eleventy And Why They Want To Move Forward From Here!-Posted on Musings Of A Mad Conservative-On July 18, 2012:


Video: Brain Surgeon Confirms ObamaCare Rations Care, Has Death Panels!Posted on Western Journalism-By JOEL VALENZUELA-On July 16, 2012:


Video: Proof Obama Admin Argued Before SCOTUS That ObamaCare Mandate A Tax!-Posted on Western Journalism-By KRIS ZANE-On July 11, 2012:


Video: ObamaCare IRS Agents The ‘New Gestapo’!-Posted on Western Journalism-By KRIS ZANE-On July 9, 2012:


The Tax Man Cometh to Police You on Obamacare!-Posted on NewsMax.com-On July 7, 2012:


Holder says ‘courts have final say’ in response to furor over Obama’s health law comments!-Posted on FoxNews.com-On April 4, 2012:


Appeals court fires back at Obama’s comments on health care case!-Posted on CBSNews.com-By Jan Crawford-On April 3, 2012:


Video: Michael Savage: Obama Threatens Supreme Court!-Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On April 3, 2012:


OBAMA DECLARES WAR ON SUPREME COURT!Posted on Big Government-By BEN SHAPIRO-On April 2, 2012:


Obama warns ‘unelected’ Supreme Court against striking down health law!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By The Associated Press-On April 2, 2012:


ObamaCare Subjects Nearly Every Phone And Computer To Government Control!-Posted on Big Government-By SETON MOTLEY-On March 12, 2012:


The Calls for Liberty Have Not Been Silenced!Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Mike Brownfield-On March 8, 2012:


How The Commerce Clause Will Be Used To Stuff ObamaCare Down Our Throats!-Posted on Western Journalism-By DOUG BOOK-On February 28, 2012:


Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Meeting on Feb. 17 to Discuss Health Care/Eligibility Challenge!Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On February 17, 2012:


Supreme Court Conferred On Obamacare, Obama Eligibility Challenge yesterday!-Posted on Obama Ballot Challenge-By Pamela Barnett-On February 19, 2012:


CBO: ObamaCare-Like Programs Don’t Save Money or Reduce Costs!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On January 20, 2012:


Was The Bank Of America ‘Occupation’ A Coordinated, ACORN-Affiliated Attack?Posted on The Blaze-By Billy Hallowell-On November 21, 2011:


Supreme Court Will Hear Obamacare Challenge This Term, Before 2012 Election!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press-On November 14, 2011:


Three reasons for Kagan’s recusal!-Posted American Vision News-By Joel McDurmon-On November 19, 2011:


JW Releases New Kagan Emails as Obamacare Heads to Supreme Court!Posted on Judicial Watch-By Tom Fitton-On November 18, 2011:


Health case raises recusal questions for Kagan, Thomas!-Posted on The Washington Times-By Stephen Dinan, The Washington Times-On November 14, 2011:


Kagan Cheered ObamaCare Passage!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By By Terence P. Jeffrey-On November 10, 2011:


Revealed for first time: Sordid origins of Obamacare legislation traced to Soros group, marketed by slew of radicals!Posted on Klein Online-On October 27, 2011:


Obama Healthcare Law Cleared for US Supreme Court!-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Newsmax Wires-On September 26, 2011:


HHS Privately Calls Obamacare “Recipe For Disaster”!Posted on Judicial Watch-On September 16, 2011:


Report: CLASS’ Untold Story: Taxpayers, Employers, and States On the Hook For Flawed Entitlement Program!Posted on EnergyCommerce.house.gov-On September 2011:


Palin, Others Slam ‘Corrupt’ Pelosi Healthcare WaiversPosted on NewsMax.com-By Newsmax Wires-On May 18, 2011:


Federal Judge Stays Own Ruling Against ObamaCare-Posted on New American-By MICHAEL TENNANT-On March 6, 2011:


Number of healthcare reform law waivers climbs above 1,000Posted on The Hill-By Jason Millman-On March 6, 2011:


CBO: Obamacare will cost 800,000 jobsPosted on American Thinker-By Rick Moran-On February 11, 2011:


Obamacare furthers black genocidePosted on Renew America-By Lloyd Marcus-On February 11, 2011:


Are Two Constitutional Crises on the Way?Posted on Pajamas Media-By Dan Miller-On February 9, 2011:


The Obamacare Assault on the Rule of LawPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On February 3, 2011:


Video: Rush Limbaugh on Obama’s Felonies!Posted on ExposeObama.com-On February 5, 2011:


Video: Mark Levin, Implementing ObamaCare is a Felony!Posted on ExposeObama.com-On February 4, 2011:


Scientologists, Amish, Christian Scientists, and Muslim Will Be Exempt From Requirements to Obtain Health InsurancePosted on Snopes.com:


Obama Was Against Forcing Americans to Buy Health Insurance Before He Was For ItPosted on CNSNews.com-By Eric Scheiner-On February 2, 2011:


Liberals Describe Monday’s Health Care Ruling As ‘Judicial Activism’ by ConservativesPosted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On February 1, 2011:


Morning Bell: Another Victory on the Road to Repeal!Posted on Heritage Foundation-On February 1, 2011:


Health Judge Uses Obama’s Words Against Him!Posted on NewsMax.com-On February 1, 2011:


Judge Rules Health Care Law Is UnconstitutionalPosted on Fox News-On January 31, 2011:


McCollum: High Court Will Strike Down ObamacarePosted on NewsMax.com-By David A. Patten and Ashley Martella-On January 31, 2011:


Medicare Official Doubts Health Care Law Savings!Posted on CNSNews.com-By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Associated Press-On January 26, 2011:


Video: Howard Dean Admits ObamaCare will Wreck Insurance, Doesn’t “Care” If It’s UnconstitutionalPosted on ExposeObama.com-On January 7, 2011:


Obamacare Waivers Go To AlliesPosted on Judicial Watch-On January 6, 2011:


Forget Death Panels: Pro-Life Group Says Repeal ObamaCare Over Rationing!Posted on LifeNews.com-By Steven Ertelt , Washington, DC-On January 6, 2011:


Death Panels Re-Defeated? Officials Say Obama Will Reverse Himself-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On January 5, 2011:


Obama Embraces ‘Death Panel’ Concept in Medicare Rule!Posted on NewsMax.com-On December 26, 2010:


US Judge Rejects Key Part of Obama Healthcare LawPosted on NewsMax.com-On December 13, 2010:


The Littlest Victims of Obamacare!Posted on Townhall-By Michelle Malkin-On December 1, 2010:


Administration Is Bracing for Court Setbacks to Health Law!Posted on The New York Times-By KEVIN SACK and ROBERT PEAR-On November 26, 2010:


Congressman, doctor agree – ObamaCare must go!Posted on One News Now-By Chris Woodward-On November 26, 2010:


Doctors say Medicare cuts force painful decision about elderly patients!-Posted on The Washington Post-By N.C. Aizenman, Washington Post Staff Writer-On November 26, 2010:


Pence Seeks to Defund Planned Parenthood: “The Time Has Come To Deny Any And All Federal Funding To Planned Parenthood”Posted on MikePence.house.gov:


Union Drops Health Coverage for Workers’ Children!Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By Yuliya Chernova-On November 20, 2010:


Obamacare Endgame: ‘Doctors Will be Fined or Jailed if they Put Patients First!Posted on Big Government-By Dr. Elaina George-On November 18, 2010:


McConnell and 32 Republicans file brief on repealing health reformPosted on The Hill-By Michael O’Brien-On November 18, 2010:


Who Should Control Your Health Care, You Or The Government?Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On November 17, 2010:


U.S. Health Care and U.S. Productivity!Posted on National Review Online- By John R. Graham-On November 17, 2010:


Where’s My Obamacare Waiver? ‘Everyone should get the break that Big Labor is getting!’Posted on National Review Online-By Michelle Malkin-On November 17, 2010:


Man Denied Life-Saving Liver Transplant Because of Cuts in Arizona’s Medicaid Program!Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On November 17, 2010:


Republican Senator Challenges Medicare Director Who Called for Redistribrution of Wealth on His Recess AppointmentPosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On November 17, 2010:




Misinformation and Naivety on Abortion and Mental HealthPosted on National Review Online- By Priscilla K. Coleman-On November 15, 2010:


Q&A With Virginia Attorney General: State’s Lawsuit Against Obamacare ‘Is Not About Health Insurance, It’s About Liberty’-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Terence P. Jeffrey-On November 15, 2010:


Obama’s Claiming More Power Over Americans Than King George III, Says Virginia Attorney GeneralPosted on CNSNews.com-By Terence P. Jeffrey-On November 12, 2010:


Krugman Smears ‘Death Panel’ CriticsPosted on NewsMax.com-On November 14, 2010:


Krugman: Death Panels, VAT Will Fix Debt CrisisPosted on NewsMax.com-On November 14, 2010:


Fewer Americans Want To Work: An Obama Success?Posted on Townhall-By Austin Hill-On November 14, 2010:


Morning Bell: The Obamacare Burden To Your State BudgetPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On November 12, 2010:


Obamacare Hits the Most Vulnerable: ‘The most important element of medical progress is scientific innovation.’Posted on National Reiew Online-By MONA CHAREN-On November 12, 2010:


Video: Jesse Jackson Says Opposing ObamaCare is “Creeping Genocide”Posted on ExposeObama.com-On November 11, 2010:


Mandate Challenge Could PrevailPosted on Richmond Times Dispatch-By ILYA SOMIN-On November 7, 2010:


Morning Bell: Get to Work Repealing ObamacarePosted on The Heritage Foundation-On November 5, 2010:


Repeal Obamacare Now!-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On November 3, 2010:


Citing health overhaul, AARP hikes employee costsPosted on Springfield News Sun- By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, The Associated Press-On November 4, 2010:


Don’t Hire the PoorPosted on The American Conservative Union-By John Goodman-On November 3, 2010:


CBO Director Says ObamaCare Will Drive People From the WorkforcePosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On October 26, 2010:


Admin. Attacks Businesses Telling Truth About ObamaCare — AgainPosted on Floyd Reports-By Guest Writer-On October 21, 2010:


Cuccinelli: Obamacare Is UnconstitutionalPosted on Nax.com-By Dan Weil-On October 18, 2010:


Morning Bell: A Legal Victory on the Road to RepealPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On October 15, 2010:


HHS Scrambles to Stop Insurers From Dropping Their ‘Child-Only’ Policies-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On October 14, 2010:


Judge grants request to file Amicus Curiae Brief claiming health care bill null and void due to Obama’s ineligibilityPosted on Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On October 8, 2010:


McDonald’s, 29 other firms get health care coverage waivers-Posted on USA Today-By Drew Armstrong, Bloomberg Business News-On October 8, 2010:


McDonald’s Offers Taste of Obama Sausage MakingPosted on Bloomberg-By Caroline Baum-On October 7, 2010:


From “Health Nazis” to Death PanelsPosted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On October 7, 2010:


Doctor Shortage? Use NursesPosted on NewsMaxHealth.com-On October 6, 2010:


Health Care Groups to Congress: Restrict Funding of Office of Medicare Chief Who Advocated RationingPosted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On October 05, 2010:


Obamacare Side Effects: Unintended but Not UnforeseenPosted on MyHeritage.org-By Bethany Murphy-On October 5, 2010:


Gov’t-Run Health Care Death Sentence in AZ: No More Liver Transplants for Hep-C PatientsPosted on CNSNews.com-By Susan Jones-On October 05, 2010:


HHS: Government-Mandated Electronic Health Records Need ‘NOT’ Include Cancer Diagnoses–As Opposed to Obesity RatingsPosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On October 04, 2010:


Growing Pains for a Centerpiece of Health OverhaulPosted on NewsMax.com-On October 3, 2010:


Insurer Cuts Health Plans as New Law Takes Hold-Posted on The New York Times-By REED ABELSON-On September 30, 2010:


3M to Change Health-Plan Options for Workers-Posted on The Wall Stree Journal-By JANET ADAMY-On October 4, 2010:


Voters in 3 states to consider opting out of ‘Obamacare’Posted on The Washington Times-By Valerie Richardson-On October 3, 2010:


McDonalds May Drop Health Plans of 30,000 EmployeesPosted on The Wall Street Journal-By JANET ADAMY-On September 30, 2010:


No, You Can’t Keep Your Current Health CoveragePosted on The American Spectator-By Andrew Cline-On September 30, 2010:


Obama’s Unconfirmed Medicare Director Who Called for Redistributing Wealth Through Health Care Won’t Answer Questions From SenatePosted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On September 24, 2010:


Hoyer Personally Opposes Repealing Obamacare; Won’t Say If He’ll Ask Other Democratic Members and Candidates to Pledge to Oppose Repeal-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover-On September 24, 2010:


Morning Bell: Six Months Closer to RepealPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 23, 2010:


Defund Obamacare? Boehner Says: ‘I Am Committed To Doing Everything’ to Stop ItPosted on CNSNews.com-By Nicholas Ballasy-On September 16, 2010:


FACT CHECK: White House health savings challengedPosted on The Seattle Times-By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR-On September 13, 2010:


Obama’s War on America’s SeniorsPosted on The Spectator-By Peter Ferrara-On September 15, 2010:


Morning Bell: The Obamacare and Obama Tax Hike Double Whammy on SeniorsPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 15, 2010:


States’ suit on Obama health plan may go to trialPosted on Yahoo News.com-By The Associated Press-On September 14, 2010:


Morning Bell: Obamacare vs. the Rule of LawPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 14, 2010:


How ObamaCare Guts Medicare: ‘The president’s pledge that ‘If you like your health plan, you will be able to keep it’ clearly does not apply to America’s seniors.’Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By PETER FERRARA 
AND LARRY HUNTER-On September 9, 2010:


Health Insurers Pin Rate Hikes on Obamacare-Posted on NewsMax.com-On September, 8, 2010:


Gov’t Study Finds Consumer-Driven Health Plans Control Costs Better Than Traditional InsurancePosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On September 01, 2010:


Key Senate Democrat suggests that he didn’t read entire healthcare reform billPosted on The Hill-By Jordan Fabian-On August 25, 2010:


Americans Losing Confidence in ObamaCare’s Promise of Lower Costs and Medicare GuaranteePosted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer-On August 24, 2010:


The Lawsuit that Could Overturn ObamaCarePosted on ExposeObama.com-By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, Floyd Reports-On August 13, 2010:


Missouri Voters Reject ‘Obamacare’Posted on Vision to America-By Jim Hoft, Big Government-On August 4, 2010:


Morning Bell: Another Victory on the Road to RepealPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On August 3, 2010:


Va. Health Care Reform Lawsuit Clears First Hurdle-Posted on NewsMax.com-On August 2, 2010:


Obamacare reversal? House 75% of the way there! “Plan intends to take nationalized decision-making plan, pull it out ‘by the roots’”Posted on WBD.com-By Bob Unruh-On July 28, 2010:


58 Percent of Americans Want Obamacare RepealedPosted on NewsMax.com-On July 26, 2010:


Obama Doesn’t Care if You Are Against Abortions: You’ll Pay for them Anyways!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-By Benjamin Chapman, Floyd Reports-On July 24, 2010:


Obama’s Promise About AbortionsPosted on ExposeObama.com-On July 24, 2010:


Some Insurers Stop Writing New Coverage for KidsPosted on NewsMax.com-On July 23, 2010:


New Tax on Gold Is Hidden in ObamacarePosted on MoneyNews.com-By Julie Crawshaw-On July 21, 2010:


Great news! Obama’s healthcare 1099 scheme will choke the IRS in a glut of paperworkPosted on The Collins Report-By Kevin “Coach” Collins-On July 22, 2010:


Maryland Becomes Second State to Offer Federally Funded Abortions under ObamacarePosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On July 16, 2010:


Under new federal regulations in Obama’s America a commissar will decide if you are too fatPosted on Collins Report-By Kevin “Coach” Collins-On July 17, 2010:


Month’s late Social Security/Medicare Trustees report means Obama is hiding very bad insolvency newsPosted on Collins Report-By Kevin “Coach” Collins-On July 16, 2010:


The Bitter Fruit of ObamaCarePosted on ExposeObama.com-By Floyd Brown-On July 16, 2010:


Side Effects: IRS and Businesses Unite Against Obamacare?-Posted on Fix Health Care Policy-On July 13, 2010:


Activist: A ‘deceiver’ in the Oval OfficePosted on Politics and Government-By Charlie Butts and Jody Brown, OneNewsNow-On July 15, 2010:


GOP’s Barrasso: Healthcare Rationing on the HorizonPosted on NewsMax.com-On July 12, 2010:


Gibbs Evades Question of Whether Obama Agrees With His Medicare Director That Health-Care System Must Redistribute WealthPosted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer-On July 08, 2010:


Obama to Bypass Senate to Name Health OfficialPosted on The New York Times-By ROBERT PEAR-On July 6, 2010:


Are Overdue Reports Concealing ObamaCare Impact On Medicare?Posted on Investors Business Daily-By PETER FERRARA-On July 6, 2010:


Boehner Releases “ObamaCare: Three Months of Broken Promises” ReportPosted on ExposeObama.com-On June 23, 2010:


Heritage spin-off targets ObamaCare in first grassroots campaignPosted on The Daily Caller-By Caroline May, The Daily Caller-On June 17, 2010:


Obama Admin. Argues in Court That Individual Mandate Is a TaxPosted on The American Spectator-By Philip Klein-On June 17, 2010:


O’s radical pick for MedicarePosted on The New York Post-By BETSY MCCAUGHEY-On June 16, 2010:


Was Obamacare designed for ‘distribution of wealth’? “Blueprint urged ‘creation’ of crisis to push radical plan”Posted on WND.com-On June 14, 2010:


White House Backs $125 Million to Sell ObamacarePosted on NewsMax.com-On June 11, 2010:


Side Effects: Obamacare Adds to the Ranks of the Uninsured-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On June 11, 2010:


Morning Bell: Obamacare’s True Costs Coming to LightPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On June 2, 2010:


Sebelius: Rationing Advocate is ‘Absolutely Right Leader At This Time’ to Run MedicarePosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On May 27, 2010:


White House Health Czar Repeats False Claim of Lower Health CostsPosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On May 18, 2010:


Pelosi to Aspiring Musicians: “Quit Your Job, Taxpayers Will Cover Your Health Care”Posted on CNSNews.com-By Nicholas Ballasy, Video Reporter-On May 14, 2010:


Obamacare’s BurdensPosted on MyHeritage.org-By Amanda J. Reinecker-On May 14, 2010:


Obama Threatens Veto of Obamacare as Cost Estimates Soar Above $1 TrillionPosted on NewsMax.com-On May 12, 2010:


CBO Says Obamacare May Exceed $1 TrillionPosted on NewsMax.com-On May 12, 2010:


Pataki Says Obamacare Can Be RepealedPosted on NewsMax.com-By John Rossomando-On April 25, 2010:


Health care law’s unfinished business: cost curbsPosted on Yahoo News-By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press Writer-On April 25, 2010:


Johnson & Johnson CEO William C. Weldon Defends Pro-ObamaCare and “Cap-and-Trade” Lobbying; Pledges to Disclose Amount of Company Funds Given to PhRMA to Lobby for ObamaCarePosted on National Center for Public Policy Research-On April 23, 2010:


Breyer: Health overhaul could come before courtPosted on Yahoo News-By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer-On April 15, 2010:


AP-GfK Poll: Resistance to health care bill strongPosted on Yahoo News-By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press Writer-On April 15, 2010:


Morning Bell: Andy Stern’s AmericaPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 13, 2010:


President’s panel may consider VAT taxPosted on USAToday.com-On April 8, 2010:


Rep. Wasserman Schultz Insists Health Care Law Doesn’t Require Individuals to Buy Insurance-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On April 7, 2010:


In Medicine, the Power of NoPosted on The New York Times-By DAVID LEONHARDT-On April 6, 2010:


Morning Bell: How the Left Really Plans to Pay for Obamacare-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 7, 2010:


Health care overhaul spawns mass confusion for publicPosted on Mcclatchydc.com-By Margaret Talev | McClatchy Newspapers-On April 6, 2010:


Obama’s Civilian Army is now LAW and is FundedPosted on YouTube-By ChangetheChange-On March 28, 2010:


Greenspan: If CBO Numbers Wrong, Obamacare DisastrousPosted on NewsMax.com-By John Rossomando-On April 5, 2010:


Hon. James David Manning, PhD states there’s only one way to take back ObamaPosted on The Manning Report-On April 1, 2010:


Top Dems Call Companies ‘Irresponsible’ for Taking Write-Downs on Retiree Drug Benefits — Even Though Federal Rules Require ItPosted on CNSNews-By Christopher Neefus-On April 02, 2010:


That Cornhusker Kickback Will Cost You PlentyPosted on Personal Liberty Digest-By Chip Wood-On April 2, 2010:


Who in the White House Authorized a BribePosted on ExposeObama.com-By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, Expose Obama-On April 2, 2010:


Lies, Damned Lies, and Healthcare-Posted on The National Republic Trust-By Scott Wheeler-On March 25, 2010:


HERITAGE PRESIDENT ED FEULNER RESPONDS TO PRESIDENT OBAMA’S CLAIMS: “The Heritage Foundation reacted angrily today to President Obama’s claim that a centerpiece of his health care legislation “originated” from the conservative think tank”Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 30, 2010:


Surgeon General Says Health Care ‘Moving in Wrong Direction,’ Even With Expansion of Government EntitlementsPosted on CNSNews.com-By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer-On March 31, 2010:


Physicians’ Group Sues Sebelius Over Health-Care Reform LawPosted on CNSNews.com-By Christopher Neefus-On March 31, 2010:


Rep. Bachmann: Obama’s ‘Redistribution of Wealth’ Goal Reached by Forcing People to Buy Health InsurancePosted on CNSNews.com-By Nicholas Ballasy-On March 31, 2010:


Seniors fear health care remake will hurt MedicarePosted on Yahoo News-By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press Writer-On March 31, 2010:


Fla. Rep. Putnam: Obamacare ‘Tax on Living’Posted on NewsMax.com-By Jim Meyers-On March 31, 2010:


H.R.3590-Title: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act-Posted on Thomas.loc.gov-On March 23, 2010:


Supreme Court May Weigh Coverage MandatePosted on NewsMax.com-By Kara Rowland-On March 29, 2010:


Obama Steps Up Confrontation: “White House Seeks to Rally Supporters With Aggressive Tone Against Opponents”Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By JONATHAN WEISMAN-On March 30, 2010:


Stimulus stumbles hold lessons for health care sellPosted on Politico-By CAROL E. LEE-On March 30, 2010:


Morning Bell: $1 Billion AT&T Headache is Just Obamacare’s First Side EffectPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 30, 2010:


The Dawn of a New Age In the United StatesPosted on RealClearMarkets.com-By Bill Frezza-On March 29, 2010:


Transforming America: “The president has brought change to America”Posted on The Weekly Standard-By IRWIN M. STELZER-On March 27, 2010:


Companies Push to Repeal Provision of Health LawPosted on The New York Times-By STEVEN GREENHOUSE-On March 29, 2010:


Health premiums may rise 17% for young adults buying own insurancePosted on USA Today-By Carla K. Johnson, The Associated Press-On March 30, 2010:


Flap on Children’s Coverage Settled: “Insurers Say They Will Accept Pre-Existing Conditions After Dispute on Timing, Warn of Higher Prices”Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By AVERY JOHNSON-On March 30, 2010:


Health care law too costly, most sayPosted on USA Today-By Susan Page, USA TODAY-On March 30, 2010:


Democrats Brace for Backlash From First Wave of ObamacarePosted on NewsMax.com-On March 29, 2010:


Rep. Burgess: Government Can Force Us to Buy General Motors Products If Obamacare Mandate Upheld in CourtPosted on CNSNews.com-By Nicholas Ballasy, Video Reporter-On March 29, 2010:


Majority of Americans Wants Repeal of Health Care Reform Law, Poll SaysPosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On Monday, March 29, 2010:


Rasmussen: 54% Favor Repeal of HealthcarePosted on NewsMax.com-On March 29, 2010:


After ObamaCare, Only 38% Think America’s Best Days Lay AheadPosted on CNSNews-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On March 29, 2010:


Why Obama and the left fear the tea-party movementPosted on WND.com-On March 27, 2010:


14 states sue to block health care lawPosted on CNN.com-By CNN Wire Staff-On March 23, 2010:


Virginia’s Attorney General, Ken Cuccinelli, filed suit separately in Richmond, Virginia:


Governor McDonnell Signs Virginia Healthcare Freedom Act LegislationPosted on Campaign For Liberty-By dljholt-On March 25, 2010:


Utah and Idaho have signed into law variations of Healthcare Freedom Acts:



Obama Depopulation Policy Exposed! Red Alert!!!!!!-Posted on YouTube.com-By otraverdad-On June 25, 2009:


Obama Depopulation Policy ExposedPosted on YouTube.com-By buzzniz-On June 27, 2009:


Note: These articles, video, suits and state legislature Healthcare Amendments relate to and/or support my recent blog posts-You Decide:

Behind Closed Doors, Unions Win, You Lose!


Health Care Reform: “The Perils of Inaction and the Promise of Effective Action”


The Truth About the Health Care Bills:


Obama Care Lawsuits!


The Reason for the Treason!


Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?


Where Is America Today?


The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!


The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!


Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation! 


Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!


A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:


“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question: Will the Obama Administration’s supposed new nuclear arms agreement with Russia, which is intended to replace the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), undermine our Nuclear Security?

The following article reveals the disturbing answer to this question-You Decide:

 A START towards Undermining Our Nuclear SecurityPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 25, 2010:


These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“Yesterday the Kremlin announced that the Obama administration and Russia had reached agreement on a new nuclear arms agreement intended to replace the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). The declaration appeared to surprise the White House, as Press Secretary Robert Gibbs could only confirm that the two sides were “close” to a treaty. But U.S. officials confirm that “all major obstacles” in negotiations with Moscow have been cleared.

Russian approval of a new START agreement has been the cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s “long road toward eliminating nuclear weapons” policy. President Obama’s desire to appease Russia is why he began negotiations by unilaterally surrendering to Kremlin demands that the United States betray our Czech Republic and Polish allies by going back on our promise to build ballistic missile defense facilities in Eastern Europe. Russians took President Obama’s easy and early capitulation on missile defense as a sign of naivete and weakness and concluded that the Obama administration was far more desperate for a new nuclear treaty than they were and, as The Los Angeles Times reports, “used that fact in negotiations.”

The full text of the new agreement has not been released, but early reports indicate that it will not adequately address three key issues and would therefore compromise U.S. national security:

Verification: The Russians have a long and well documented history of violating arms control agreements. By focusing intently on the reduction in each nation’s strategic arsenal, the U.S. has lost some negotiating ground on the issue of verification. The Senate must ensure that the new treaty is adequately verifiable. There is no reason to sign the treaty if the verification mechanisms fall by the wayside.

Nuclear Modernization: Some arms control advocates insist that the U.S. has a robust nuclear modernization program. This claim is simply inaccurate. The truth is that America’s nuclear infrastructure is rapidly aging, in deep atrophy, and is losing its reliability and effectiveness. The U.S. is not producing new nuclear weapons, and its ICBM force is shrinking and not being modernized. In contrast, Russia and China are engaged in a major modernization effort. On December 16, 41 U.S. Senators voiced their concerns and signed a letter saying they will oppose the new treaty if it does not include specific plans for U.S. nuclear modernization as stipulated in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010.

Missile Defense: It is absolutely imperative that a new START agreement not undermine our post-Cold War defensive posture by linking offensive weapons with missile defense. But early reports indicate that the treaty does exactly that. The New York Times reports: “Administration officials describing the draft treaty said its preamble recognized the relationship between offensive weapons and missile defense, but that the language was not binding.” But the Times goes on to quote retired major general Vladimir Dvorkin who says Moscow will scrap the treaty if the U.S. pursues missile defense: “If, for example, the U.S. unilaterally deploys considerable amounts of missile defense, then Russia has the right to withdraw from the agreement because the spirit of the preamble has been violated.”

The Obama Administration’s arms control strategy has been deeply flawed. It is based on outdated 1970s arms control strategy and 1960s idealism and naivete. It will not work because it does not account for Russian nuclear strategy, which is based on approximate parity between the two sides, Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), denial of missile defenses to the U.S., and nuclear warfighting capability. The U.S. needs to reset the reset before the Obama administration is allowed to seriously undermine our national security.”

Note:  The following websites and report reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) funds: (a) organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending; (b) organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies; and, (c) the Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG), which is a liberal internationalist coalition of U.S. donors who believe the best way to prevent wars, constrain rogue nations, and prevent the spread of nuclear weapons is to let international laws and organizations set the terms of world peace. The umbrella group, whose listed supporters claim to have assets exceeding $25 billion, aims to entangle the U.S. government in a process of international negotiation to create a new global legal regime. It would likely limit U.S. sovereignty and replace a strong national defense with endless rounds of international rulemaking and consensus-building-You Decide:

(a) Organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending:

  • The American Friends Service Committee, which views America as the world’s chief source of international strife, has long had a friendly relationship with the Communist Party USALamenting that “the United States spends 59% of the discretionary federal budget on military-related expenses,” the Committee seeks to “realign national spending priorities and to increase the portion of the budget that is spent on housing, quality education for all, medical care, and fair wages.” In 2000, George Soros himself was a signatory to a letter titled “Appeal for Responsible Security” that appeared in The New York Times. The letter called upon the U.S. government “to commit itself unequivocally to negotiate the worldwide reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons,” and to participate in “the global de-alerting of nuclear weapons and deep reduction of nuclear stockpiles.”

(b) Organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies:

  • According to George Soros, “We need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy.” Consistent with this perspective, the Open Society Institute in 2008 gave $150,000 to the United Nations Foundation, which “works to broaden support for the UN through advocacy and public outreach.” Moreover, OSI is considered a “major” funder of the Coalition for an International Criminal Court, which aims to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures in certain cases to an international prosecutor who could initiate capricious or politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. officials and military officers.


Guide to The George Soros Network-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:


(c) Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:


The New Internationalism: Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!Posted on Capital Research Center-By John J. Tierney-On August 2009:


Question: Could it be true that the U.S. has sold 50% of its uranium to Russia and, if true, what’s wrong with this picture?

This recent article and/or blog post reveals the disturbing answer to this question-You Decide:

Russia set to control half of U.S. uranium output?Posted on GlennBeck.com-On December 6,  2010:


Note:  What follows is a WikiLeaks Cabel that reveals that the U.S. secretly agreed to give Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign key treaty-You Decide:

WikiLeaks cables: US agrees to tell Russia Britain’s nuclear secrets. ‘The US secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty’Posted on The Daily Telegraph-By Matthew Moore, Gordon Rayner and Christopher Hope-On February 4, 2011:


Note:  What follows are numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to and/or support the above article and/or blog post-You Decide:

The coming chaos from the Obama-Soertoro playbook!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez on April 24, 2012:


Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Bingaman Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 13, 2012:


Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Congressman Heinrich Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 13, 2012:


Follow-up Letter to NM Governor Martinez Regarding The Removal of President Obama From The NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot!Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez on April 12, 2012:


Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 11, 2012:


Obama’s Off-Mic Remarks to Medvedev Confirm His True Goal: Full Nuclear Disarmament, Say National Security Experts!Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Burke-On April 10, 2012:


ForgeryGate: Blackmailed By Putin, Obama Betrays United States And Her Allies!Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 7, 2012:


The Russian Deception!-Posted on Global Watch Report-On April 2012:


Is Barack Obama A Soviet Spy?Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On March 30, 2012:


Obama, The Russians, And Missile Defense: Historical Parallels!-Posted on Western Journalism-By PAUL G. KENGOR-On March 31, 2012:


Aw, How Nice Of You, Obama!!-Posted on Western Journalism-By MICHAEL REAGAN-On March 31, 2012:


Newt Gingrich Talks About Obama’s Russian “bend-over-and-grab-your-ankles”!-Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On March 27, 2012:


Obama’s ‘Flexibility’ on Missile Defense!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Rick Moran-On March 27, 2012:


Obama tells Russia he will have ‘more flexibility’ after election!-Posted on The Hill-By Alicia M. Cohn-On March 26, 2012:


Obama Tells Secrets To Russia!-Posted on DickMorris.com-By Dick Morris-On March 21, 2012:


Obama Will Give Missile Tech To Russia Despite Law!Posted on Western Journalism-By CRAIG COVELLO-On January 19, 2012:


Medvedev: Russia May Target US Missile Defense Sites!Posted on NewsMax.com-On November 24, 2011:


Russia Fumes Over U.S. Missile Defense Ship!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On June 14, 2011:


The Administration Must Not Bend to Russian Missile Defense DemandsPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 21, 2011:


Russia Warns US on Missile Plan, Balks on STARTPosted on NewsMax.com-On February 7, 2011:


President Obama Signs START Treaty, Doesn’t Allow Reporters in the RoomPosted on ABCNews.com-By Jake Tapper-On February 02, 2011:


Russia: Obama Signed Away Missile DefensesPosted on NewsMax.com-By William Chedsey-On January 5, 2011:


Video: Michelle Bachmann Says Obama Makes Us Less SafePosted on ExposeObama.com-On January 4, 2011:


Morning Bell: Merry Christmas, MoscowPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On December 22, 2010:


Stop, Don’t START!-Posted on Patriot Update-By Michael Reagan-On December 10, 2010:


Beijing’s Build-up and New START: ‘An arms-control treaty between the U.S. and Russia could advantage China.’Posted on National Review Online-By PETER BROOKES-On December 9, 2010:


Morning Bell: This New START Is A Bad Deal At Any TimePosted on The Heritage Foundation-On December 1, 2010:


The Threat of New START: ‘New START logic: Russia poses no military threat, but we need New START immediately to protect us from the Russian military threat.’Posted on National Review Online-By KEITH B. PAYNE &
TOM SCHEBER-On November 15, 2010:


Obama, Clinton, Gates Pushing for ‘Lame-Duck’ Ratification of New Arms-Reduction TreatyPosted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On November 5, 2010:


START treaty passes first testPosted on The Hill-By J. Taylor Rushing-On September 16, 2010:


Morning Bell: The New START Rubberstamp Threat to National SecurityPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 16, 2010:


Morning Bell: Neglecting Allies and Appeasing FoesPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 8, 2010:


Time to START Standing Up for AmericaPosted on Town Hall-By Phyllis Schlafly-On August 31, 2010:


Morning Bell: Let’s Not Make a DealPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On July 27, 2010:


Morning Bell: New START, New Slogan … Trust But Don’t Verify-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On July 23, 2010:


New START’s Many Problems: What the Experts SayPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On July 15, 2010:


Experts: New START is a Non-StarterPosted on The Heritage Foundation-By Peter Brookes and Owen Graham-On July 7, 2010:


Russian Spy Suspects Plead Guilty as Part of a SwapPosted on The New York Times-By BENJAMIN WEISER, COLIN MOYNIHAN and ELLEN BARRY-On July 8, 2010:


U.S. Arrests 10 on Charges of Being Agents for RussiaPosted on The New York Times-By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS-On June 28, 2010:


Morning Bell: No Rush to Judgment on New START-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On June 24, 2010:


Missile defense deal?Posted on The Washington Times-By Bill Gertz-On June 16, 2010:


Morning Bell: The New START Threat to Missile DefensePosted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 18, 2010:


Morning Bell: Obama is No Reagan on Nuclear StrategyPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 12, 2010:


Obama Disarmament Tack Puts U.S. in PerilPosted on NewsMax.com-By Frank Gaffney-On April 12, 2010:


The Obama Administration’s Ballistic Missile Defense Program: Treading Water in Shark-Infested SeasPosted on The Heritage Foundation-By Baker Spring-On April 8, 2010:


Morning Bell: Obama’s False STARTPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 8, 2010:


Missile Defense Issue Remains A Sticking Point in U.S.-Russia Arms-Reduction PactPosted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough, International Writer-On April 7, 2010:


Obama will Shy Away from Nuclear Crisis with Israel’Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 7, 2010:


Obama Weakens AmericaPosted on GlennBeck.com-By Glenn Beck-On April 6, 2010:


Morning Bell: The Road to a New Nuclear Arms RacePosted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 6, 2010:


Obama calls nuclear strategy ‘significant step’Posted on Chron.com-By ROBERT BURNS and DESMOND BUTLER, Associated Press Writers-On April 6, 2010:


Despite U.S. Push for Sanctions, Iran Is Missing From U.N. Security Council’s April AgendaPosted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On April 6, 2010:


Lieberman: Iran Bomb ‘Turning Point in History’Posted on NewsMax.com-On April 4, 2010:


Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear ArmsPosted on The New York Times-By DAVID E. SANGER and PETER BAKER-On April 5, 2010:


A DUMB POLICY ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS: DOES IT MATTER?Posted on PowerLineBlog.com-On April 5, 2010:


Obama Completes Arms Control Deal With RussiaPosted on the New York Times-By PETER BAKER and HELENE COOPER-On March 26, 2010:


The New York Times and Missile DefensePosted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 25, 2010:


Missile Defense Is What Really MattersPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 23, 2010:


Obama’s Weak Missile Defense NomineePosted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 12, 2010:


The Increasing Ballistic Missile ThreatPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On February 8, 2010:


Missile Defense to be Tested, but Questions About U.S. Security RemainPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On January 19, 2010:


Obama Popular in Europe, but He’s Not Doing Much for U.S. Interests AbroadPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On January 19, 2010:


Video: Ex CIA Ray McGovern on Obama’s policy towards Russia!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TheRealNews-On December 14, 2008:


Note: These articles and/or blog posts relate to and/or support my blog posts-You Decide:

National Security Shouldn’t Be For Sale!


Nuclear Summit Part of Obama Administration’s ‘Fantasy Foreign Policy’!


Is Pelosi Wrong On Defense Spending?


Analysis: NKorea’s Bomb Test Adds To Atomic Threat!


The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!


33 Minutes-Protecting America During New Missile Age:


Ongoing Concerns With This President and His Administration!


Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!


Does Our President Hate America?


Where Is America Today?


Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!


Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!


A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:


“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question:  Are we to believe that ACORN is really disbanding?

The following articles and/or blog posts and video reveal the disturbing answer to this question-You Decide:

ACORN disbanding because of money woes, scandal-Posted on ABCLocal.go.com-By Associated Press-On March 22, 2010:


These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“CHICAGO — The once mighty liberal activist group ACORN announced Monday it is folding amid falling revenues — six months after video footage emerged showing some of its workers giving tax tips to conservative activists posing as a pimp and prostitute.

“It’s really declining revenue in the face of a series of attacks from partisan operatives and right-wing activist that have taken away our ability to raise the resources we need,” ACORN spokesman Kevin Whelan said.

Several of its largest affiliates, including ACORN New York and ACORN California, broke away this year and changed their names in a bid to ditch the tarnished image of their parent organization and restore revenue that ran dry in the wake of the video scandal. They will continue to operate under their new names and aren’t affected by ACORN’s decision to shut down.

ACORN, whose network spanned some 40 states, was a favorite Republican target even before the video brouhaha. But its financial situation and reputation went into free fall within days of the videos’ release in September, and even Democratic backers began scattering. Congress reacted by yanking ACORN’s federal funding, private donors held back cash and scores of ACORN offices closed.

Earlier this month, a U.S. judge reiterated an earlier ruling that the federal law blacklisting ACORN and groups allied with it was unconstitutional because it singled them out. But that didn’t mean any money would be automatically be restored.

Bertha Lewis, the CEO of ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, alluded to financial hardships in a weekend statement as the group’s board prepared to deliberate by phone.

“ACORN has faced a series of well-orchestrated, relentless, well-funded right wing attacks that are unprecedented since the McCarthy era,” she said. “The videos were a manufactured, sensational story that led to rush to judgment and an unconstitutional act by Congress.”

ACORN’s board decided to close remaining state affiliates and field offices by April 1 because of falling revenues, with some national operations continuing to operate for at least several weeks before shutting for good, Whelan said Monday.

Longtime ACORN critics sounded skeptical that the group would fade away for good. Matthew Vadum, of the conservative Washington,D.C.-based think tank the Capital Research Center, said on Monday he fully expects the organization and its leaders to bounce back in some form.

“ACORN isn’t going away, it’s just changing shape,” he said. “They’re like the T-1000 (android) assassin in that futuristic ‘Terminator’ movie. Every time it gets blasted apart, the liquid metal would just keep coming back together.”

As recently as this year, the 40-year-old ACORN boasted it could draw on 400,000 members to lobby for liberal causes, such as raising the minimum wage or adopting universal health care. ACORN was arguably most successful at registering hundreds of thousands of low-income voters, though that mission was dogged by fraud allegations, including that some workers submitted forms signed by ‘Mickey Mouse’ or other cartoon characters.

Conservative critics have also raised doubts that the affiliates that dropped the ACORN brand can rightly claim to have made a clean break and started anew, noting that most have kept the same offices and staff they had before their name switch.

Whelan, the ACORN spokesman, declined to provide any figures on the group’s current financial situation.

Some of the breakaway affiliates have conceded they’ve been devastated by the video fallout.

But one of the latest of the ACORN affiliates to adopt a new name — Chicago-based ACORN Housing, which is now called the Affordable Housing Centers of America — had been one of the best-funded affiliates. The federal cutoff slashed its budget 75 percent, from $24 million in 2009 to $6 million in 2010, forcing it to cut its 250-member staff in half, its director, Mike Shea, said earlier this month.

With name changes, California ACORN is now Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, and New York ACORN has become New York Communities for Change. The breakaways have insisted that they have changed in more than just name, pointing to tougher ethics rules and better management.”

ACORN ‘dissolved as a national structure’Posted on Politico-By Ben Smith-On February 22, 2010:


Video: Damage Control: “ACORN looks to repair tarnished image by changing its name”-Posted on VideoFoxNews.Com-On June 22, 2009:


Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and/or support the above articles and/or blog posts and videos-You Decide:

Justice Department Coordinates Suits With ACORN’s Project Vote!Posted on The Examiner-By Examiner Editorial-On January 19, 2012:


The Rebranding of ACORN!Special Report posted on Judicial Watch-On August 22, 2011:


Documents Reveal Coordination Between ACORN Affiliate and Justice Department Voting Section!-Posted on Big Government-By J. Christian Adams-On December 14, 2011:


Obama administration, GAO appear to have ignored group’s ACORN affiliation to award $700K!-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Matthew Boyle – The Daily Caller-On November 28, 2011:


Was The Bank Of America ‘Occupation’ A Coordinated, ACORN-Affiliated Attack?Posted on The Blaze-By Billy Hallowell-On November 21, 2011:


Massive ‘bait-and-switch’ purloins school donations?-Posted on WND.com-On November 13, 2011:


ACORN Officials Scramble, Firing Workers and Shredding Documents, After Exposed as Players Behind Occupy Wall Street Protests!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Jana Winter-On November 03, 2011:


Exclusive: ACORN Playing Behind Scenes Role in ‘Occupy’ Movement!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Jana Winter-On October 26, 2011:


Video: ACORN Behind Occupy Wall Street Movement!!!Posted on YouTube.com-By MOXNEWSd0tCOM-On October 26, 2011:


Obama’s HUD execs deliver $730,000 to ACORN spinoffs!Posted on WND.com-On September 24, 2011:


Obama’s ‘Jobs Bill’ Makes ACORN Eligible for $15 Billion in Taxpayer Money!Posted on Pjamas Media-By Matthew Vadum-On September 15, 2011:


ACORN operative admits ‘voter fraud’: ‘Americans are sick and tired of having the votes of law-abiding citizens canceled out’!-Posted on WND.com-On September 13, 2011:


Misleading Words!-Posted on The Patriot Update-By Thomas Sowell-On August 3, 2011:


Nightmarish Group Back From Dead to Undermine Your Bank!-Posted on WND.com-On July 31, 2011:


Eric Holder’s Newest Witch Hunt!Posted on Townhall-By Bob Beauprez-On July 31, 2011:


Obama’s HUD Violated ACORN Funding Ban!-Posted on Judicial Watch-On June 29, 2011:


Appeals Court Rules Against ACORNPosted on Judicial Watch-On August 16, 2010:


ACORN: Tea Parties = bowel movementPosted on GlennBeck.com-By Glenn Beck-On April 22, 2010:


President Obama Is Still a Community Organizer: “President Obama is still a community organizer, it’s just on a much bigger scale with much higher stakes”-Posted on GlennBeck.Blogs.FoxNews.com-On June 16, 2009:


Organizer in Chief: “Barack Obama could become our first community-activist president”Posted on City Journal-Summer 2008-By STEVEN MALANGA:


Note:  The above articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and/or support my following blog posts-You Decide:

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!


Community Action Network (AKA: ACORN) members shut down L.A. City Council meeting!


The Reason for the Treason!


Are the Cracks Beginning to Show in a Radical Agenda Many Believe Was Crafted by the President and ACORN?


New York Times Finally Admits It Spiked Obama/ACORN Corruption Story!


ACORN-The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-Automaker Labor Unions:


President Obama and ACORN Connection!


Does This Administration’s Use of Alinsky’s Rules Include Extortion?


Where Is America Today?


Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!


A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:


“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question: Could it be true that America awoke today one step closer to being a socialist nation?

This recent blog post seems to give us the eye-opening and shocking answer to this question-You Decide:

The Reason for the TreasonPosted on LaiglesForum.com-By Don Hank-On March 22, 2010:



These are pertinent excerpts from this eye-opening blog post:

“America awoke to socialism this morning. The globalist Left has struck: In the midst of our worst ever economic downturn, the Old Order: health insurance you can’t afford personally, has been replaced by the New Order: health insurance we can’t afford collectively.

We are closer to slavery now and frightened people are asking: will we ever be free again?

Not if we remain ignorant.

The only way the last of the free peoples on earth can still hope to defeat our enemy the globalist Left (in all political parties) at this late hour is

1 — to recognize that the Left may vary superficially over geography and time but under the surface it is essentially the same everywhere all the time,

2 — to study the enemy’s past actions so that we know what to expect, and then

3 — develop strategies based on what we learn about this peculiar phenomenon.

I am now reading two treatises that I strongly recommend for those who wish to understand the destruction of our Western culture, society, democratic systems and economy:

Russian dissident and Soviet Academy of Sciences member Igor Shafarevich’s “The Socialist Phenomenon”:


Shafarevich traces the earliest socialist thought back to Plato and then to the Christian heretics of the 13th century and beyond.

Nine Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by Epoch Times


Though the Chinese analysts wrote this years ago, the salient “inherited” traits of the CCP that they describe match up perfectly with those of the Western Left. I am astounded to see how all of this resembles the kind of governance we are seeing throughout the Western world, in our “national” governments and in the intergovernmental entities like the EU, UN and their spinoffs.

Here is their list of the Left’s inherited traits (along with corresponding examples from today’s Western world):

deceit (man made global warming and carbon credit scam, Obama’s suspicious birth certificate and claim that taxes would not increase for the middle clase, the Feds insisting we needed a bailout for their rich friends to “save” us),

incitement (class hatred through special privileges for minorities, eg, affirmative action, free college for illegal aliens, Liberation Theology),

unleashing the scum of society (ACORN, La Raza, millions of illegal-alien criminals loose in the US),

espionage and infiltration (the GOP is now so “progressive” it is hardly distinguishable from the Democrat Party in many ways. Arlen Specter’s defection is dramatic evidence of how the Left plants infiltrators. Vladimir Bukovsky, a Soviet dissident, says he saw Russian documentation showing that the current form of the European Union was a Soviet idea that was implemented by stealth in Europe at the instigation of Soviet operatives),

– sowing dissension (Tea Party and true conservatives vs the RINOs, who now control the GOP),

disintegration and replacement (there are virtually no functional US borders and we treat illegal aliens as though they were citizens, with free medical care, education, welfare, etc. European countries now fly the EU flag instead of their own national flags. European “national” legislation tracks EU legislation, hostile Muslims fill their cities. The whole of Western culture is disintegrating and being replaced).

Yesterday a German friend wrote me pondering why the EU is doing so much to destroy everything. He has studied the issue extensively, but said he couldn’t really figure it out. Neither can my UK friends. What would be the motive of the “elites” in destroying the West?

I had no response and found myself asking for God’s guidance and wisdom.

Then last night, I was reading a chapter of Shafarevich’s book about the socialist “Christian” heretics of the 14th and 15th centuries who burned churches, slaughtered the opposition, banned marriage, destroyed and confiscated property. At different times they carried out their murder and plunder unopposed. The reason given for their unnecessarily cruel and blood thirsty behavior was chilling from today’s perspective, because it shows that nothing substantive has changed since then. The reason for the insanity, identified by the authors based on historical records:

to destroy the old order and all traditions.

Then today I was reading the second chapter of the Nine Commentaries linked above, in reference to the Chinese communists. According to the Chinese dissident authors, the motive of the Chinese communists for killing millions of their countrymen and destroying their country was:

All traditions and the old order must be destroyed

This a.m. I was reading the local paper about how Panama is cashing in on carbon credits. The EU is paying them to build hydroelectric plants because they don’t burn coal.

But here is some background:

1 — Europeans are being snookered into paying millionaire investors here in Panama to carry out plans they already intended to implement. There is plenty of water in the rivers and hydroelectric power is all Panama has ever known. No coal fired plants have ever been used. In other words, the entrepreneurs needed no further incentive to build the hydroelectric plants because Panama needed them anyway. NOTHING was accomplished by making these payments (like the Corus Redcar scam in the UK, which cost 7,400 jobs and 1 billion pounds). It was money thrown away at a time when Europe is in a dire economic crisis.

2 — The people building the plant are rich entrepreneurs. No money is being sent to this “Third World” country that will help the poor here. In fact, the local papers complain that there is no law stipulating that the money be used to “help the community.” It is going from the pockets of strapped European workers into the bank accounts of rich Panamanians.

3 — Panama is already one of the richest countries in the region, possibly the banking center of Latin America, and on top of that, because of its common sense lending practices, has very low indebtedness and no banking crisis, quite unlike the European countries acting as “rich” benefactors!

The only reason for the carbon credit scam on top of a financial and economic crisis can be total destruction of the old order in Europe including its economy.

This is the reason behind everything. Even the rich bankers involved in the destruction of our Western economies don’t care even about themselves and their own fortunes and families as much as they care about our destruction. The main reason seems to be that they think there are too many of us. WE, the OLD GENERATION and our ways, must be exterminated at all costs to suit their mad designs!

God help us.

And indeed, He is our only help. The underlying reason behind this is truly a spiritual one. There can be all kinds of explanations offered as to why people would want to destroy all things traditional, including family. But only a spiritual one satisfies totally when you consider the suicidal nature of the onslaught, that is, the damage they do to themselves and their indifference to the poor and downtrodden. Thus, objectively speaking, in view of the fact that nothing is broken and needs fixed, the best explanation is that there really is a Satan, as this article on Karl Marx suggests:


But in a spiritual sense, why, if God is real, does He allow all the evil and the pain and suffering for the little guy?

The West needs a dramatic demonstration of just why the Left and the global elite have nothing to offer but lies and pain. Likewise we need a convincing demonstration that spiritual evil cannot be combated by material means. The existence of such sheer senseless evil everywhere suggests that we need God. More importantly, this evidence of the existence of evil on the spiritual plane – pure gratuitous evil for its own sake – is, by the same token, and simultaneously, evidence of the existence of a God who wants to make it all better and heal us, if only we will submit to His guidance.

No better way of showing Himself could ever have been devised than to present such strong evidence of the existence of evil. No stronger motive for accepting our spiritual Savior could have been floated than that of overcoming this evil to save ourselves, first as a purely material motive and then as a spiritual one. We ought to thank God for this while taking steps to arrest the damage and punish the evil doers.

Instead we go on killing the unborn, deliberately and pointedly flouting the scriptures, openly celebrating sexual promiscuity, promoting same-sex “marriage”, unwed motherhood, divorce, drug abuse, atheism, “religious” Leftism, disenfranchisement of good and decent people, and all the rest. Why?

Because we have been told, again: “you will not surely die.”

It’s the same lie as always and we bought it again.”

Note:  These articles and videos relate to and/or support the above blog post-You Decide:

Obama-Backed Financial Reform Bill Would Create New Bureaucracy with Power to Subpoena ‘Any Data’ from ‘Any Financial Company’-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On April 06, 2010:


IRS Launches New Global Program to Target ‘High Wealth Individuals’Posted on CNSNews.com-By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer-On April 6, 2010:


Napolitano: Supreme Court to Strike Down ObamacarePosted on NewsMax.com-By David A. Patten-On March 26, 2010:


That’s No Angry Mob: Dissent Used to be Patriotic, Now It’s Something the Left FearsPosted on PJTV-On March 26, 2010:


Caterpillar: Health care bill would cost it $100M-Posted on Chicago Tribune-By José Moré/Chicago Tribune-On March 19, 2010:


45% Of Doctors Would Consider Quitting If Congress Passes Health Care OverhaulPosted on Investor’s Business Daily-By TERRY JONES-On September 15, 2009:


The Baucus Individual Health Insurance Mandate: Taxing Low-Incomeand Moderate-Income WorkersPosted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 5, 2009:


A Tyrannical ActPosted on CNSNews-By Terence P. Jeffrey–On March 24, 2010:


Despite Federal Mandates, Obama Says Health Care Law Helps Small BusinessesPosted CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On March 26, 2010:


Castro Endorses ObamacarePosted on CNSNews.com-On March 26, 2010:


CBO Says Govt to Collect $69 Billion in Tax Penalties From Health Care Law’s Insurance Mandate in First 10 YearsPosted on CNSNews.com-By Matt Cover, Staff Writer-On March 24, 2010:


Republican Lawmaker Expects Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of Health Care Law’s Individual MandatePosted on CNSNews.com-By Nicholas Baliasy-On March 24, 2010:


In Health Bill, Obama Attacks Wealth InequalityPosted on The New York Times-By DAVID LEONHARDT-On March 24, 2010:


Dick Armey: ‘Emboldened Obama’ Just Getting Started on Expanding GovernmentPosted on NewsMax.com-By David A. Patten-On March 23, 2010:


Morning Bell: Congress vs. The American PeoplePosted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 23, 2010:


Palin Assails Healthcare Process as ‘Corrupt’Posted on NewsMax.com-By David A. Patten-On March 23, 2010:


Obama Promised ‘Public Option’ in Winning VotePosted on NewsMax.com-By Theodore Kettle-On March 23, 2010:


Sharpton: America ‘Overwhelmingly Voted For Socialism When They Elected Obama”Posted on NewsMax.Com-On March 22, 2010:


Ron Paul: Stupak Deal Unconstitutional-Posted on NewsMax.com-On March 22, 2010:


States launch lawsuits against healthcare planPosted on Reuters.com-By Karen PierogOn March 22, 2010:


Health overhaul promises pain, gain for businesses-Posted on Yahoo News-By MATTHEW PERRONE, AP Business Writer-On March 22, 2010:


Exclusive: Pelosi Defends Health Care Fight Tactics: “Pelosi Says Dems Must Stand Their Ground When There Is No Common GroundPosted on ABCNews.Com-By MARGARET ARO and MARK MOONEY-On March 22, 2010:


The 2009 Food ‘Safety’ Bills Harmonize Agribusiness Practices in Service of Corporate Global GovernancePosted on FarmWars.info-By Nicole Johnson-On March 22, 2010:


What Now? The Next Fight Over Obamacare: It Ain’t OverPosted on PJTV-On March 22, 2010:


ABC – Las Vegas: “Showdown in Searchlight” to be Historic Event in TownPosted on YouTube-By OurCountryPAC-On March 22, 2010:


Note: The above blog post, articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and/or support my following blog posts-You Decide:

Health Care Reform: “The Perils of Inaction and the Promise of Effective Action”


Obama Czar’s Shocking Communist Connections!


Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection!


Is Obama and The American Public on Different Pages, If Not Different Books?


Who’s Behind the Financial Crisis?


Social Studies Teachers Share Strategies on How to Mold Students:


Nearly 1/2 of U.S. Citizens Are Now Saying That Obama Is Not A Legitimate President!


What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and is It Something That We Should Know More About?


Is Obama Employing the Cloward-Piven Strategy?


The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!


‘Game Change’:  New Book Reveals 2008 Campaigns’ Messy Moments-To Include Racism!


Are Intelligence Personnel Empowered to Employ Their Ingenuity and Resourcefulness to Connect The Dots?


Backsliding On National Security: The Immigration Connection


Europe’s Looming Demise: Changes on the Continent Cloud Our Future!


Radical Movement’s Leader Forecasts America’s Demise:


Homosexuals in the Military:


The Strange Case of Kevin Jennings!


Tyrannical Takeover of Our Financial Services Sector By the Federal Government!


Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government-Why?


Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:


Where Is America Today?


Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!


Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!


A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:



“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »