Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2009

QuestionWhat action have you taken to educate yourself regarding the eligibility status of our newly elected President or are one those individuals that think that the issue is “frivolous” and/or mute and are confident that he meets the “Natural Born Citizen” eligibility requirement to be our President?

If you are one of those individuals that takes what our Main Stream Media dishes out as the bible truth and believe that this eligibility issue is “frivolous” and/or mute and just another partisan attempt to discredit our first African-American President the following article and/or blog post is for you because it should hopefully wake you up and motivate you to take some urgent and time sensitive action to educate yourself on this critical issue and join the cause by standing up for and defending those rights given us under our “Constitution” before they’re taken away from all of us-You Decide:

Exclusive: A Letter to Rupert Murdoch on the Obama Birth Certificate Question: By John D. Hemenway, Esq.-On May 14, 2009:

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3320/pub_detail.asp

These are pertinent excerpts from this article and/or blog post:

“Editor’s note: The following is a letter written by John D. Hemenway, Esq. that was sent to NewsCorp CEO Rupert Murdoch via certified mail.

May 14, 2009

Dear Rupert,

You will likely not have retained a clear memory of me from Worcester College in the early fifties. Much time has elapsed from when we both read “P.P.E.” under Asa Briggs and the others. I had looked forward to cementing our friendship when the death of your father caused you simply to “disappear” from those at Worcester.

Much later, during several visits to my Washington, D.C. home, my moral tutor, David Mitchell, filled me in on the magnificent assistance you provided the College. Perhaps you also had something to do with the “Mitchell Building” erected just off Walton Street.

Everyone who shares your views is pleased at the nearly unprecedented success story you have made of your life. I was very pleased when you became an American, even if some persons attributed your motivation as calculated to expand your economic interests. Pure jealousy! You and your accomplishments have been good for us all.

From time to time, I try to keep up with interesting details concerning your news empire. From that reading, I am certain you and I have many opinions in common. I subscribe to the N.Y. Post, which one can acknowledge is “tabloidish,” but describes real N.Y. City life and the Post’s editorial staff certainly offers solid opinions pertaining to U.S. governmental problems. “Fox News” also makes an outstanding contribution to public awareness of the issues confronting the country.

You may recall the vital contribution Worcester’s Provost John Masterman made to the winning of WWII; he was a key figure, as I remember, in organizing the counter-espionage effort against the Nazis. I write you now concerning a problem nearly of that magnitude.

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman, N.Y. Post

1211 Avenue of the America

New York, N.Y. 10036

That problem is this: the man now occupying the White House is likely Constitutionally unqualified to hold the office. As an adopted American, you will have studied the U.S. Constitution better than many Americans, and from P.P.E. studies know that the Constitution has flexible clauses and hard, literal clauses. One of the latter is the requirement of Article II, Section 1, which states:  “No person except a natural-born citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of the President.”

There are indications that Obama cannot meet that requirement. As an attorney, I facilitated a lawsuit (Hollister vs. Soetoro et al.) in the United States District Court (D.C. Circuit) demanding that Obama produce his birth certificate or satisfactory substitute evidence. There are about 20 similar lawsuits across the nation. In my case, U.S. District Court Judge Robertson (a Clinton appointee), who summarily dismissed the case, and is rumored to be seeking an Obama appointment, wrote that Obama’s eligibility had been “blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry.” In other words, he accepted internet “blogs” in lieu of actual evidence.

He ordered me to “show cause” why I should not be sanctioned for promotion of a “frivolous” lawsuit. (It is significant that, although dismissed, none of the twenty odd similar legal actions have been designated by the responsible judge as “frivolous.”)

Other lawsuits have usually been dismissed for “lack of standing” including a lawsuit brought by Presidential candidate, Ambassador Alan Keyes. If anyone has standing, it is an actual Presidential contender. I provided Judge Robertson 37 pages of explanation as to “why I should not be held in contempt” and he decided to “reprimand” me instead of his threatened sanctions. That case is now under appeal.

Any rational person with even partial knowledge of the facts must know that Obama-cum-Soetoro is desperate to conceal something he does not want known. I believe he is hiding the fact that he and his campaign conspired to assert eligibility for the Presidential office to which he well may not be entitled. In other parts of the world, this would be known as a coup d’etat.

Yet, “mainstream” news services, members of officialdom, judges, including justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have all failed to demand documentation to prove or disprove Obama’s qualifications to serve in the White House.

It is as if a 53% vote is a substitute for an actual determination of the legal qualifications of Obama to be President. It is also evident that consequential people in America all believe the “vetting” of qualifications to be a presidential candidate should have been someone else’s responsibility. Revelation of this massive collapse of the fundamentals of the electoral process (ensuring candidate eligibility) at this point would make some very important people look hopelessly incompetent and inept.

Sadly, that includes your “Fox News.” There are reports that top management of Fox instructed its commentators to stay away from the subject – a strange position for a service that deservedly won a reputation for “fair and balanced” reporting. I cannot believe that you would issue such an order, with your good sense. Was it Roger Ailes or someone else? When I worked with Accuracy in Media (AIM) several decades ago, news manipulation by Ailes never filled the staff with confidence. On May 1, Sean Hannity referred to Ailes as his “boss!”

It is also disturbing that a report circulates that a Saudi national who bought enough stock to win a seat on the board of Fox’s parent company, a Saudi prince, asked you to stop Fox from referring to Muslim youth unrest as “Muslim” riots – he boasted later at a conference in Dubai, that after a phone call to you, thirty minutes later, Fox removed the banner from the bottom of its screen, “Muslim” riots. Given this revelation, many FOX devotees are wondering why the eligibility issue has been ignored by your network.

This constitutional question is one of vital importance to the U.S. It is not as if we wanted to startle our contemporaries with actions calculated to stir up our contemporaries as you once did at Worcester with your bust of Lenin. Or as I did when ruffling feathers of our stuffy dean (who guarded the door of “his” library from allowing anyone actually to touch one of his rare books). After you left for Australia to tend to family problems, I hung a huge American flag from the windows of the Nuffield Building on the 4th of July. The dean’s order (conveyed to me by my scout) still rings in my ears, “Take that damn thing down!”

The “natural-born” clause in our Constitution is a rigid, not a flexible clause. In that respect, it is analogous to the banning of “cruel or unusual” punishments, a clause dear to the hearts of our founding fathers. They certainly heard tales from their grandfathers drawn directly from English experience of ingenious cruelties accompanying the crime of “Regicide” after “dictator” Oliver Cromwell died peacefully in his bed. The fact that the English could not devise a way to govern themselves without inviting the king back may suggest that you modify somewhat your prediction (which I read somewhere) that this will be the last British generation that will live under a monarchy! I recall the first review of my educational “progress” at term’s end in “Hall” at Worcester when David Mitchell described my understanding of English history as limited to “King John was a bad king!”

Since you are now an American, and a good one, too, I have no doubt that you will seek to support the Constitution every way you think wise. Consider that, having won election on a campaign that promised “openness and transparency,” Obama now has spent close to $1 million for concealment of his birth and academic records, which are the only means to prove his eligibility. A birth certificate would cost less than $20.00 to request from the State of Hawaii.

Obama has produced no documents at all that would support his claim to eligibility to office. Is it no longer responsible to claim that “the public has a right to know the truth?” Moreover, even if born in Hawaii, as he claims, Obama’s travel to Pakistan (when Americans reportedly were banned from travel there) in 1981 raises other, complicated issues.

Why did his supporters produce a misleading “certification of live birth” instead of an actual vault birth certificate? Forensic experts have testified that the Certification of Live Birth is a forgery; written on a laser printer, when such printers were not available in 1961.

This evokes shades of Richard Nixon’s problems with typewriters (not just once, re: Alger Hiss; but a second time, when Nixon was caught back-dating documents for the I.R.S.) It makes me proud that in his secret tapes, Nixon referred to me, saying, “Fire the son-of-a-bitch, he’s done this before!” – a reference to my testimony before the Senate against incompetent or dishonest Nixon appointees, such as Helmut Sonnenfeldt (known locally as “Kissinger’s Kissinger) who failed confirmation as Deputy Secretary of Treasury because of my testimony before the Senate Finance Committee.

I also testified against the first “career” foreign service officer ever to fail confirmation in the 182 year history of the U.S. Senate: Howard Mace, who was Director of Personnel of the Department of State, who lost his appointment as Ambassador to Sierra Leone. Senate testimony may ultimately prove useful in this Obama matter, despite the composition of the Congress at this time.

Nixon’s firing order directly led me to study law at Howard University, the prestigious largely African-American University in Washington, D.C. Nixon’s denunciation of me, in fact, boosted me in the eyes of the Dean at Howard and got me to this point.

In conclusion, I can tell you this as fact. America badly needed your brilliant creation: Fox News. But if Fox News really is to be a voice for rational conservatism in the United States, it cannot ignore this vital constitutional question: We have a man occupying the White House who refuses to disclose the very documents that would legitimate his Presidency. Was it not a cover-up that undid Richard Nixon? Please instruct your personnel from Roger Ailes on down that they are encouraged (not forbidden) to report all of the news, including that pertaining to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

With best regards, your supporter, friend, and admirer, John D. Hemenway”

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributor John D. Hemenway, Esq. is a World War II veteran, Naval Academy graduate and a Rhodes scholar.”

Note:  My following blog posts will give you some idea of the peaceful and legal action that I have taken on this issue as a means of standing up for and defending our “Constitutional Rights”, which I take the liberty of sharing with you in hopes that you join the cause by taking the same or similar action as it relates to this time sensitive and urgent issue-You Decide:

Letters & E-Mails Requesting President Obama’s Eligibility Status!

This blog post contains a copy of a letter and/or email that I have sent to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor-US Attorney for the District of Columbia, my NM US Congressman, my NM US Senators and our Albuquerque FBI Field Office relating to this issue:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/letters-e-mails-sent-requesting-president-obama’s-eligibility-status/

President Obama’s Eligibility Status Press Release!

This blog post contains a Press Release that I e-mailed to all news media outlets relating to this issue:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/

Question:  Are you aware that a large majority of our senior citizen’s and numerous other Americans that do not have access to and/or are not internet savvy are literally being kept in the dark when it comes to the President’s eligibility requirements under Article II, Section I of our Constitution and other negative issues affecting our country because they rely solely on the Main Stream Media (MSM) to educate themselves while our President, his administration and minions covertly erode our “Constitutional Rights” and ultimately destroy this great country of ours.

This blog post contains an article that reveals a concerted effort by World Net Daily to bring the President’s eligibility issue to the forefront by erecting billboards around the country asking where the President’s missing birth certificate is, which I believe is a great idea, but some Americans seem to be concerned that the billboards may not contain enough information to get the most bang for the buck because the President’s name does not appear on them and, as I mentioned above, many individuals still have no idea that there is a problem with the President’s eligibility status, which revolves around the missing original (long form-vault copy) of his birth certificate:

Senior Citizens & Others Disgustingly Kept In Dark About President’s Eligibility Status By The MSM!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/24/senior-citizens-others-disgustingly-kept-in-dark-by-the-msm/

Comment: I donated to the cause of erecting billboards as a means of educating the American public regarding this disturbing issue.

Note:The above articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and/or support my following blog posts-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/why-obama-is-ineligible-–-regardless-of-his-birthplace/

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/hawaii-elections-clerk-obama-birth-not-here/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Where Is America Today?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-obamas-resignation/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america-2/

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/disclaimer/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Question: Has it ever crossed your mind that President Obama might be suffering from a Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), like other leaders, who in time are proven to be subtle, refined, socially-adept, manipulative, possessed of thespian skills, overly convincing, lacking of empathy and are ruthless and relentlessly driven, as evidenced by the numerous controversial actions taken by him during the first few months of his administration?

This peace written by Joseph Farah, editor and CEO of WorldNetDaily, provides you with his own diagnosis of President Obama’s state of mind, along with evidence that supports that diagnosis-You Decide:

“I KNOW.  “Is Barack Obama Crazy?” is a pretty provocative subject for an email.  I admit, I don’t know the answer to the question.

But, given Barack Obama’s actions in the first few months of his administration, it’s a valid question.

And so, the May issue of WorldNetDaily’s acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine takes it on.

Let’s examine some of the evidence:

  • If you held a job and people were questioning your qualifications, and all you had to do to put an end to those questions, not to mention more than a dozen lawsuits filed against you, was to produce a valid birth certificate you claimed to possess, would you refuse to take that simple step? Or would you, as Obama has done, spend at least $1 million to fight the lawsuits? I think most people would agree that someone who chose the latter is either crazy or doesn’t have a valid birth certificate.
  • Let’s say you got a job in which you succeeded someone with whom you disagreed passionately. Would you try to have that person prosecuted over those differences, knowing that some day, someone with whom you disagree would succeed you and possibly contemplate the same course of action? That’s what Obama talked about doing in the case of his disagreement with George W. Bush over the practice of coercive interrogations – policies, I might point out, that were employed not just by his immediate predecessor, but by every war-time president in the history of the United States.
  • Or what do you make of Obama’s efforts to ban the use of the words “terror” and “terrorism” from his administration’s lexicon? The administration prefers to call attacks on terrorists “overseas contingency operations.” And terrorist attacks at home are referred to as “man-caused disasters.” These new terms are apparently considered less offensive to terrorists.
  • While there are hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens voluntarily serving in arms overseas, the Obama administration put out a report to law enforcement agencies throughout the country to be wary of returning veterans, because they might be more inclined to get involved in “right-wing extremist” activities.
  • Obama presides – legitimately or illegitimately – over a nation founded on the ideals of “independence” and “national sovereignty.” Yet, in a speech given in Prague, what was his prescription for making the world a better place? “All nations must come together to build a stronger, global regime,” he said.
  • How about his solution to an economic crisis spurred by too much indebtedness? More debt.
  • Let’s say you’re the first black president. Do you appoint a black attorney general who indicts the people who just elected you as a “nation of cowards” on matters of race?
  • Imagine appointing to a top policy position at the Defense Department, a columnist from the Los Angeles Times who believes U.S. policies were to blame for the 9/11 attacks by al-Qaida. That would be Rosa Brooks, who also previously referred to Obama’s immediate predecessor as “our torturer in chief “ and a “psychotic who need(s) treatment” while comparing Bush’s arguments for waging a war on terrorism to Adolf Hitler’s use of political propaganda.

I could go on, but I think you get the picture.

I don’t know if any of these actions mean the president is crazy. But I do know they mean he is dangerous to the security and prosperity of the nation.

For a more complete diagnosis, I refer you to the May issue of WND’s acclaimed Whistleblower magazine, titled NARCISSIST IN CHIEF: Experts explain what makes Barack Obama tick.”

Note: The following articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to this issue-You Decide:

Obama and the Narcissism of Big Differences!-Posted on The Wall Street Journal-By JOSEPH RAGO-On August 6, 2011:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903454504576486752134553990.html?mod=opinion_newsreel

LPAC-TV Interview With Sam Vakin: ‘Obama Is a Malignment Narcissist’Posted Scribd-By zadanliran:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/42788976/One-Narcissist-s-Reaction-to-Failure-and-Defeat

Hannity: Obama Detached, Obsessed With Critics, Sources SayPosted on NewsMax.com-On November 16, 2010:

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Sean-Hannity-critics-obsessed/2010/11/16/id/377235?s=al&promo_code=B225-1

NoteThe above diagnosis seems to relate to and/or support my following blog posts-You Decide:

Are We Witnessing Narcissism At Work?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/are-we-witnessing-narcissism-at-work/

Are We Witnessing Conversational Hypnosis At Work?

This blog post reveals an eye-opening document that contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis, which seem to make a good case that President Obama uses a little known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know, which he uses as a means of accomplishing his hidden agendaYou Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/17/are-we-witnessing-conversational-hypnosis-at-work/

Do Alinsky’s Rules Define This Administration’s Governing Style?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/do-alinsky’s-rules-define-this-administration’s-governing-style-2/

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:

This blog post contains a summary of the results of my extensive research into Senator Obama’s personal and career background, which I conducted as a means of educating myself prior to casting my ballot, that was completed on November 3, 2008 (two days prior to the election), along with a list of unanswered questions and numerous concerns relating to his lack of executive experience, seemingly shady background and his association with radical individuals and/or organizations (Tell me who you hang around with and I’ll tell you who you are!)-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

Where Is America Today?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/disclaimer/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question: Was Vice President Biden correct when he stated that President Obama would be tested by a National Security crisis within six months after taking office and could North Korea’s recent second underground test of a nuclear device and the test-firing of two short-range missiles Tuesday, after test-firing three short-range missiles Monday, be his test?

These articles seem to suggest that North Korea’s nuclear test makes it no likelier that the regime will actually launch a nuclear attack, but it adds a scary dimension to another threat: the defiant North as a facilitator of the atomic ambitions of others, potentially even terrorists-You Decide;

Analysis: NKorea’s bomb test adds to atomic threat: Posted on Yahoo! News-By Robert Burns, AP National Security Writer-On May 26, 2009:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090526/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_us_north_korea_analysis

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“WASHINGTON – North Korea’s nuclear test makes it no likelier that the regime will actually launch a nuclear attack, but it adds a scary dimension to another threat: the defiant North as a facilitator of the atomic ambitions of others, potentially even terrorists.

It also presents another major security crisis for President Barack Obama, already saddled with wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and a nuclear problem with Iran.

Obama assured the president of South Korea and the prime minister of Japan that the U.S. remains committed to the defense of their nations, the White House said in a statement following Obama’s calls to the leaders Monday night.

Obama and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak “agreed that the test was a reckless violation of international law that compels action in response,” the White House said.

“They agreed to work closely together to seek and support a strong United Nations Security Council resolution with concrete measures to curtail North Korea’s nuclear and missile activities.”

South Korea’s Yonhap news agency reported that North Korea had test-fired two short-range missiles Tuesday after test-firing three short-range missiles Monday.

It’s far from clear what diplomatic or other action the world community will take. So far, nothing they’ve done has worked.

At an earlier juncture of the long-running struggle to put a lid on North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, the administration of President Bill Clinton in the mid-1990s discussed with urgency the possibility of taking military action. That seems less likely now, with the North evidently nuclear-armed and the international community focused first on continuing the search for a nonmilitary solution.

Meeting in emergency session in New York, the U.N. Security Council on Monday condemned North Korea’s nuclear test as a clear violation of a previous U.N. resolution banning such testing. The council said it would begin work immediately on a new legally binding resolution.

Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said Tuesday that the resolution “will have teeth in it, and I expect additional sanctions.

“The pressure will increase on North Korea economically and otherwise, and North Korea will recognize that its actions have only left it further isolated, and further debilitated,” Rice said on CBS’ “The Early Show.”

The North’s announcement that it conducted its second underground test of a nuclear device drew quick condemnation across the globe, including from its big neighbor and traditional ally, China.

The Obama administration, which said the North’s action invited stronger, unspecified international pressure, has consistently called for Korean denuclearization but seemed not to have anticipated a deepening nuclear crisis.

Just two weeks ago, the administration’s special envoy for disarmament talks with North Korea, Stephen Bosworth, said during a visit to Asian capitals that “everyone is feeling relatively relaxed about where we are at this point in the process.” If so, they are no longer.

North Korea conducted its first atomic test in 2006 and is thought to have enough plutonium to make at least a half-dozen nuclear bombs. It also is developing long-range ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, in defiance of U.N. actions.

One of the first estimates of the size of Monday’s nuclear explosion came from the Russian defense ministry, which put the yield at between 10 and 20 kilotons — comparable to the U.S. bombs that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan in August 1945. But a senior U.S. administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said it appeared the explosive yield was much smaller, perhaps a few kilotons. The official said more technical analysis would be done in coming days.

The administration official also disclosed that North Korea notified the State Department less than one hour before the explosion that it intended to conduct a nuclear test at an unspecified time. The U.S. then notified China, Russia, Japan and South Korea, the official said.

The United States could still try to resuscitate so-called six-party talks with the North as well as work with other members of the United Nations. North Korea has vowed not to resume participation in the six-party talks with the U.S., Japan, South Korea, China and Russia.

The Bush administration worked hard to get China, in particular, to press the North Koreans to denuclearize, and it seems likely that Obama will push equally hard with Beijing, which sided with the North Koreans against U.S. and United Nations forces during the 1950-53 Korean War. In recent years the Chinese have openly criticized the North Koreans for the nuclear arms program.

Two of the main worries about North Korea are left unsaid: Would it use a nuclear bomb to attack a neighbor or the United States? And might it continue an established pattern of selling nuclear wherewithal and missiles to foreign buyers?

Graham Allison, an assistant secretary of defense in the Clinton administration and now director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University, said Monday that the international community regularly underestimates North Korean leader Kim Jong Il’s willingness to do the unexpected.

“Could this guy believe he could sell a nuclear bomb to Osama bin Laden?”

Allison asked in a phone interview. “Why not?”

EDITOR’S NOTE — Robert Burns has covered national security affairs for The Associated Press since 1990.”

N. Korea Warns of ‘Merciless Punishment’: Posted on AOL News-By HYUNG-JIN KIM, AP-On May 27, 2009:

http://news.aol.com/article/north-korea-test-fires-2-more-missiles/434846

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“SEOUL, South Korea (May 27) – North Korea launched a tirade Wednesday against world powers threatening to punish it for conducting its second nuclear test, saying it is not afraid of sanctions and calling South Korea’s decision to join an operation to prevent the spread of weapons a declaration of war.

The North also has reportedly restarted its weapons-grade nuclear plant. It staged a rally in its capital, Pyongyang, on Tuesday to celebrate the test.

The isolated communist regime said through its official news agency that it would respond with military action if South Korea tries to stop or search any of its ships as part of the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative.

“Those who provoke (North Korea) once will not be able to escape its unimaginable and merciless punishment,” the North’s official news agency said.

South Korea decided to join the anti-proliferation initiative on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s mass-circulation Chosun Ilbo newspaper reported Wednesday that U.S. spy satellites detected signs of steam at the North’s Yongbyon nuclear complex, an indication that it may have started reprocessing nuclear fuel.

The report, which could not be confirmed, quoted an unidentified government official. South Korea’s Yonhap news agency also had a similar report.

The move would be a major setback for efforts aimed at getting North Korea to disarm.

North Korea had stopped reprocessing fuel rods as part of an international deal. In 2007, it agreed to disable the Yongbyon reactor in exchange for aid and demolished a cooling tower at the complex.

The North has about 8,000 spent fuel rods which, if reprocessed, could allow it to harvest 13 to 18 pounds (six to eight kilograms) of plutonium — enough to make at least one nuclear bomb, experts said. North Korea is believed to have enough plutonium for at least a half dozen atomic bombs.

Further ratcheting up tensions, North Korea has test-fired five short-range missiles over the past two days, South Korean officials confirmed.

North Korea suggested that more missile tests could be planned, telling ships to stay away from waters off its west coast through Wednesday, according to South Korea’s coast guard.

The North’s moves have brought a wave of international reproach.

In New York, the U.N. Security Council is discussing a resolution that could include new sanctions.

Ambassadors from the five permanent veto-wielding council members — the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France — as well as Japan and South Korea are expected to meet again soon to work out the details.

Council members, after condemning the test on Monday, said they would follow up with a new legally binding resolution.

China and Russia, both allies of North Korea, slammed it for going ahead with the blast.

Moscow’s U.N. ambassador, Vitaly Churkin, who is also the Security Council president, said the 15-member body would begin work quickly on a new resolution, according to ITAR-Tass.

He declined to say if additional sanctions were discussed.

China also said it “resolutely opposed” the nuclear test. But it was unclear how far it would go in sanctioning its neighbor.

Experts said past sanctions have had poor results because they weren’t fully implemented and because North Korea is already one of the most isolated countries in the world.

Kim Sung-han, an international relations professor at Seoul’s Korea University, said U.N. resolution 1718, adopted after the North’s first nuclear test in 2006, has strong elements but has not been strictly observed.

He said the success of any sanctions would depend on how aggressively China implements them.

“It’s not going too far to say that China holds all keys in sanctions,” he said.

Details of Monday’s nuclear test may take days to confirm.

Russian defense officials said the blast was roughly as strong as the bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II and was stronger than North Korea’s first test in 2006. Other experts said that was probably an overestimate, and put the blast closer in strength to the first test.

North Korea seemed unconcerned by the condemnation.

A large crowd of Pyongyang residents, including senior military and party officials, gathered Tuesday in a stadium to celebrate the nuclear test.

Choe Thae Bok, a high-ranking party official, was quoted by North Korea’s official news agency as saying that the nuclear test “was a grand undertaking” to protect the country against “the U.S. imperialists’ unabated threat to mount a pre-emptive nuclear attack and (put) sanctions and pressure upon it.”

A North Korean newspaper, Minju Joson, said in a commentary Wednesday that Pyongyang does not fear repercussions.

“It is a laughable delusion for the United States to think that it can get us to kneel with sanctions,” it said. “We’ve been living under U.S. sanctions for decades, but have firmly safeguarded our ideology and system while moving our achievements forward.

The U.S. sanctions policy toward North Korea is like striking a rock with a rotten egg.”

North Korea test-fires two missiles: Posted on The Age-By Park Chan-Kyong-On May 26, 2009:

http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/north-korea-testfires-two-missiles-20090526-bkxy.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

North Korea has fired two short-range missiles in a move set to heighten tensions after its latest nuclear weapons test drew global condemnation.

The UN Security Council held an emergency meeting to consider the options after Pyongyang’s test of a nuclear device on Monday, which some estimates said was almost as powerful as the atom bombs that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The Council called the test a “clear violation” of international law and immediately began working on a resolution that could impose new sanctions on the secretive North, which has now tested two nuclear bombs in three years.

“This resolution should include new sanctions in addition to those already adopted because such behaviour should have a cost and a price to pay,” said Jean-Pierre Lacroix, the deputy French ambassador to the United Nations.

Following the UN condemnation, the North launched one ground-to-air missile and one ground-to-ship missile into the sea on Tuesday off its eastern coast near the city of Hamhung, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency reported.

“Intelligence authorities are analysing the motives for the firing,” it quoted a South Korean government source as saying, adding that each missile had a range of 130km.

In April it test-fired a long-range rocket that critics say was in fact a ballistic missile, and on Monday it test-fired three short-range missiles after the nuclear blast.

Russia estimated the force of Monday’s underground nuclear explosion at up to 20 kilotons, far more powerful than the October 2006 test that announced the impoverished communist state had joined the club of world nuclear powers.

The North said the latest test would “contribute to defending the sovereignty of the country and the nation and socialism, and ensuring peace and security on the Korean peninsula and the region.”

North Korea has repeatedly said it needs a deterrent to ward off an attack by the United States, which it believes wants to topple Kim Jong-Il’s regime. Almost six years of disarmament talks have not stopped its nuclear drive.

Some analysts suggested Kim was using the nuclear test to strengthen his hand at home, and so could be even less swayed than usual by more sanctions or international criticism.

The 67-year-old was widely reported to have suffered a stroke last August, prompting speculation overseas about the succession. The North’s position has noticeably hardened since then.

“This is part of Kim shoring up support for his regime among the inner circle and the public,” Peter Beck, a Korea expert at the American University in Washington, told AFP.

“The internal domestic dynamic is taking precedence over external factors.”

Even China, a permanent member of the Security Council and the North’s sole main ally, was strongly critical of the latest test – which North Korea had pledged to carry out because of previous censure from the Council.

“Disregarding the common objections of the international community, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has again tested a nuclear device,” China’s foreign ministry said in a statement.

“The Chinese government expresses its resolute opposition to this,” it said.

US President Barack Obama, whose initial overtures to the North since taking office in January have been met with official hostility from Pyongyang, condemned what he called its “reckless” atomic test.

“North Korea’s nuclear ballistic missile programs pose a great threat to the peace and security of the world,” he said.

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said his government was “registering Australia’s deep concern at the North Korean test and registering further ways that we can work together to thwart North Korea’s future nuclear ambitions”.

“North Korea’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile program are an increasing threat to regional security, to Australia’s national security and to the wider international community,” he said.

“We must work with our friends around the region on this threat now, to ensure that this emerging threat is contained in the future.”

The North on Tuesday reiterated complaints that Obama was no better than his predecessor.

“The present US administration is talking about what it called a ‘change’ and ‘bilateral dialogue’ but it is, in actuality, pursuing the same reckless policy as followed by the former Bush administration to stifle the DPRK (North Korea) by force of arms,” said the ruling party newspaper Rodong Sinmun.

Foreign ministers from Asia and Europe meeting in Hanoi were set to condemn the nuclear test as “a clear violation” of six-party agreements and UN resolutions, according to a draft text.

South Korea announced it was joining the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative, an international effort to curb trade in weapons of mass destruction that involves some 90 nations and includes military exercises.

North Korea had previously said that it would see the South’s participation as a declaration of war.”

Could Iran Outsource an A-Bomb Test to N. Korea?: Blog Posted on China Confidential-By Confidential Reporter-On May 26, 2009:

http://chinaconfidential.blogspot.com/2009/05/could-iran-outsource-a-bomb-test-to-n.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

‘Following North Korea’s test-firing of two more short-range missiles off its east coast on Tuesday, a reader asks if there is any truth to the rumor that North Korea conducted its second nuclear test for Iran–meaning, was the bomb made in Iran?

The answer, as far as we can tell, is no.

But the idea is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Unless it is stopped, Islamist Iran could one day outsource a nuclear weapon test to its Stalinist/Kimist ally.

Iran could also order up an atomic bomb and drop-ship it–literally–to the United States, using North Korea as a manufacturer and fulfillment center. Iran could arrange and pay for delivery of the weapon–to a U.S. coastal city by an Iranian or North Korean-controlled cargo ship flying a so-called flag of convenience.

Thousands of civilian vessels approach U.S. coastal waters daily; millions of containers are delivered annually; warhead-tipped missiles could be fired from such ships, using already tested, containerized launch systems; bombs could be smuggled into busy ports for detonation.

A relative handful of containers are inspected; and there is no defense against sea-based ballistic missile attacks, aimed at the cities or high above the country in an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack designed to wipe out the electric power grid and most electronics and communication systems.

In a move that indicates growing concern over the North Korean-Iranian nuclear threat, South Korea said Tuesday that it would join a U.S.-led initiative to intercept ships suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction.

China Confidential is the only media outlet to have accurately predicted both North Korean nuclear tests, including predicting the exact test dates. Using open source intelligence and an international network of volunteer stringers and analysts, China Confidential has consistently out-reported the mainstream media on the twin threats to world peace–nuclear-arming North Korea and nuclear-armed Iran.

POSTSCRIPT: Israeli defense experts are increasingly concerned about a possible EMP attack on the Jewish State. A knockout blow to electronic and communication systems could paralyze the country and allow for an all-out assault by Hezbollah, Hamas, and Syria with coordinated uprisings by radicalized Israeli Arabs.

In such a scenario, Iran could be responsible for the sneak attack–delivered by a foreign-flagged vessel–that could theoretically pave the way for the conquest of Israel while affording Iran a measure of plausible deniability.”

Note: These articles relate to and are pertinent to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

This blog contains articles from the Russian newspaper Pravda and the Russian’s view of what has been happening in America. Even the Russians can see the pathology! If these articles don’t put chills down your spine, then it confirms what the Russians are saying about Americans being a passive, hapless sheeple-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america/

Pros & Con’s of The Bush Presidency Foreign Policy:

This blog contains an article that seems to give us the Pros and Cons of the Bush Presidency, as it relates to the Middle East Policy. Although, I agree that there were some Cons, like every other Presidency, I believe that the number one Pro was that we were never attacked here at home after the 9/11 tragedy, which says something about the “war on terror” policy-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/pros-con’s-of-the-bush-presidency-foreign-policy/

A 9/10 Security Mindset:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/a-910-security-mindset/

33 Minutes-Protecting America During New Missile Age:

This blog contains an eye-opening 96 page report, along with a 7-minute sneak peak trailer, reveal that a ballistic missile fired at the US could reach its target in thirty-three (33) minutes or lessYou Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/33-minutes-protecting-america-during-new-missile-age/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question:  Could it be true that there is a bill that was approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate for passage, that would prohibit federal employees of the executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence-legislation that at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama’s elusive birth certificate from release?

The following articles and/or blogs reveal that there is such a bill awaiting passage by the Senate-You Decide:

NWO-The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act

The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act?Posted on Natural Born Conservative III-By LARRY WALKER–On May 25, 2009:

What an OUTRAGE THIS IS……..

WASHINGTON – A bill approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate would prohibit federal employees of the executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence – legislation at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama’s elusive birth certificate from release.

“In any case, this bill puts the lie to this administration and this Congress being the most ethical and transparent in American history,” Farah said. “They’re very open when it comes to the secrets of previous administrations, but when it comes to their own work, it is shrouded in secrecy. Even the president’s birth certificate and student records are well-guarded state secrets.”

The Bill is H.R. 1507 [formerly H.R. 985], currently in Senate Judiciary Committee http://bit.ly/Q5nSY #ref http://tinyurl.com/yuve9j

Sovereignty Alliance has issued a “red alert” about the bill it calls “stealth legislation … to protect Obama from providing his birth certificate.”

Update:

The Current Bill is H.R. 1507: Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2009. You can read it at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1507

Source Link:

http://naturalbornconservative.blogspot.com/2009/05/obama-birth-certificate-protection-act.html

NWO-HR 985- The Obama birth certificate protection act

HR 985: The Obama birth certificate protection act?-Posted on Soda Head-On May 25, 2009:

Posted: May 24, 2009

9:12 pm Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Barack Obama, the man elected president

WASHINGTON – A bill approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate would prohibit federal employees of the executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence – legislation at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama’s elusive birth certificate from release.

The legislation, HR 985, resides in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Sovereignty Alliance has issued a “red alert” about the bill it calls “stealth legislation … to protect Obama from providing his birth certificate.”

“It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if this were one of the intended consequences of this legislation,” said Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, who last week initiated a national billboard campaign to bring attention to the issue of Obama’s missing birth certificate and what it might say about his claim to be a “natural born citizen,” a status necessary to serving in the White House.

“In any case, this bill puts the lie to this administration and this Congress being the most ethical and transparent in American history,” Farah said. “They’re very open when it comes to the secrets of previous administrations, but when it comes to their own work, it is shrouded in secrecy. Even the president’s birth certificate and student records are well-guarded state secrets.”

Farah launched a petition campaign several months ago that has collected nearly 400,000 names of Americans demanding answers as to Obama’s eligibility. Last week he called for financial support of a new campaign to erect billboards around the country asking the simple question: “Where’s the birth certificate?”

In just five days, the billboard campaign has been backed by about $45,000 in donations.

Likewise, Farah points out, the nearly 400,000 petitioners represents more people than live in any of the following U.S. cities:

St. Louis, Missouri

Tampa, Florida

Anaheim, California

Cincinnati, Ohio

Toledo, Ohio

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

New Orleans, Louisiana

Newark, New Jersey

Birmingham, Alabama

Madison, Wisconsin

Orlando, Florida

Reno, Nevada

Richmond, Virginia

Des Moines, Iowa

Little Rock, Arkansas

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Salt Lake City, Utah

Providence, Rhode Island

Kansas City, Kansas

Hartford, Connecticut

Springfield, Illinois

Berkeley, California

Green Bay, Wisconsin

Both efforts are part of what Farah calls an independent “truth and transparency campaign.”

The money is being used to erect billboards around the country that ask a simple question: “Where’s the birth certificate?”

The first such sign to be posted under the 5-day-old campaign, a digital, electronic one, is up and online on Highway 165 in Ball, La. – the result of a donation by the owner. In addition, based on the heavy volume of financial donations in the first two days of the campaign, WND was able to commit to leasing two more standard billboards – one in Los Angeles and the other in Pennsylvania. It will take several weeks to get those billboards up because of the vinyl printing and shipping involved.

Birth certificate question being raised in Ball, La.

The “Certification of Live Birth” posted online and widely touted as “Obama’s birth certificate” does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same “short-form” document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true “long-form” birth certificate – which includes information like the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

“I know now, because of the sensational response to this idea from WND viewers, that this national campaign is going to be big and long-lasting,” said Farah. “I want to thank all of those who have pitched in and contributed – with either cash donations or, in some cases, space donations. But the need for money continues.”

While the campaign is off to a great start, many viewers have asked why Obama’s name is not included in the billboard. Farah said the matter was carefully considered.

“There are several reasons we chose the message: ‘Where’s the birth certificate?’” he explained. “There is only one birth certificate controversy in this country today – despite the near-total absence of this issue from coverage in the non-WND media. This is a grass-roots issue that resonates around the country, as our own online petition with nearly 400,000 signers suggests. In addition, I like the simplicity of the message. I like the fact that the message will cause some people to ask themselves or others about the meaning of the message. It will stir curiosity. It will create a buzz. I’m assuming when these billboards are springing up all over the country, it might even make some in the news media curious. And there’s one more factor that persuaded me this was the way to go.

“Come 2012, campaign laws will pose restrictions on political advertising mentioning the names of presidential candidates. This one clearly doesn’t. I would like to see the federal government make the case that this is somehow a political ad,” he said.

Farah said the campaign was born of frustration with timid elected officials in Washington, corrupt judges around the country and a news media that show a stunning lack of curiosity about the most basic facts of Obama’s background – especially how it relates to constitutional eligibility for the highest office in the land.

“As Obama transforms this country from self-governing constitutional republic to one governed by a central ruling elite, the simple fact remains that no controlling legal authority has established that he is indeed a ‘natural born citizen’ as the Constitution requires,” Farah said. “Obama’s promises of transparency have become a bad joke as he continues to hide simple, innocuous documents like his birth certificate and his student records.”

The idea behind the billboard campaign is to make sure Obama cannot avoid this question any longer. He must be asked to produce it at every turn, Farah says. Billboard space is currently being hunted in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Sacramento, San Francisco, New York-New Jersey, Des Moines, Seattle and other metro areas.

Farah said another early target for the campaign would be billboards in Honolulu – allegedly Obama’s birthplace.

“Is it unusual for a news agency to launch such a campaign?” asks Farah. “Yes it is. But we live in very unusual times. The founding fathers built special protections into the First Amendment for the free press. The reason they did that is because they understood a vibrant ‘Fourth Estate’ was necessary as an independent watchdog on government. It is in that tradition that WND assumes this role – since nobody else in the press will do it.”

WND previously launched a petition campaign that has collected more than 370,000 names demanding Obama’s eligibility be verified and demonstrated publicly. That campaign continues. That list has been shared with members of the Electoral College and the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

“I wish such a campaign were not absolutely necessary,” said Farah. “I wish there were checks and balances in our political and electoral systems to ensure that constitutional eligibility of presidential candidates was established before politicians could assume the highest office in the land. I wish my colleagues in the news media believed the Constitution really means what it says and pressed this issue as hard as we have pressed it at WND. I wish radio talk-show hosts were bold enough to ask this question. But wishing is not enough. It’s time to raise the visibility of this issue vital to the rule of law in America. I ask everyone to pitch in and help WND make a simple yet profound statement: The Constitution still matters.”

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId;=9…

Source Link:

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/the-obama-birth-certificate-protection-act/blog-81495/?link=ibaf&q=HR+985%3A+The+Obama+birth+certificate+protection+act

NWO-Obama is the Manifestation of a Multi-Generational Soviet Plot to Destroy America

Obama is the Manifestation of a Multi-Generational Soviet Plot to Destroy America!Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 2, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-is-the-manifestati..

Obama-Transparency-Barack Obama’s best-kept secret

The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act!

http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_The-Obama-birth-certificate-protection-act/BLOG/288747/78592.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this blog:

“WASHINGTON – A bill approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate would prohibit federal employees of the executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence—legislation at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama’s elusive birth certificate from release.

The legislation, HR985, resides in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Sovereignty Alliance has issued a “red alert” about the bill it calls “stealth legislation … to protect Obama from providing his birth certificate.”

“It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if this were one of the intended consequences of this legislation,” said Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, who last week initiated a national billboard campaign to bring attention to the issue of Obama’s missing birth certificate and what it might say about his claim to be a “natural born citizen,” a status necessary to serving in the White House.

“In any case, this bill puts the lie to this administration and this Congress being the most ethical and transparent in American history,” Farah said.

“They’re very open when it comes to the secrets of previous administrations, but when it comes to their own work, it is shrouded in secrecy. Even the president’s birth certificate and student records are well-guarded state secrets.”

More:

http://www.wnd.com/index….

NWO-BARACK OBAMA'S PRIVACY RIGHTS

BARACK OBAMA’S ‘PRIVACY RIGHTS’: ‘Exclusive: Joseph Farah uses Hawaii law to argue for release of O’s birth certificate’!Posted on WND.com-By JOSEPH FARAH-On March 16, 2011:

To hear it told from the state of Hawaii and Barack Obama supporters, the reason we can’t see his birth certificate, and judge for ourselves whether or not he is constitutionally eligible to serve as president, is a matter of state laws written to protect personal privacy rights.

This raises a number of serious questions the rest of the press and most elected officials in Washington seem to want to avoid:

  • Has a Hawaiian birth certificate become a source of national controversy?
  • Does that birth certificate belong to the most visible and well-known public figure in the nation?
  • Does that birth certificate form the basis for any serious determination as to that public figure’s constitutional eligibility to serve in the highest public office in the land?
  • Has the state of Hawaii made official public representations about the nature of that birth certificate? On the edge of a constitutional crisis … learn the facts in WND’s comprehensive “Obama Eligibility Primer”
  • Has the well-known public figure made representations about that birth certificate?
  • Has the well-know public figure already released publicly other documents purporting to be official Hawaii birth documents?
  • Does Hawaii routinely release birth announcements publicly to the press and public?
  • Did Hawaii release a birth announcement publicly regarding this particular birth in 1961?
  • Was the Hawaii privacy law that prevents anyone without a direct or tangible interest in seeing a particular birth certificate created to prevent misuse or abuse of a person’s personal information?
  • Since Barack Obama has released his name, his alleged parents’ names, his date of birth, his address and his ethnicity in a short form certificate to bolster his campaign for the presidency, did he not establish with said release a tangible public interest in the long-form certificate?
  • Since a particular hospital in Hawaii has, at various times, claimed for the purposes of fundraising and public relations concerns that it was the birthplace of Barack Obama, how can the hospital continue to hide behind privacy laws the information to support that claim?
  • What possible privacy matters could be breached with the release of the long-form certificate that have not already been breached by the hospital, state officials and the No. 1 public figure himself?

Hawaii’s state constitution contains a section about personal privacy. It states that privacy of the individual shall not be infringed “without the showing of a compelling state interest.”

Recently, Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie announced his intention to seek that document. He asked the attorney general of the state to research the matter. Yet, unnamed officials in Hawaii have determined that, for some reason, Barack Obama’s birth certificate should remain top secret because of the Uniform Information Practices Act.

Let’s examine what that act actually covers and doesn’t cover:

  • medical history, condition, and treatment;
  • criminal law investigation, except where disclosure is necessary to prosecute or continue the investigation;
  • eligibility for social services or welfare benefits;
  • public employment personnel file type information;
  • non-governmental employment history except where information qualifies a government employee for his or her position;
  • financial information;
  • professional and vocational licensee qualifications except;
  • personal recommendations or evaluations;
  • Social security numbers.

The office administering these policies has also determined that the individual has a significant privacy interest in his or her home contact information, date of birth and ethnicity.

Yet, under these guidelines, Hawaii has an obligation to release the long-form birth certificate because all of the relevant privacy matters have already been disclosed with the public release of the short-form certificate.

What possible privacy breaches could occur by releasing the long-form birth certificate – unless, of course, that information is actually different from what has been provided by Obama himself, the hospital claiming his birth, state officials and the newspaper announcements revealing his birth date, parentage and address?

In other words, Hawaii officials either can’t read their own laws, or they are actively involved in an extensive and elaborate cover-up of a matter of great public interest, national security and constitutional integrity – all the while claiming falsely their hands are tied by their own privacy laws.

Source Link:

http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/275417/#udp7vdFisXHsq2Ta.99

Obama-Transparency-Barack Obama’s best-kept secret

FOIA OBAMA!Posted on WND.com-By Ken Jaeger-On December 25, 2012:

If newspapers can get private citizens’ names, addresses, etc. under the Freedom of Information Act, then why can we not get the president’s authentic long-form birth certificate and college records?

Source Link:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/foia-obama/#jrkbmSw1mp7KltA7.99

Note:  Something interesting happens when you attempt to go to the above WND web site-it is being blocked as “Invalid page access attempt”-wonder why-You Decide.

Link to Bill:

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/webreturn/?url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.985:

Note:  The following articles and/or blogs and video relate to this extremely disturbing issue-You Decide:

NWO-Most transparent White House ever rewrote the FOIA to suppress politically sensitive docs

Most transparent’ White House ever rewrote the FOIA to suppress politically sensitive docs!-Posted on Washington Examiner-By MARK TAPSCOTT-On March 18, 2014:

It’s Sunshine Week, so perhaps some enterprising White House reporter will ask press secretary Jay Carney why President Obama rewrote the Freedom of Information Act without telling the rest of America.

The rewrite came in an April 15, 2009, memo from then-White House Counsel Greg Craig instructing the executive branch to let White House officials review any documents sought by FOIA requestors that involved “White House equities.”

That phrase is nowhere to be found in the FOIA, yet the Obama White House effectively amended the law to create a new exception to justify keeping public documents locked away from the public.

A serious breach

The Greg memo is described in detail in a new study made public today by Cause of Action, a Washington-based nonprofit watchdog group that monitors government transparency and accountability.

How serious an attack on the public’s right to know is the Obama administration’s invention of the “White House equities” exception?

“FOIA is designed to inform the public on government behavior; White House equities allow the government to withhold information from the media, and therefore the public, by having media requests forwarded for review. This not only politicizes federal agencies, it impairs fundamental First Amendment liberties,” Cause of Action explains in its report.

Equities are everything

The equities exception is breathtaking in its breadth. As the Greg memo put it, any document request is covered, including “congressional committee requests, GAO requests, judicial subpoenas and FOIA requests.”

And it doesn’t matter what format the documents happen to be in because, according to Greg, the equities exception “applies to all documents and records, whether in oral, paper, or electronic form, that relate to communications to and from the White House, including preparations for such communications.”

Forget making FOIA deadlines

The FOIA requires federal agencies to respond within 20 days of receiving a request, but the White House equities exception can make it impossible for an agency to meet that deadline.

In one case cited by Cause of Action, the response to a request from a Los Angeles Times reporter to the Department of the Interior for “communications between the White House and high-ranking Interior officials on various politically sensitive topics” was delayed at least two years by the equities review.

“Cause of Action is still waiting for documents from 16 federal agencies, with the Department of Treasury having the longest pending request of 202 business days.

“The Department of Energy is a close second at 169 business days. The requests to the Department of Defense and Department of Health and Human Services have been pending for 138 business days,” the report said.

So much for “the most transparent administration in history.”

Source Link:

http://washingtonexaminer.com/most-transparent-white-house-ever-rewrote-the-foia-to-suppress-politically-sensitive-docs/article/2545824#

NWO-Obama FOIA Family Fraud – It’s A Breeze

Obama FOIA Family Fraud – It’s A Breeze!-Posted on Terrible Truth-By Martha Trowbridge-On March 18, 2014:

http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/obama-foia-family-fraud-its-a-breeze/

Obama-Lord Monckton On Obama Eligibility

Video: Lord Monckton Investigates Obama’s Forged Birth Certificate!Posted on Western Journalism-By DANIEL NOE-On June 9, 2012:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/lord-monckton-investigates-obamas-forged-birth-certificate/

Note:  These recent blogs are pertinent and relate to this issue-You Decide:

Supreme Court-Sotomayor

Is Being An Empathetic Liberal Minority The New Prerequisite for Being a Supreme Court Justice?

This blog contains articles that lay out Sonia Sotomayor’s controversial background experiences as a Private Practice Attorney and an Appeals Court Judge, which reveals that she:

  • does not believe that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to individuals.
  • believes that judges make policy;
  • believes that Latinas are better than a white male who hasn’t lived that life (Best case scenario for reverse discrimination law suit?);
  • believes that she can substitute her own policy preferences for what the law really is;
  • believes that international law and policy should be considered in some court decisions; and,
  • has been known to have a temperament on the bench which has been that of a “bully”, who is “abusive” to lawyers. (Guess this meets the empathetic requirement for appointment?)-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/is-being-an-empathetic-liberal-minority-the-new-prerequisite-for-being-a-supreme-court-justice/

Comment:  I believe that the President is attempting to appoint someone with a radical background to the Supreme Court who can assist him in his cause of permanently sealing his elusive “birth certificate and other personal records” from the American Public-why?-You Decide:

President Obama’s Eligibility Status Press Release!

This blog contains a Press Release that I e-mailed to all News Media outlets and are shared with you in hopes that you will do the same, as a means of standing up for and defending our eroding “Constitutional Rights” under this President and his administration, that will ultimately destroy this great country of ours-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/president-obama’s-eligibility-status-press-release/

Letters & E-Mails Requesting President Obama’s Eligibility Status:

This blog contains copies of letters and/or emails that I have sent to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor-US Attorney for the District of Columbia, my US Congressman, US Senator and FBI Albuquerque Field Office and would like to share them with you, as a means of giving you some ideas of what action others could hopefully take to join this urgent, time sensitive and worthy cause, by standing up for and defending those rights given us under our Constitution-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/letters-e-mails-sent-requesting-president-obama’s-eligibility-status/

Note:  My following blogs relate to and/or support the above articles and/or blogs and videos-You Decide:

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery? 

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/why-obama-is-ineligible-–-regardless-of-his-birthplace/

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/hawaii-elections-clerk-obama-birth-not-here/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Obama’s paltry paper trail raises serious questions!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/obamas-paltry-paper-trail-raises-serious-questions/

New investigation into Obama background spells trouble ahead!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/new-investigation-into-obama-background-spells-trouble-ahead/

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/clearing-the-smoke-on-obama’s-eligibility/

Another General Supports LtCol. Lakin!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/another-general-supports-ltcol-lakin/

JAGs Protecting President Obama Have Committed Treason!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/25/jags-protecting-president-obama-have-committed-treason/

Nearly 1/2 of U.S. Citizens Are Now Saying That Obama Is Not A Legitimate President!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/nearly-12-of-u-s-citizens-are-now-saying-that-obama-is-not-a-legitimate-president/

First Time In History That a Member of Congress Has Questioned a Sitting President’s Eligibility!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/first-time-in-history-that-a-member-of-congress-has-questioned-a-sitting-president’s-eligibility/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/cia-columbia-obama-cover-up/

Why did a black preacher from Harlem have a “hit” placed on his life?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/why-has-a-black-preacher-from-harlem-received-a-“hit”-on-his-life/

Key Witness In Obama’s Passport Fraud Case Fatally Shot!

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/19/key_witness_in_obama’s_passport_fraud_case_fatally_shot.thtml

The Real-Deal About Obama, Congressional And Court Silence!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/the-real-deal-about-obama-and-congressionalcourt-silence/

President Obama’s Eligibility Status!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/president-obama’s-eligibility-status/

Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/massive-voter-fraud-again/

Was the Economic Crisis Manufactured?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/was-the-economic-crisis-manufactured/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-trust-the-government/

Where Is America Today?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-obamas-resignation/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america-2/

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/disclaimer/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

 

Read Full Post »

American Eagle-Mine

Question: When did being an empathetic liberal minority become the primary eligibility prerequisite for appointment as a Justice to the Supreme Court, the highest court in our country, over other more critical qualifications (e.g., court work experience requirements, etc.), along with the content of their character and their appropriate interpretation of the U.S. Constitution?

Supreme Court-Sotomayor’s Autobiography Whitewashes Radical College Years

These articles lay out Sonia Sotomayor’s controversial background experiences as a Private Practice Attorney and an Appeals Court Judge, along with revealing that she:

  • does not believe that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to individuals.
  • believes that judges make policy;
  • believes that Latinas are better than a white male who hasn’t lived that life (Best case scenario for reverse discrimination law suit?);
  • believes that she can substitute her own policy preferences for what the law really is;
  • believes that international law and policy should be considered in some court decisions; and,
  • has been known to have a temperament on the bench which has been that of a “bully”, who is “abusive” to lawyers. (Guess this meets the empathetic requirement for appointment?)-You Decide:

Supreme Court-Sotomayor believes 2nd Amendment not for Individuals

Sotomayor Believes 2nd Amendment Not For Individuals!-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On May 26, 2009:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/05/26/sotomayor-believes-2nd-amendment-not-for-individuals/

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“Today President Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court to fill the seat of retiring Justice David Souter. If confirmed, Sotomayor would become the first Hispanic and third woman to serve on the High Court.

Sotomayor is a graduate of Princeton and obtained her law degree from Yale. She served in private practice and as Assistant District Attorney in New York County and was nominated to the Second Circuit federal Court of Appeals by President George H. W. Bush in 1991.

Despite 17 years on the bench, Sotomayor has never directly decided whether a law regulating abortion is constitutional.

In Center for Reproductive Law & Policy v. Bush, she wrote an opinion that upheld the Mexico City Policy prohibiting federal funding of overseas abortions.

Sotomayor does not believe that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to individuals.

While on a panel discussion at Duke Law School, she argued that the “Court of Appeals is where policy is made.” Judge Sotomayor has had 5 decisions reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, 3 of which have been reversed.

She has carried 11 of 44 possible votes during those cases. In Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Chief Justice Roberts stated that her method of reading the statute in question “flies in the face of the statutory language.”

She has written in support of Affirmative Action, upheld the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and in Amandola v. Town of Babylon, she wrote that denying use of a town hall annex for their worship services violated the First Amendment.

She has written a book called “The International Judge,” which suggests that international law and policy should be considered in some court decisions.

Some have described her temperament on the bench as a “bully” and “abusive” to lawyers.”

Newsmax Logo (2)

Sotomayor Video: Judges Make Policy, Latinas Better Than Whites: Posted on NewsMax.Com-By: Kenneth D. Williams-On May 26, 2009:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Sotomayor_statements/2009/05/26/218143.html?s=al&promo_code=8061-1

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama’s pick to become the newest Supreme Court justice, is on the record with some controversial remarks about ‘diversity,’ ‘judicial activism’ and female judges vs. male judges.

For example, the New York Times reported that in 2001, at the annual Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture, Sotomayor had this to say:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

“Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” she said later, regarding non-white, female judges, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.”

Also, there is a 2005 video of Sotomayor, speaking with potential law clerks, saying that a court of appeals is where policy is made. She added: “And I know ok I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law. I know. O.K. I know. I’m not promoting it. I’m not advocating it …”

Regarding Sotomayor’s chances to avoid a filibuster of her nomination, Senator Orrin Hatch told Politico, I’ll tell you one thing, I’m not very happy about judges who will substitute their own policy preferences for what the law really is; who think that they can run the country from the bench when they actually have a limited role. And that role is to interpret the laws made by those who have to stand for reelection.”

Despite Hatch’s misgivings, Democratic Senators Charles E. Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York sent a personal letter to President Barack Obama asking him to appoint a Latino to fill the next vacancy on the United States Supreme Court Back in April.

It’s long overdue that a Latino sit on the United States Supreme Court. Sonia Sotomayor and Ken Salazar are two candidates who would make outstanding justices. They have top-notch legal minds, years of experience, moderate approaches to the law, and would make history by being the first Latino on the court. Senator Schumer said.

“We are fortunate in New York State to have jurists of the caliber and intellect that Judge Sotomayor has exhibited during a lifelong career of service to the bench. As an accomplished jurist, as a woman, and as a Latina, she would bring to the United States Supreme Court a much needed voice. We must be committed to diversity on our nation’s highest bench. These candidates will restore the balance that we so desperately need on the Court, Senator Gillibrand said.”

WND-Joe Kovacs

Sonia Sotomayor ‘La Raza member’-American Bar Association lists Obama choice as part of group: Posted on WND-By Joe Kovacs-On May 27. 2009:

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=99420

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“As President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee comes under heavy fire for allegedly being a “racist,” Judge Sonia Sotomayor is listed as a member of the National Council of La Raza, a group that’s promoted driver’s licenses for illegal aliens, amnesty programs, and no immigration law enforcement by local and state police.

According the American Bar Association, Sotomayor is a member of the NCLR, which bills itself as the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the U.S. Meaning “the Race,” La Raza also has connections to groups that advocate the separation of several southwestern states from the rest of America.

Over the past two days, Sotomayor has been heavily criticized for her racially charged statement: “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” The remark was actually made during a 2001 speech at the University of California’s Berkeley School of Law. The lecture was published the following year in the Berkeley La Raza Law Journal.

Could Mexico retake the southwestern United States? Get the DVD that says the invasion is already happening!

The comment is being zeroed in on by voices from the political right.
”I’m not saying she’s a racist, but the statement sure is,” columnist Ann Coulter said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“Imagine a judicial nominee said ‘my experience as a white man makes me better than a latina woman,'” blogged former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.

“Wouldn’t they have to withdraw? New racism is no better than old racism. A white man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw.”

Radio’s Rush Limbaugh noted, “And the libs of course say that minorities cannot be racists because they don’t have the power to implement their racism. Well, those days are gone because reverse racists certainly do have the power to implement their power. Obama is the greatest living example of a reverse racist, and now he’s appointed one. …”

But others are suggesting Sotomayor’s racial views will have little impact on her confirmation to the bench.

“She’s gonna get confirmed. Get out of the way of the truck,” political analyst Dick Morris said tonight on Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor.”

Host Bill O’Reilly responded, “The core conservative person … does not understand that the GOP is shrinking and needs to expand.”

The NCLR is applauding the Obama for his selection of Sotomayor.

”Today is a monumental day for Latinos. Finally, we see ourselves represented on the highest court in the land,” said Janet Murguia, NCLR’s president and CEO.

La Raza also praised former President George W. Bush for nominating Alberto Gonzales to succeed John Ashcroft as attorney general.

As WND previously reported, La Raza was condemned in 2007 by former U.S. Rep. Charles Norwood, R-Ga., as a radical “pro-illegal immigration lobbying organization that supports racist groups calling for the secession of the western United States as a Hispanic-only homeland.”

Norwood urged La Raza to renounce its support of the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan – which sees “the Race” as part of an ethnic group that one day will reclaim Aztlan, the mythical birthplace of the Aztecs. In Chicano folklore, Aztlan includes California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and parts of Colorado and Texas.”

Supreme Court-Debate over who Sotomayor is a sensitive one

Debate over who Sotomayor is a sensitive one: Posted on Yahoo! News-By SHARON THEIMER, Associated Press Writer-On May 29, 2009:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/27/sotomayor.problems/index.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“WASHINGTON – There are two sides to Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor: a Latina from a blue-collar family and a wealthy member of America’s power elite.

The White House portrays Sotomayor as a living image of the American dream, though its telling of the rags-to-riches story emphasizes the rags, a more politically appealing narrative, and plays down the riches.

Branding a complex person in a simplistic way can backfire in the highly charged environment surrounding her coming Senate hearing.

Discussions about Sotomayor and her ethnicity, gender and tax bracket carry risks for supporters and detractors. Inartful criticism by Republicans risks offending voters they’d like to win. Democrats, likewise, need to be cautious about how they conduct the debate in a nation uncomfortable talking about matters of race and gender.

On ethnicity, Sotomayor herself has recognized — and contributed to — the dichotomy. She proudly highlights her Puerto Rican roots but hasn’t always liked it when others have. She once took issue with a prospective employer who singled her out as a Latina with questions she viewed as offensive yet has shown a keen ethnic consciousness herself.

In a California speech in 2002 now under renewed scrutiny, she remarked that, on a court, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

In that same speech, “A Latina Judge’s Voice,” Sotomayor drew attention to cultural differences between Mexican-Americans and Puerto Rican-Americans, and she narrowed her ethnicity beyond American, Hispanic and Puerto Rican to “Newyorkrican.”

“For those of you on the West Coast who do not know what that term means: I am a born and bred New Yorker of Puerto Rican-born parents who came to the states during World War II,” she explained.

Yet years ago, during a recruiting dinner in law school at Yale, Sotomayor objected when a law firm partner asked whether she would have been admitted to the school if she weren’t Puerto Rican, and whether law firms did a disservice by hiring minority students the firms know are unqualified and will ultimately be fired.

Afterward, Sotomayor confronted the partner about the questions, rejected his insistence that he meant no harm and turned down his invitation for further job interviews. She filed a discrimination complaint against the firm with the university, which could have barred the firm from recruiting on campus. She won a formal apology from the firm.

In speeches, Sotomayor has harkened back to her and her brother’s beginnings in a poor Bronx neighborhood, roots that President Barack Obama highlighted in introducing her this week.

“Born in the South Bronx, she was raised in a housing project,” Obama said. “And even as she has accomplished so much in her life, she has never forgotten where she began, never lost touch with the community that supported her.”

Yet Sotomayor did not live her entire childhood in a housing project in the South Bronx — she spent most of her teenage years in a middle-class neighborhood, attending private school and winning scholarships to Princeton and then Yale.

And Sotomayor’s life and lifestyle after law school largely resemble the background of many lawyers who rise to powerful positions in Washington.

She climbed her way up through New York’s Democratic power structure boosted by its ultimate brokers over those years — Gov. Mario Cuomo, Mayor Ed Koch, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan and District Attorney Robert Morgenthau. That’s the access of a partner in a corporate law firm, not a kid from the South Bronx.

She now earns more than $200,000 a year and owns a condominium in Greenwich Village, a neighborhood of million-dollar-plus homes. Her brother, Dr. Juan Sotomayor, is a physician in North Syracuse, N.Y., whose practice doesn’t accept Medicaid or Medicare — programs for the poor and elderly — according to its Web site.

Her ethnic consciousness was apparent in the earliest days of her career, in the New York City prosecutor’s office.

“What I am finding, both statistically and emotionally, is that the worst victims of crimes are not general society — i.e., white folks — but minorities themselves,” she told The New York Times in 1983. “The violence, the sorrow are perpetrated by minorities on minorities.”

The “riches” part of Sotomayor’s rags-to-riches story began when she left her low-paying job in that prosecutor’s office and joined the Pavia & Harcourt law firm. Her clients included Fendi, maker of luxury purses that she was unlikely to have seen as a child in the Bronx.

Still, she kept her hand in the Puerto Rican community — possibly to the point of a conflict of interest.

She served simultaneously on New York’s campaign finance board and the board of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, an advocacy group that took legal action in 1991 to fight what it considered discriminatory redistricting. Sotomayor didn’t recuse herself from a finance board discussion of the redistricting battle, despite the involvement of her own advocacy group.

Also during this time, Sotomayor served on the state board that makes mortgages available to low- and middle-income New Yorkers. She missed nearly a third of the board’s meetings during three of those years but apparently still left a mark.Cuomo said Sotomayor’s respect for the law, her “life story” and her integrity were deciding factors in his decision to name her to the agency.

And when she left in 1992, the agency’s board adopted a resolution praising her for defending “the rights and needs of the disadvantaged to attain, maintain, and secure affordable housing appropriate to their need.” It went on: “Ms. Sotomayor also served as the conscience of the Board concerning the negative effects of gentrification which can harm communities and create hopelessness and homelessness if individuals and families are displaced.”

Republicans are scrutinizing her full record and background, but carefully. The White House warned as much earlier this week.

“It is probably important for anybody involved in this debate to be exceedingly careful with the way in which they’ve decided to describe different aspects of this impending confirmation,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

With Hispanics a growing voting bloc, and ethnic sensitivities high, few are willing to be as blunt as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who said of her comment that a Latina woman would rule more wisely than a white man: “New racism is no better than old racism.”

Associated Press writers Cal Woodward in Washington, Sara Kugler in New York and Jessica M. Pasko in Albany, N.Y., contributed to this report.”

Supreme Court-GOP divided over tone of Sotomayor debate

GOP divided over tone of Sotomayor debate: Posted on Yahoo! News-By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer- On May 30, 2009:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/31016812/#.UQxc6Ry9JI8

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“WASHINGTON – Republicans are divided over how aggressively to go after federal judge Sonia Sotomayor, a family feud about the tone of the coming debate over confirming the Supreme Court’s first Hispanic.

A growing chorus of GOP lawmakers and conservative strategists are voicing concern over the strident rhetoric some prominent Republicans have used to describe Sotomayor, and some are denouncing right-wing groups for swiftly launching negative advertisements against her.

The spat reflects a vexing question facing the GOP as it confronts President Barack Obama’s first high court nominee: They can’t defeat Sotomayor or block a final vote to seat her on the court, so what should they do instead?

The answer, according to high-profile Republicans like radio host Rush Limbaugh and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia is to harshly criticize Sotomayor. They both branded the federal judge — the daughter of Puerto Rican parents who was born and raised in New York — a “racist” this week for past remarks about how her ethnicity affected her judging. On Friday, Limbaugh likened picking Sotomayor to nominating former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke for the job.

But other leading Republicans, cognizant of the political risks for their party of opposing the first Hispanic woman to be named to the court, are struggling to change the terms of the debate. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, the head of his party’s Senate campaign committee, sharply criticized Limbaugh and Gingrich for their words.

“I think it’s terrible. This is not the kind of tone that any of us want to set when it comes to performing our constitutional responsibilities of advise and consent,” Cornyn told NPR. “Neither one of these men are elected Republican officials. I just don’t think it’s appropriate. I certainly don’t endorse it. I think it’s wrong.”

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, GOP strategist Peggy Noonan urged her party to “play grown-up,” and dismissed as “idiots” conservatives who were out to attack or brand Sotomayor.

The criticism comes as some conservatives are quietly expressing dismay at the tactics of outside interest groups that are engaged in an intense public-relations offensive against Sotomayor that includes a daily drumbeat of negative statements about her.

A leading organization on the right, the Judicial Confirmation Network, launched an advertising campaign the day Obama named Sotomayor that bashes her record and concludes that “America deserves better.”

“These things just taint the debate because it causes (people) to become callous toward our message. It becomes a ‘cry wolf’ situation,” said Manuel Miranda, chairman of the Third Branch Conference, a conservative group, and a former senior Senate GOP aide. “They’re just out to bash the nominee. This isn’t about bashing the nominee; it’s about engaging on issues.”

Miranda said he is concerned that Senate leaders — knowing that they don’t have the votes to beat Sotomayor and worried about the political consequences of a prolonged effort to do so — will pass up the opportunity to have a drawn-out debate about her record and the two parties’ dueling philosophies about the role of a judge.

“These fissures are very real, and they’re not settled,” Miranda said. “I am afraid that (Senate Republicans) will miss an opportunity.”

GOP leaders are pushing back against that notion. They circulated a document late Friday titled“It’s Going To Take Time,” filled with quotes from senior Democrats who said following the selections of the last two Supreme Court justices to be confirmed, GOP nominees John Roberts and Samuel Alito, that the Senate should take its time considering the nominations.

Republicans face competing pressures in the debate over Sotomayor and the Supreme Court. Opposing her nomination is important to their core supporters, comprised in large part of social conservatives who regard the courts as a key battleground. But the party also is struggling to reach beyond that base and draw more diversity — a goal that could be frustrated with a bitterly partisan fight, especially given Sotomayor’s background.

Gary Marx, the executive director of the Judicial Confirmation Network, said the divisions were more about style and tone than substance. He said conservatives agree that Sotomayor is a“judicial activist” — someone who puts her own views above the law — regardless of how they express themselves.

“Our ads are focused on highlighting her published writing and her own words, making sure those are raised because we feel they speak to the issue of judicial activism,” Marx said. “We can have a healthy debate when we focus on her own writings, her published writings and spoken words.”

Sotomayor’s nomination has caused some angst on the left as well, although Democrats have remained united in public in support of her selection. Still, pro-abortion rights groups are withholding their endorsements until they can learn more about her stance on Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established a woman’s right to end a pregnancy.

The White House fielded calls this week from some concerned groups. Few of the organizations have taken much solace from Sotomayor’s past rulings — which have not touched on the issues underlying Roe — or from the White House’s claim that neither Obama nor any other official ascertained her views on it.”

Supreme Court-Sotomayor’s Autobiography Whitewashes Radical College Years

Sotomayor’s Autobiography Whitewashes Radical College Years!-Posted on Western Journalism-By B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE-On February 1, 2013:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/sotomayors-autobiography-whitewashes-radical-college-years/

These are pertinent excerpts from this article and/or blog post:

“People in general – and leftists specifically – have a tendency to view their own past achievements through rose-colored glasses, and many go as far as to completely rewrite history.

Bill Clinton’s autobiography all but ignored the Monica Lewinsky scandal that triggered the downfall of a morally bankrupt president. Al Gore, in addition to his steady stream of lies concerning the environment, infamously took credit for the creation of the Internet.

In the continuous orgy of self-congratulation that is American politics, an autobiography might be the only place to find a more sickening whitewash of history than accounts from sycophants in the media.

Such is the case with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s recently released tome.

Instead of the familiar “tell-all” book, Sotomayor apparently wrote a “tell-all-she-wants-us-to-know” book leaving out key experiences during her college years.

To be clear, she wrote in great lengths about her time at Princeton University; but her association with openly racist organizations and other left-wing fringe movements are conveniently absent.

She does describe her involvement in groups such as Puerto Rican organization Accion Puertorriquena and the civil rights association the Third World Center.

What the book fails to reveal, however, are the radical policies and ideologies espoused by members of those two organizations.

As co-chair of Accion Puertorriquena, Sotomayor pushed relentlessly for racial quotas in her quest for affirmative action.

Accusing Princeton of “an attempt … to relegate an important cultural sector of the population to oblivion,” she stoked backlash from campus newspaper “The Daily Princetonian”‘s editorial staff.

“Affirmative action should not mean positive efforts to reverse a historical pattern of minority under-representation at the expense of traditional standards of excellence,” the paper published at the time. [Emphasis in original.]

Her pro-minority bias seemed to morph into an anti-white bias with her involvement in the Third World Center at Princeton.

In addition to a radical agenda put forth in the group’s founding documents, Sotomayor added her own leftist fingerprint by inviting speakers such as Manuel Maldonado-Denis, who reported that the “only solution” to the U.S. “exploiting” Puerto Rico is “through the establishment of national liberation and the establishment of socialism.”

If this was her inspiration back then, is there any wonder Barack Obama chose her to sit on the highest court in the land – possessing the power to change public policy without worrying about re-election?

Perhaps most relevant to her current position of power, Sotomayor showed partiality toward minorities as a student judge in college.

After inappropriately disparaging eight students who broke into the dorm room of two gay individuals in a letter to the Daily Princetonian, Sotomayor heard the case and demanded those involved be expelled, sources familiar with the incident report.

In the end, the eight students were given two years of probation and were stigmatized with a permanent mark on their records.

Even the victims of the break-in said at the time the punishment was too severe.

While I certainly want a Supreme Court sensitive to injustice, Sotomayor’s past seems to indicate she is receptive to only the suffering of her favorite minority groups.”

American Eagle-Mine

Note:  This is an article by Mychal Massie, chairman of the Project 21 black leadership network, who is urging senators to take a very close look at her record before commenting on her fitness for the job, which I believe is pertinent and relates to this issue-You Decide:

Black Leader Urges Senate Scrutiny for Sotomayor Supreme Court Nomination: “No Rubber Stamp for Controversial Nominee”: Press Release Posted on The National Center For Public Policy Research-Posted By Mychal Massie-On May 26, 2009:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PR-Sotomayor_052609.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

Washington, D.C. – With President Obama’s nomination of U.S. Circuit Court judge Sonia Sotomayor to the vacancy being created by U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter’s impending retirement, Mychal Massie, chairman of the Project 21 black leadership network, is urging senators to take a very close look at her record before commenting on her fitness for the job.

“Of all the possible nominees suggested over the past few weeks, it appears Obama selected the most radical one,” said Massie.

“The U.S. Senate has a duty to scrutinize Judge Sotomayor’s record to ensure she has the demeanor and aptitude to be elevated to such a solemn post.”

Massie continued: “During the Bush Administration, it was common for liberal senators to demand a consensus nominee with broad political appeal.  By selecting an avowed liberal in Sotomayor, it would appear Obama is not following the stipulation he and his former colleagues sought to impose upon his predecessor.  This should open up the nomination to the scrutiny it justly deserves.”

The Sotomayor nomination, Massie notes, is the perfect catalyst to begin a national debate on the appropriateness of “judicial activism” – when judges essentially cut lawmakers out of the legislative process and try to rule from the bench.

For example, in a 2001 speech at the University of California at Berkeley School of Law, Sotomayor said it was appropriate for a judge such as herself to use her “experiences as women and people of color” to “affect our decisions.”

In 2005, she told a crowd at the Duke University Law School that the “Court of Appeals is where policy is made” – rather than by lawmakers beholden to voters.

Massie commented: “Considering Justice Souter’s record, Sotomayor will not change the balance of the Supreme Court.  But she will likely dramatically alter the temperament of the Court and the way in which it operates.  Senators must keep this in mind as they take on the very solemn process of vetting her fitness.”

Project 21, a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research, has been a leading voice of the African-American community since 1992.  For more information, contact David Almasi at (202) 543-4110 x11 or Project21@nationalcenter.org, or visit Project 21’s website at:  http://www.project21.org/P21Index.html

For Release: May 26, 2009 Contact: David Almasi at (202) 543-4110 x11 or 
or dalmasi@nationalcenter.org

American Eagle-Mine

Note: This magazine article reveals President Obama’s planned attacked on the courts, which I believe is pertinent to this issue-You Decide:

Obama’s Coming Attack on the Courts: Alert Posted on Recently Published News Max Magazine:

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/mar09/?s=al&promo_code=8061-1

These are pertinent excerpts from the review of this alarming magazine article:

“More than any of his recent predecessors, President Barack Obama will have an opportunity to dangerously realign America’s courts with activist judges.

With one-time law professor Obama in the White House and a Democratic majority in Congress, the ruling party stands ready to launch the biggest assault on conservative jurisprudence since the Earl Warren Court with the appointment of federal judges.

Will Republicans be able to stave off what could be seen as the legal rollback of the Reagan Revolution?

Newsmax magazine’s special report “Judges Are Not Our Rulers: Obama’s Coming Plan to Liberalize America’s Courts” examines what is likely in store for the courts under the administration of the first president who, as a senator, participated in the filibuster of Bush judicial appointments.

This exclusive Newsmax report explores:

  • The biggest fear among conservative legal activists
  • The key cases that could soon test federal courts’ political stance
  • Why Obama’s judicial philosophy shocked leading GOP senators
  • The “greatest hits” in outrageous Democrat-sponsored jurisprudence
  • How the “blue slip” rule can torpedo judicial appointments
  • The real agenda for legalizing same-sex marriage
  • The “conservative nightmare scenario” regarding the courts
  • Why Obama wants judges to employ “empathy” in dealing with cases
  • The legal moves that most threaten religious organizations
  • The “Shangri-La” of judicial conservatism
  • How Republicans can inflict political costs for judicial nominees
  • The study assessing Democratic and Republican courts and its surprising result
  • Obama’s point man on judicial appointments
  • The pending bill that will federalize the abortion issue
  • Why federal judges wield tremendous power
  • What Obama’s appointees tell about the future of the courts
  • The lesson Obama has learned from Ronald Reagan
  • How a political maneuver will bolster Democrats’ control of the courts
  • How the district courts and appellate courts interact
  • Why the “Gang of 14” angered conservatives
  • The best hope for reappointment among Bush’s judicial candidates
  • How court decisions could imperil national security

And much more.”

American Eagle-Mine

NoteThese articles and/or blog posts relate to and/or support this issue-You Decide:

36 STATES DID NOT RATIFY 17TH AMENDMENT – WHAT WILL STATES DO?-Posted on News With Views-By Devvy, NewsWithViews.com-On
January 16, 2012: 


http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd522.htm

Obama’s Judicial Nominees Deemed “Unqualified” by ABA!-Posted on American for Constitutional Government Reform–On January 7, 2012:

http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/01-851/

Ratings Shrink President’s List for Judgeships!Posted on The New York Times-By CHARLIE SAVAGE-On November 22, 2011:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/us/politics/screening-panel-rejects-many-obama-picks-for-federal-judgeships.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&utm_source=EmailDirect.com&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=010612+Campaign-2

American Eagle-Mine

Note: These blog posts relate to and/or support this issue-You Decide:

NYC Police: Terror Suspects Wanted to Commit Jihad!

This blog post contains an article that should put some chills down each American’s spine because, it proves that our biggest terrorist threat here at home is from our own “home grown terrorists”, the likes of Bill Ayers and his 1960’s Weather Underground cronies, who set the example for others to follow without retributionYou Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/nyc-police-terror-suspects-wanted-to-commit-jihad/

Do Alinsky’s Rules Define This Administration’s Governing Style?

This blog post contains articles that revel that we are witnessing the ramped use of Alinky’s Rules by this President, his administration and/or individuals/organizations connected to them-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/

Another Imminent Homeland & National Security Issue!

This blog post reveals that I, as a Veteran, believe that some deplorable and hap-hazard actions taken by this President and his administration, along with the Democratic majority in Congress, not only threaten our Homeland and National Security, but are systematically eroding our Constitution and will ultimately destroy this great country of ours-You Decide:

These are just a few examples of what I believe to be their deplorable actions:

  • DHS Extremist Alert Report Targeting Veterans, President apologizing to the world, to include our enemies here at home and abroad, for this country’s alleged arrogance;
  • Trying and convicting members of our Armed Forces for killing their enemies and, in the heat of battle, allegedly other innocent civilian by-standers; and
  • Are open to investigating, and possibly prosecuting, officials and lawyers involved in the drafting of the allegedly harsh water-boarding interrogation techniques, although there is credible evidence that shows that the application of these procedures are credited with keeping us safe from other terrorist attacks.

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/another-imminent-homeland-national-security-issue/

It’s Getting Very Serious Now!

This blog post contains an article that reveals that the MIAC profiled certain people as being potential violence-prone “militia members”: including people who supported Presidential candidates Ron Paul, and Bob Barr. In addition, anyone who opposed one or more of the following were also included in the list: the New World Order, the U.N., gun control, the violation of Posse Comitatus, the Federal Reserve, the Income Tax, the Ammunition Accountability Act, a possible Constitutional Convention, the North American Union, the Universal Service Program, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), abortion on demand, or illegal immigration-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/

Comment:  As a Latino I adamantly disagree with and literally deplore the President’s reasoning behind his appointment of a supposedly empathetic minority (AKA: Radical Liberal) Supreme Court Justice, while disregarding what I would consider to be other more critical qualifications, along with pertinent court experience requirements, to include the content of their character and interpretation of the Constitution.

Regardless of my ethnic background and somewhat overwhelming life adversities, upon enlisting into the U.S. Marine Corps and during my twenty year tenure I was systematically promoted from the enlisted rank of Private to the Commissioned Officer rank of Captain based solely on my performance and merits and not on my ethnic background, race or life adversities.

And I honestly wouldn’t have it any other way.  I am who I am today because  of my twenty year tenure in the Marine Corps where I learned and honestly believe that adversities multiply the end benefit, build character and make you a better person.

I also believe that the President’s decision has little to do with him historically appointing the first Latina to the Supreme Court, but more to do with him covertly attempting to further his own radical agenda of continuing to erode our “Constitution” and destroying our country, knowing very well that if anyone dares to disagree with his appointment and/or attempts to block his appointment, they will be labeled as a “racist” and we now know that we are a nation of cowards when it comes to dealing with racism, as our illustrious U.S. Attorney General eloquently informed us during his acceptance speech, along with being “cold hearted” because they are not sympathetic to the historical appointment of a minority woman with overwhelming life adversities to the Supreme Court.

An action that I also believe will further divide our country by pitting individuals of differing ethnic backgrounds against Latinos, which seems to be just fine with the President as evidenced by his other numerous deplorable actions, which I believe are permanently dividing our country to a point of no return. And, if he continues without restraint, his actions will more than likely cause civil unrest and/or an uprising, which may be his ultimate goal because it would allow him to declare Marshal Law” as a means of doing away with our “Constitutional Rights” and take over as our country’s life-long dictator-You Decide.

American Eagle-Mine

Note:  The above articles and/or blog posts and videos relate to and/or support my following blog posts-You Decide:

Is Obama looking for empathy by another name in his supreme court nominee?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/is-obama-looking-for-empathy-by-another-name-in-his-court-nominee/

President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/president-and-doj-have-contributed-to-the-racial-mess-in-our-country/

The Racial Mess!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/the-racial-mess/

Obama is fomenting a race war?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/obama-is-fomenting-a-race-war/

Obama’s Arizona Immigration Law Hypocritical Lie!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/obama’s-arizona-immigration-law-hypocritical-lie/

Game Change’:  New Book Reveals 2008 Campaigns’ Messy Moments-To Include Racism!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/game-change-new-book-reveals-2008-campaigns-messy-moments-to-include-racism/

Were We Forewarned About What to Expect If President Obama Got Elected?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/11/were-we-forewarned-about-what-to-expect-if-president-obama-got-elected/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Where Is America Today?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-obamas-resignation/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/disclaimer/

“Food For Thought”

God Bless the U.S.A.!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q65KZIqay4E&feature=related 

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question:  Are you aware that a large majority of our senior citizen’s and numerous other Americans that do not have access to and/or are not internet savvy are literally being kept in the dark when it comes to the President’s eligibility requirements under Article II, Section I of our Constitution and other negative issues affecting our country because they rely solely on the Main Stream Media (MSM) to educate themselves while our President, his administration and minions covertly erode our “Constitutional Rights” and ultimately destroy this great country of ours?

The following article and/or blog post contains an article that reveals a concerted effort by World Net Daily to bring the President’s eligibility issue to the forefront by erecting billboards around the country asking where the President’s missing birth certificate is, which I believe is a great idea, but some Americans seem to be concerned that the billboards may not contain enough information to get the most bang for the buck because the President’s name does not appear on them and, as I mentioned above, many individuals still have no idea that there is a problem with the President’s eligibility status, which revolves around the missing original (long form-vault copy) of his birth certificate-You Decide:

Birth certificate billboard mania continues “First sign erected in ‘truth and transparency’ campaign”: Posted on WND-On May 2o, 2009:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98724#

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“WASHINGTON – More than $25,000 has been raised in the first two days of a national billboard campaign to raise awareness of questions surrounding the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as president – and the first sign, an electronic one, is already up and online.

Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, said he’s calling it “the truth and transparency campaign.”

The money is being used to erect billboards around the country that ask a simple question: “Where’s the birth certificate?”

The first such sign to be posted under the 2-day-old campaign, a digital, electronic one, is up and online on Highway 165 in Ball, La. – the result of a donation by the owner. In addition, based on the heavy volume of financial donations in the first two days of the campaign, WND was able to commit to leasing two more standard billboards – one in Los Angeles and the other in Pennsylvania. It will take several weeks to get those billboards up because of the vinyl printing and shipping involved.

“I know now, because of the sensational response to this idea from WND viewers, that this national campaign is going to be big and long-lasting,” said Farah. “I want to thank all of those who have pitched in and contributed – with either cash donations or, in some cases, space donations. But the need for money continues. The public should know it costsabout $2,000 just to print these 15-by-45 foot billboards. Each one is a huge commitment.”

Donations are being accepted to defray the costs of a national billboard campaign with the simple message: “Where’s the birth certificate?”

While the campaign is off to a great start, many viewers have asked why Obama’s name is not included in the billboard. Farah said the matter was carefully considered.

“There are several reasons we chose the message: ‘Where’s the birth certificate?'” he explained. “There is only one birth certificate controversy in this country today – despite the near-total absence of this issue from coverage in the non-WND media. This is a grass-roots issue that resonates around the country, as our own online petition with nearly 400,000 signers suggests. In addition, I like the simplicity of the message. I like the fact that the message will cause some people to ask themselves or others about the meaning of the message. It will stir curiosity. It will create a buzz. I’m assuming when these billboards are springing up all over the country, it might even make some in the news media curious. And there’s one more factor that persuaded me this was the way to go.

“Come 2012, campaign laws will pose restrictions on political advertising mentioning the names of presidential candidates. This one clearly doesn’t. I would like to see the federal government make the case that this is somehow a political ad,” he said.

Farah said the campaign was born of frustration with timid elected officials in Washington, corrupt judges around the country and a news media that show a stunning lack of curiosity about the most basic facts of Obama’s background – especially how it relates to constitutional eligibility for the highest office in the land.

“As Obama transforms this country from self-governing constitutional republic to one governed by a central ruling elite, the simple fact remains that no controlling legal authority has established that he is indeed a ‘natural born citizen’ as the Constitution requires,” Farah said. “Obama’s promises of transparency have become a bad joke as he continues to hide simple, innocuous documents like his birth certificate and his student records.”

The idea behind the billboard campaign is to make sure Obama cannot avoid this question any longer. He must be asked to produce it at every turn, Farah says. Billboard space is currently being hunted in Houston,Dallas, San Antonio, Sacramento, San Francisco, New York-New Jersey, Des Moines, Seattle and other metro areas.

“Is it unusual for a news agency to launch such a campaign?” asks Farah. “Yes it is. But we live in very unusual times. The founding fathers built special protections into the First Amendment for the free press. The reason they did that is because they understood a vibrant ‘Fourth Estate’ was necessary as an independent watchdog on government. It is in that tradition that WND assumes this role – since nobody else in the press will do it.”

WND previously launched a petition campaign that has collected more than 370,000 names demanding Obama’s eligibility be verified and demonstrated publicly.

That campaign continues. That list has been shared with members of the Electoral College and the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

“I wish such a campaign were not absolutely necessary,” said Farah. “I wish there were checks and balances in our political and electoral systems to ensure that constitutional eligibility of presidential candidates was established before politicians could assume the highest office in the land. I wish my colleagues in the news media believed the Constitution really means what it says and pressed this issue as hard as we have pressed it at WND. I wish radio talk-show hosts were bold enough to ask this question. But wishing is not enough. It’s time to raise the visibility of this issue vital to the rule of law in America. I ask everyone to pitch in and help WND make a simple yet profound statement: The Constitution still matters.”

Undercover sting catches NPR talking about Obama birth: ‘To run for president you have to be born in the U.S.’-Posted on WND.com-On March 8, 2011:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=272677

Note: My recent blogs relate to this issue-You Decide:

President Obama’s Eligibility Status Press Release!

This blog contains a Press Release that I e-mailed to all News Media outlets and are shared with you in hopes that you will do the same, as a means of standing up for and defending our eroding “Constitutional Rights” under this President and his administration, that will ultimately destroy this great country of ours-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/president-obama’s-eligibility-status-press-release/

Letters E-Mailed To NM U.S. Senators & U.S. Congressman:

This blog contains a copy of a letter that I e-mailed to my NM U.S. Senators and U.S. Congressman on May 19, 2009, and would like to share it with you in hopes that you do the same, as a means of standing up for and defending our “Constitutional Rights,” which I adamantly believe are systematically and covertly being eroded by this President and his administration, which will ultimately destroy this great country of oursYou Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/letters-e-mails-sent-requesting-president-obama’s-eligibility-status/

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008!

This blog contains a summary of the results of my extensive research into Senator Obama’s personal and career background, which I conducted as a means of educating myself prior to casting my ballot, that was completed on November 3, 2008 (two days prior to the election), along with a list of unanswered questions and numerous concerns relating to his lack of executive experience, seemingly shady background and association with radical individuals and/or organizations (Tell me who you hang around with and I’ll tell you who you are!)-You Decide:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

Note The above articles and/or blog posts, and talk radio show clip relate to and/or support my following blog posts-You Decide:

Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/who-owns-our-supposedly-fair-and-balanced-airwaves-and-news-outlets/

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/could-the-president’s-newly-released-colb-be-a-forgery/

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/why-obama-is-ineligible-–-regardless-of-his-birthplace/

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/hawaii-elections-clerk-obama-birth-not-here/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Obama’s paltry paper trail raises serious questions!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/obamas-paltry-paper-trail-raises-serious-questions/

New investigation into Obama background spells trouble ahead!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/new-investigation-into-obama-background-spells-trouble-ahead/

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/clearing-the-smoke-on-obama’s-eligibility/

Nearly 1/2 of U.S. Citizens Are Now Saying That Obama Is Not A Legitimate President!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/nearly-12-of-u-s-citizens-are-now-saying-that-obama-is-not-a-legitimate-president/

First Time In History That a Member of Congress Has Questioned a Sitting President’s Eligibility!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/first-time-in-history-that-a-member-of-congress-has-questioned-a-sitting-president’s-eligibility/

Why did a black preacher from Harlem have a “hit” placed on his life?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/why-has-a-black-preacher-from-harlem-received-a-“hit”-on-his-life/

Key Witness In Obama’s Passport Fraud Case Fatally Shot!

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/19/key_witness_in_obama’s_passport_fraud_case_fatally_shot.thtml

The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/the-obama-birth-certificate-protection-act/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

Where Is America Today?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-obamas-resignation/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america-2/

A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/disclaimer/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Question: What are the Russians saying about what’s going on in America today?

This article  from the Russian newspaper Pravda reveals the Russian’s view of what has been happening in America.  If this article dosen’t put chills down your spine, then it confirms what the Russians are saying about Americans being a passive, hapless sheeple-You Decide:

American Capitalism Gone With A Whimper!-Posted on Pravada.Ru-By Stanislav Mishim-On April 27, 2009:

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/27-04-2009/107459-american_capitalism-0/

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.

True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years.The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was.

But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists.

Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.

First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their “right” to choke down a McDonalds burger or a BurgerKing burger than for their constitutional rights.

Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our “democracy”.  Pride blind the foolish.

Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different “branches and denominations” were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the “winning” side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another.

Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the “winning” side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America.

The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama.

His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive.His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America’s short history, but in the world.

If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.

These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all.

First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison.

Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?

These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties and powers of the American congress (parliament). Again, congress has put up little more then a whimper to their masters.

Then came Barack Obama’s command that GM’s (General Motor) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of “pure” free markets, the American president now has the power, the self given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will. Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions.

So it should be no surprise that the American president has followed this up with a “bold” move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too.

Prime Minister Putin, less then two months ago, warned Obama and UK’s Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster.Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians so let our“wise”Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride.

Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper…but a “freeman” whimper.

So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set “fair” maximum salaries, evaluate performance and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses?

Senator Barney Franks, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort. He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive.

The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left.

The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker.

Stanislav Mishin”

Note:   This is another article that was found in the Russian Pravada newspaper by Mark S. McGrew McGrewMX@aol.com:

“This is what a Soviet newspaper writes about Obama. Its funny how clear Russian’s see the follies of Obama while American’s have become blinded enough to over look our constitution in order to co-operate!

I’m sending you folks materials that Obama and his terrorist, revolutionary, communist and liberal buddies most likely know about. Obama said, he’s going to change the world.

I’m a military brat therefore moving fifty times within my life has taken place.

My observations & experiences are being reflected in the materials I’m providing you folks. Don’t expect others to be fair, play by the rules or even be legal, moral, ethical and biblical.”

The Mysterious Shadow: Code Name Obama!-Posted on Pravda.RuBy Mark S. McGrew-On December 18, 2008:

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/106848-0/

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“This document (http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=960653960) alone raises a big question.

It is his registration in the State of Illinois for his license to practice Law.

The document has a space to list any other names that have been used. Even though he has used other names, this shows, “None”. The other names he has used, that we currently know are: Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham.

During the Presidential debates with Senator John McCain, Obama never once addressed his opponent as “Senator McCain” or “Mr. McCain”.

Most people, who have any common courtesy at all, when speaking to their elders, or a senator, would address that person with some degree of respect and use his proper title.

Senator McCain has more experience than Obama, is older, has risked his life for his country and does address other people, whatever their position, with respect. Obama, with a look of contempt, addressed Senator McCain as “John this” or “John that”.

Not once did he show any basic courtesy or manners to a war veteran, a 25 year member of the United States Senate, a man 25 years his senior. John McCain was a Senator before Obama even knew what name to call himself.

Obama was sued in Federal Court to produce his birth certificate. He refused and instead hired two legal firms to make up reasons why he shouldn’t have to. The case was taken to the United States Supreme Court and they also asked him to respond. Again, he refused.

Obama took an oath to defend the Constitution. Instead he speaks of changing it.

There are other lawsuits that Obama is not responding to. In this photograph, we see Obama refusing to Salute the American flagand say the pledge of Allegiance as everyone else on the stage was doing.

He doesn’t respect American citizens asking to see if he is eligible to be President.

He doesn’t respect the United States Federal Court or the United States Supreme Court or the United States Constitution.

And if he was smoking pot and using cocaine as he says in is book, he doesn’t even respect himself.

This document, a Certification of Life Birth states Obama’s place of birth as Hawaii, but is also says at the bottom, “any alterations invalidate this certificate” and at the top right, the certificate number is blacked out.

This officially invalidates the document and you or I could not use this to get a driver’s license, but Obama expects to get the White House with it.

Obama’s own web site, FightTheSmearts.com does not say that he is a “natural born” citizen. Instead they admit: “The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.”

And it goes on to admit further that he is not a “Natural Born” citizen when they say: “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire.

As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”

In order to be a Natural Born citizen, one parent can not be a foreign citizen, and Obama’s web site discloses that his father was a British subject. If Obama or Soetoro or Dunham had been born on the floor of the Oval Office, he is not eligible to be President.

Barack Obama is no longer an attorney as he is “voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law” as of 2008.

His wife, Michelle Obama has not been an attorney since 1993, and the Illinois registration says: “Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law” and “attorney is on court ordered inactive status”, long before her children were born. She was an attorney for only four years, having quit 15 years ago.

The amount of speculation into Obama’s past is absolutely stunning.

Trying to trace his past is like climbing a tree. As soon as you start up the trunk, there are alternate branches, and the branches have branches and then more branches.

It may be impossible to obtain correct information on his life. As some people have said, it is like trying to prove Sequatchie, UFOs or ghosts exist. There is evidence to suggest he is “here” but no verifiable proof that he has the past that he claims. Or the present.

There is no proof that his grandmother died on the day his campaign said she did. The only announcement of her death that can be found is from his campaign people.

But, who told them?

There is no record. I absolutely defy anyone to prove that his grandmother, Madelyn Payne Lee Dunham died in Hawaii on November 2nd or 3rd of the year 2008.

Obama has spent an estimated $500,000 or more on legal fess to keep his birth certificate from being seen. For $25 or less, or probably no more than a phone call and a fax to Hawaii he can release his birth certificate and shut everybody up, once and for all. But he won’t do that.

Anyone can ask for their privacy to be respected, but in America, there is no such thing as a “Right” to privacy.

If a person were asking the citizens to allow him to be their President, it would be in that person’s interest for the public to know every thing there is to know about him. Unless there is some extremely bad news.

American’s have elected criminals of all sorts to public office. Felons and minor criminals serve our country. A person sitting in a Federal Penitentiary, with a life sentence is able to run for public office, including the Presidency.

If American’s will allow a person with a criminal past or present to hold office, what exactly does Obama have to fear in letting the public see him?

Other records that he refuses to release are:

Original, vault copy of Certificate of Live Birth in the USA

Obama/Dunham marriage license

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license

Soetoro adoption records

Punahou School records

Selective Service Registration(Released. But, is possibly an altered Document)

Occidental College records

Passport

Columbia College records

Columbia thesis

Harvard College records

Harvard Law Review articles(None (maybe 1, Not Signed)

University of Chicago scholarly articles(None)

Baptism certificate

Medical records

Law practice client list

Illinois State Senate records(None (Locked up to prohibit public view)

Illinois State Senate schedule(Lost (All other Illinois state senators’ records are intact)

With all of Obama’s different names, with his documented long term relations to convicted criminals, with his active efforts to prohibit us from knowing where he was born, with his active efforts to keep us from seeing his credentials, with his documented registration to practice law showing only one name, with his being an ex-attorney not authorized to practice law, but representing himself as such, with his non-existent

“Office of The President Elect”, with the dozen or so lawsuits against him to prove his citizenship, with the various promises he made to voters and has since reneged on, with his documented complete lack of respect to America, with his refusal to salute the American flag and refusal to say the Pledge of Allegiance with others on stage and his other disrespectful actions, with his many millions of dollars in campaign funds suspected to be from foreign sources, with campaign donations accepted from possible terrorists groups, with his planned first official act as President to make a speech to the Muslim world in a Muslim Capitol, Obama has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he can not in any way, shape or form be trusted.

With his association with William Ayers, a man who advocated and tried a violent overthrow of the US Government in which people did die, with his associations with Communist Party and Socialist Party organizations, with his financial support of Raila Odingo, a cousin in Kenya who, because elections didn’t turn out as he wanted them to, caused riots, the burning and destruction of several hundred Christian churches, several thousand deaths, rapes and hundreds of thousands of displaced citizens in Kenya, Obama has shown that he has no qualms about violence being used to effect “change”.

And especially, with the major news sources in America constant, steady, upbeat, relentless promotion of his unproven abilities and undocumented history, their absolute refusal to investigate or even question his eligibility to be President, with their constant attacks and insults against anyone who dares to question, with their subtle threats of riots or even civil war if Obama is not placed in the White House, there are serious concerns that Obama is not destined to be America’s President, but instead, won his votes from an incredibly mis-informed public, it is apparent that America is being forced to accept him.

Regardless of the conspiracy theories, suspicions, accusations and investigations about Obama, the simple questions that stand out above all others: Is anyone in our military, any Federal employee, our Congress, our Senate, our Federal law enforcement agencies, our Federal intelligence agencies willing to follow his orders?

Are they legally able to obey his orders?

If they do obey his orders, and he is later declared to be ineligible, will the people who followed his orders be subjected to Nuremberg type trials in an International Court?

Will a future administration be able to prosecute Obama and his followers, as Alberto Gonzales confirmed to President George Bush in regards to torturing prisoners?

There are various people and organizations in America going to incredible efforts to uncover the truth, any truth, about Obama. Lawsuits have been filed in State Courts. There are five lawsuits filed in the US Supreme Court with three of them pending now.

State Courts and Federal Courts have taken the position that citizens do not have a right to verify that a Presidential candidate is eligible. Under the logic they use, there is not an entity on Earth who can ask a candidate to prove he is qualified under the US Constitution.

Dr. Orly Taitz has filed two separate lawsuits in the US Supreme Court, but on December 17, 2008 Justice Kennedy denied one case, without giving a reason. Dr. Taitz will re-file with a different Justice soon.

There is one lawsuit that may be filed, that no one can deny that the plaintiffs have a Constitutional Right, a legal Right and a God given Right to verify the eligibility of a Presidential candidate: Military officers.

Military officers take an oath to defend the US Constitution against enemies, foreign and domestic.

But more importantly, they have an obligation and a duty to refuse any order that they determine to be illegal.

Any military service member who carries out an order that he should know is illegal, can and will be Court Marshaled. Penalties range from being released from service to imprisonment to being executed, depending on the event. Any military personnel who would like to be included in a lawsuit against Obama to prove he is legitimate should contact Orly Taitz or any number of other attorneys with lawsuits in process. Type in your search bar…Obama lawsuit…and you will find them.

Every American who is concerned about this situation needs to take some action today.

If you can’t join the fight, then find someone to support financially. Most of the people filing these lawsuits and their lawyers are doing so with their own money. Most of the people on the Internet, trying to get the truth out, are using their own money.

If you can’t take the time or don’t know what you can do, send money. Win or lose, you will at least know you were a part of history.

If Obama takes office and if Obama creates his civilian mandatory work program, forcing people to work for three months, as he and Rahm Emanuel have repeatedly said, and you did send somebody 10 bucks, at least you and your family are going to know you tried. Or, keep the ten dollars, buy stamps and you can keep in touch sending postcards from camp to camp to each other and no one will have any sympathy for you.

With the turmoil Americans are facing in the Obama Presidency, the World also will suffer.

International political, business and military affairs always have operated on a level of trust. Those levels vary with the wind, but can any World leader trust a man who has no past, no allegiance and no respect for the society that enabled him to run for public office?

If a person has no loyalty and no respect to the people and the Nation that enabled him to succeed, he is incapable of being loyal about anything, to any purpose or to any person.

Obama will have millions of soldiers and thousands of nuclear weapons at his disposal along with everything else in the arsenal of the American military. How can any country trust this man not to push the button?

Any Treaty or agreement of any kind can be rescinded by a future administration. Laws regarding international business can be rescinded.

The International Court can rescind anything Obama does.

This affair is the makings of a very well financed and influential group of criminal psychopaths. Obama is simply the mouthpiece.

According to Obama’s own words in his books, he is nothing but a pot smoking crack head street punk that some rich white guys found and made him take a shower and put on a tie.

Until Obama releases the records and accomplishments of his past, no one can prove otherwise. Hearsay is not admissible in Court and hearsay is all we have to listen to about Obama.

And yet, another huge question, and most mysterious of all is, why him? Of all the thousands of eligible people in the Democratic and Republican parties, WHY would they present two people to become a future president, with both being accused of not being Natural Born citizens?

The most controversial choice of the two and the most disturbing to society is Obama, the man who has no more verifiable occurrences in his life than a comic book character. WHY, a man with so many secrets in his life, with so many gaping holes in his stories and so many mischievous, socially unacceptable characters in his life, why this one?

It must be considered that it is all a hoax and the intention has always been, since day one, to create a firestorm of opposition and chaos and confusion that produce some grand savior who will step in and declare a “mistrial” in the 2008 elections and keep the same people in the White House for another four years.

All these questions, all of the suspicions, all the missing links, all the investigations and lawsuits, all the rumors and all the theories, all of the mistrust and all of the little or big mistakes that Obama has made can disappear, just as if a thermonuclear explosion had vaporized them, if only Obama would produce a birth certificate that shows where and when he was born. What possible reason would any person have to not make a simple exchange like that?

Even children know, that a person who tells people over and over what he has done, but refuses to prove it, is called many names that are unfit to publish.

For me, somebody running around bragging, with nothing to back it up, is just a sissy and there is nothing more dangerous than a sissy with a gun.

Mark S. McGrew can be reached at McGrewMX@aol.com

Note:  These are articles and/or blog posts that were published in 2010 that reveal the Russian’s views relating to President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth (COLB)-You Decide:

No evidence of Hawaiian birth for AKA Obama. What about Kenya?Posted on PRAVADA-On September 19, 2010:

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/feedback/17-09-2010/114965-obama_birth_certificate-0/

Pravda Does it Again; No evidence of Hawaiian birth for AKA Obama. What about Kenya?-Posted on BirtherReport.com-On September 19, 2010:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/09/pravda-does-it-again-no-evidence-of.html

NoteWhat follows is a culmination of more than 100 years of negligence and disregard of the global Marxist infection contaminating the world, to include how the the destiny of America follows the steps of Russian Empire in its demise by Alexander Gofen-You Decide:

Comparative analysis of demise of the Russian Empire in 1917 and of the United States of America now!-By Alexander Gofen-On December 28, 2011:  

http://www.resonoelusono.com/2008vs1917.htm

Note:  The following articles and/or blog posts relate to and/or support the above articles and/or blog posts and videos-You Decide:

Obama-Sheep Never Stalk The Tiger

Sheep Never Stalk The Tiger!Posted on Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On February 23, 2014:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2014/02/23/sheep-never-stalk-the-tiger/print/

NWO-Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away

Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away (Part 20)!Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 18, 2014:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/americans-like-nazi-germans-don-t-notice-that-all-of-our-rights-7

Russian writer: ‘Obama’s fools, Stalin’s fools share the same drink of illusion’!-Posted on Examiner-By CHRISTOPHER COLLINS-On November 19, 2012:

http://www.examiner.com/article/russian-writer-obama-s-fools-stalin-s-fools-share-the-same-drink-of-illusion?cid=db_articles

Communist Party Leader: Obama Victory “Dawn of a New Era”!- Posted on TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On November 9, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPost%3A1106136&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post

Obama’s Ultimate Cover-up!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On August 5, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-s-ultimate-cover-up?xg_source=activity

Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s 2008 Campaign’!Posted on TeaParty.org-By Jake Martinez-On July 30, 2012:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/who-ran-cover-for-obama-s-islamic-background-tracing-the-politics

Communists and Muslims: The Hidden Hand of the KGB!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On July 29, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/communists-and-muslims-the-hidden-hand-of-the-kgb

White Reds Exploiting Blacks: The Weather Underground, Barack Obama, and the Fundamental Transformation of the United States!Posted on We The People USA- By Jake Martinez-On July 28, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/white-reds-exploiting-blacks-the-weather-underground-barack-obama?xg_source=activity

The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’!Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez on July 24, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-vetting-obama-radical-islam-and-the-soros-connection?xg_source=activity

Letter to Congressman Allen West Regarding Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse Allegations!Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On July 28, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-congressman-allen-west-regarding-sheriff-arpaio-s-col-2?xg_source=activity

Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Congressman Martin Heinrich Regarding My Request For Full-scale Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arapio’s Cold Case Posse!Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On July 26, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/follow-up-letter-to-nm-u-s-congressman-martin-heinrich-regardin-1?xg_source=activity

Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Jeff Bingaman Regarding My Request For Full-scale Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On July 26, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/follow-up-letter-to-nm-u-s-senator-jeff-bingaman-regarding-my-1?xg_source=activity

Follow-up Letter to NM Governor Martinez Requesting The Removal of President Obama From The NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot!Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez on July 26, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/follow-up-letter-to-nm-governor-martinez-regarding-the-removal-5?xg_source=activity

Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Udall Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On July 25, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/follow-up-letter-to-nm-u-s-senator-udall-requesting-congression-6?xg_source=activity

The coming chaos from the Obama-Soertoro playbook!’Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez on April 24, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-coming-chaos-from-the-obama-soertoro-playbook?xg_source=activity

Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Udall Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 24, 2012:

http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/follow-up-letter-to-nm-u-s-senator-udall-requesting-congression-1?xg_source=activity

Note:  The above articles and/or blog posts relate to and/or support my following blog posts-You Decide:

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house-2/

Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/why-obama-is-ineligible-–-regardless-of-his-birthplace/

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama birth not here!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/hawaii-elections-clerk-obama-birth-not-here/

Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedes-obama-eligibility-unvetted/

DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/dc-knows-that-obama-is-ineligible-for-office/

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/clearing-the-smoke-on-obama’s-eligibility/

What we haven’t been told about the President’s background!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/what-we-haven’t-been-told-about-the-president’s-background/

Were We Forewarned About What to Expect If President Obama Got Elected?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/11/were-we-forewarned-about-what-to-expect-if-president-obama-got-elected/

Was the Economic Crisis Manufactured?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/was-the-economic-crisis-manufactured/

Who’s Behind the Financial Crisis?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/06/who’s-behind-the-financial-crisis/

Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s campaign finances!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/active-complaint-to-the-fec-over-president-obama’s-campaign-finances/

Progressives and Communists Are Out of the Closet Together!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/progressives-and-communists-are-out-of-the-closet-together/

The Midterm Elections and the Communist Manifesto!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/the-midterm-elections-and-the-communist-manifesto/

Progressive group maps out President Obama’s strategy for next 2 years!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/19/progressive-group-maps-out-president-obama’s-strategy-for-next-2-years/

Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/is-it-important-to-understand-the-marxist-assault-on-the-foundations-of-our-system/

The Wall Street Bailout Bill Threatens Our Bottom Line!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/the-wall-street-bailout-bill-threatens-our-bottom-line/

Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/02/11/godfather-of-the-islamic-revolution/

The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/the-islamic-infiltration-inside-our-government-armed-with-our-secrets/

Could Steps That Team Obama Has Taken Be Emboldening Terrorists?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/could-steps-that-team-obama-has-taken-be-emboldening-terrorists/

Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-to-u-s-national-security/

White House Quietly Courts Muslims in U.S.!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/white-house-quietly-courts-muslims-in-u-s/

Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/islam’s-child-martyrs-in-america/

Rising Muslim Hopes from Obama’s Outreach May Backfire!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/rising-muslim-hopes-from-obama’s-outreach-may-backfire/

FBI, Department of Homeland Security and Joint Terrorism Task Force Raid Militia Groups!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/28/fbi-department-of-homeland-security-and-joint-terrorism-task-force-raid-militia-groups/

Subpoenas issued for Fort Hood Records!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/subpoenas-issued-for-fort-hood-records/

Is President Obama’s Shameful Politics Harming The CIA?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/is-president-obama’s-shameful-politics-harming-the-cia/

Are Intelligence Personnel Empowered to Employ Their Ingenuity and Resourcefulness to Connect The Dots?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/08/are-intelligence-personnel-empowered-to-employ-their-ingenuity-and-resourcefulness-to-connect-the-dots/

Why Should Terrorists Be Given The Extraordinary Protections That You and I Have As American Citizens?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/why-should-terrorists-be-given-the-extraordinary-protections-that-you-and-i-have-as-american-citizens/

Another Imminent Homeland & National Security Issue!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/another-imminent-homeland-national-security-issue/

Obama and Holder’s Hidden Agenda!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/obama-and-holders-hidden-agenda/

Nuclear Summit Part of Obama Administration’s ‘Fantasy Foreign Policy’

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/nuclear-summit-part-of-obama-administration’s-‘fantasy-foreign-policy’/

President Obama says USA still working on its democracy!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/13/what-did-president-obama-mean-when-he-recently-said-that-the-usa-was-still-working-on-its-democracy/

The Reason for the Treason!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/the-reason-for-the-treason/

Obamacare Lawsuits!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/obama-care-lawsuits/

Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’t-trust-the-government/

How ABC, CBS and NBC Have Dismissed and Disparaged the Tea Party Movement!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/how-abc-cbs-and-nbc-have-dismissed-and-disparaged-the-tea-party-movement/

Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/obamanites-get-violent-in-support-of-the-agenda/

Restoring Honor In America!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/restoring-honor-in-america/

Where Is America Today?

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/where-is-america-today-2/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america-2/

Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-for-obamas-resignation/

Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/washington-times-calls-for-obama’s-impeachment/

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:

https://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/disclaimer/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »