Question: Will the Obama Administration’s supposed new nuclear arms agreement with Russia, which is intended to replace the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), undermine our Nuclear Security?
The following article reveals the disturbing answer to this question-You Decide:
A START towards Undermining Our Nuclear Security-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 25, 2010:
These are pertinent excerpts from this article:
“Yesterday the Kremlin announced that the Obama administration and Russia had reached agreement on a new nuclear arms agreement intended to replace the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). The declaration appeared to surprise the White House, as Press Secretary Robert Gibbs could only confirm that the two sides were “close” to a treaty. But U.S. officials confirm that “all major obstacles” in negotiations with Moscow have been cleared.
Russian approval of a new START agreement has been the cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s “long road toward eliminating nuclear weapons” policy. President Obama’s desire to appease Russia is why he began negotiations by unilaterally surrendering to Kremlin demands that the United States betray our Czech Republic and Polish allies by going back on our promise to build ballistic missile defense facilities in Eastern Europe. Russians took President Obama’s easy and early capitulation on missile defense as a sign of naivete and weakness and concluded that the Obama administration was far more desperate for a new nuclear treaty than they were and, as The Los Angeles Times reports, “used that fact in negotiations.”
The full text of the new agreement has not been released, but early reports indicate that it will not adequately address three key issues and would therefore compromise U.S. national security:
Verification: The Russians have a long and well documented history of violating arms control agreements. By focusing intently on the reduction in each nation’s strategic arsenal, the U.S. has lost some negotiating ground on the issue of verification. The Senate must ensure that the new treaty is adequately verifiable. There is no reason to sign the treaty if the verification mechanisms fall by the wayside.
Nuclear Modernization: Some arms control advocates insist that the U.S. has a robust nuclear modernization program. This claim is simply inaccurate. The truth is that America’s nuclear infrastructure is rapidly aging, in deep atrophy, and is losing its reliability and effectiveness. The U.S. is not producing new nuclear weapons, and its ICBM force is shrinking and not being modernized. In contrast, Russia and China are engaged in a major modernization effort. On December 16, 41 U.S. Senators voiced their concerns and signed a letter saying they will oppose the new treaty if it does not include specific plans for U.S. nuclear modernization as stipulated in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010.
Missile Defense: It is absolutely imperative that a new START agreement not undermine our post-Cold War defensive posture by linking offensive weapons with missile defense. But early reports indicate that the treaty does exactly that. The New York Times reports: “Administration officials describing the draft treaty said its preamble recognized the relationship between offensive weapons and missile defense, but that the language was not binding.” But the Times goes on to quote retired major general Vladimir Dvorkin who says Moscow will scrap the treaty if the U.S. pursues missile defense: “If, for example, the U.S. unilaterally deploys considerable amounts of missile defense, then Russia has the right to withdraw from the agreement because the spirit of the preamble has been violated.”
The Obama Administration’s arms control strategy has been deeply flawed. It is based on outdated 1970s arms control strategy and 1960s idealism and naivete. It will not work because it does not account for Russian nuclear strategy, which is based on approximate parity between the two sides, Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), denial of missile defenses to the U.S., and nuclear warfighting capability. The U.S. needs to reset the reset before the Obama administration is allowed to seriously undermine our national security.”
Note: The following websites and report reveal that George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) funds: (a) organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending; (b) organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies; and, (c) the Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG), which is a liberal internationalist coalition of U.S. donors who believe the best way to prevent wars, constrain rogue nations, and prevent the spread of nuclear weapons is to let international laws and organizations set the terms of world peace. The umbrella group, whose listed supporters claim to have assets exceeding $25 billion, aims to entangle the U.S. government in a process of international negotiation to create a new global legal regime. It would likely limit U.S. sovereignty and replace a strong national defense with endless rounds of international rulemaking and consensus-building-You Decide:
(a) Organizations that advocate America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending:
- The American Friends Service Committee, which views America as the world’s chief source of international strife, has long had a friendly relationship with the Communist Party USA. Lamenting that “the United States spends 59% of the discretionary federal budget on military-related expenses,” the Committee seeks to “realign national spending priorities and to increase the portion of the budget that is spent on housing, quality education for all, medical care, and fair wages.” In 2000, George Soros himself was a signatory to a letter titled “Appeal for Responsible Security” that appeared in The New York Times. The letter called upon the U.S. government “to commit itself unequivocally to negotiate the worldwide reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons,” and to participate in “the global de-alerting of nuclear weapons and deep reduction of nuclear stockpiles.”
(b) Organizations that favor global government, which would bring American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations or other international bodies:
- According to George Soros, “We need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy.” Consistent with this perspective, the Open Society Institute in 2008 gave $150,000 to the United Nations Foundation, which “works to broaden support for the UN through advocacy and public outreach.” Moreover, OSI is considered a “major” funder of the Coalition for an International Criminal Court, which aims to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures in certain cases to an international prosecutor who could initiate capricious or politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. officials and military officers.
Guide to The George Soros Network-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:
(c) Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!-Posted on DiscoverTheNetworks.org:
The New Internationalism: Peace and Security Funders Group (PSFG)!-Posted on Capital Research Center-By John J. Tierney-On August 2009:
Question: Could it be true that the U.S. has sold 50% of its uranium to Russia and, if true, what’s wrong with this picture?
This recent article and/or blog post reveals the disturbing answer to this question-You Decide:
Russia set to control half of U.S. uranium output?-Posted on GlennBeck.com-On December 6, 2010:
Note: What follows is a WikiLeaks Cabel that reveals that the U.S. secretly agreed to give Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign key treaty-You Decide:
WikiLeaks cables: US agrees to tell Russia Britain’s nuclear secrets. ‘The US secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty’-Posted on The Daily Telegraph-By Matthew Moore, Gordon Rayner and Christopher Hope-On February 4, 2011:
Note: What follows are numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that relate to and/or support the above article and/or blog post-You Decide:
The coming chaos from the Obama-Soertoro playbook!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez on April 24, 2012:
Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Bingaman Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 13, 2012:
Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Congressman Heinrich Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 13, 2012:
Follow-up Letter to NM Governor Martinez Regarding The Removal of President Obama From The NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez on April 12, 2012:
Follow-up Letter To NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall Requesting Congressional Investigation Into Allegations Made By Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 11, 2012:
Obama’s Off-Mic Remarks to Medvedev Confirm His True Goal: Full Nuclear Disarmament, Say National Security Experts!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Burke-On April 10, 2012:
ForgeryGate: Blackmailed By Putin, Obama Betrays United States And Her Allies!-Posted on We The People USA-By Jake Martinez-On April 7, 2012:
The Russian Deception!-Posted on Global Watch Report-On April 2012:
Is Barack Obama A Soviet Spy?-Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On March 30, 2012:
Obama, The Russians, And Missile Defense: Historical Parallels!-Posted on Western Journalism-By PAUL G. KENGOR-On March 31, 2012:
Aw, How Nice Of You, Obama!!-Posted on Western Journalism-By MICHAEL REAGAN-On March 31, 2012:
Newt Gingrich Talks About Obama’s Russian “bend-over-and-grab-your-ankles”!-Posted on Western Journalism-By FLOYD BROWN-On March 27, 2012:
Obama’s ‘Flexibility’ on Missile Defense!-Posted on FrontPage Magazine-By Rick Moran-On March 27, 2012:
Obama tells Russia he will have ‘more flexibility’ after election!-Posted on The Hill-By Alicia M. Cohn-On March 26, 2012:
Obama Tells Secrets To Russia!-Posted on DickMorris.com-By Dick Morris-On March 21, 2012:
Obama Will Give Missile Tech To Russia Despite Law!-Posted on Western Journalism-By CRAIG COVELLO-On January 19, 2012:
Medvedev: Russia May Target US Missile Defense Sites!-Posted on NewsMax.com-On November 24, 2011:
Russia Fumes Over U.S. Missile Defense Ship!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On June 14, 2011:
The Administration Must Not Bend to Russian Missile Defense Demands-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 21, 2011:
Russia Warns US on Missile Plan, Balks on START-Posted on NewsMax.com-On February 7, 2011:
President Obama Signs START Treaty, Doesn’t Allow Reporters in the Room-Posted on ABCNews.com-By Jake Tapper-On February 02, 2011:
Russia: Obama Signed Away Missile Defenses-Posted on NewsMax.com-By William Chedsey-On January 5, 2011:
Video: Michelle Bachmann Says Obama Makes Us Less Safe-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On January 4, 2011:
Morning Bell: Merry Christmas, Moscow-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On December 22, 2010:
Stop, Don’t START!-Posted on Patriot Update-By Michael Reagan-On December 10, 2010:
Beijing’s Build-up and New START: ‘An arms-control treaty between the U.S. and Russia could advantage China.’-Posted on National Review Online-By PETER BROOKES-On December 9, 2010:
Morning Bell: This New START Is A Bad Deal At Any Time-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On December 1, 2010:
The Threat of New START: ‘New START logic: Russia poses no military threat, but we need New START immediately to protect us from the Russian military threat.’-Posted on National Review Online-By KEITH B. PAYNE & TOM SCHEBER-On November 15, 2010:
Obama, Clinton, Gates Pushing for ‘Lame-Duck’ Ratification of New Arms-Reduction Treaty-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On November 5, 2010:
START treaty passes first test-Posted on The Hill-By J. Taylor Rushing-On September 16, 2010:
Morning Bell: The New START Rubberstamp Threat to National Security-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 16, 2010:
Morning Bell: Neglecting Allies and Appeasing Foes-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 8, 2010:
Time to START Standing Up for America-Posted on Town Hall-By Phyllis Schlafly-On August 31, 2010:
Morning Bell: Let’s Not Make a Deal-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On July 27, 2010:
Morning Bell: New START, New Slogan … Trust But Don’t Verify-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On July 23, 2010:
New START’s Many Problems: What the Experts Say-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On July 15, 2010:
U.S. Arrests 10 on Charges of Being Agents for Russia-Posted on The New York Times-By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS-On June 28, 2010:
Morning Bell: No Rush to Judgment on New START-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On June 24, 2010:
Missile defense deal?-Posted on The Washington Times-By Bill Gertz-On June 16, 2010:
Morning Bell: The New START Threat to Missile Defense-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On May 18, 2010:
Morning Bell: Obama is No Reagan on Nuclear Strategy-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 12, 2010:
Obama Disarmament Tack Puts U.S. in Peril-Posted on NewsMax.com-By Frank Gaffney-On April 12, 2010:
The Obama Administration’s Ballistic Missile Defense Program: Treading Water in Shark-Infested Seas-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-By Baker Spring-On April 8, 2010:
Morning Bell: Obama’s False START-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 8, 2010:
Missile Defense Issue Remains A Sticking Point in U.S.-Russia Arms-Reduction Pact-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough, International Writer-On April 7, 2010:
Obama will Shy Away from Nuclear Crisis with Israel’-Posted on IsraelNationalNews.com-By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu-On April 7, 2010:
Obama Weakens America-Posted on GlennBeck.com-By Glenn Beck-On April 6, 2010:
Morning Bell: The Road to a New Nuclear Arms Race-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On April 6, 2010:
Obama calls nuclear strategy ‘significant step’-Posted on Chron.com-By ROBERT BURNS and DESMOND BUTLER, Associated Press Writers-On April 6, 2010:
Despite U.S. Push for Sanctions, Iran Is Missing From U.N. Security Council’s April Agenda-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Patrick Goodenough-On April 6, 2010:
Lieberman: Iran Bomb ‘Turning Point in History’-Posted on NewsMax.com-On April 4, 2010:
A DUMB POLICY ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS: DOES IT MATTER?-Posted on PowerLineBlog.com-On April 5, 2010:
The New York Times and Missile Defense-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 25, 2010:
Missile Defense Is What Really Matters-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 23, 2010:
Obama’s Weak Missile Defense Nominee-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On March 12, 2010:
The Increasing Ballistic Missile Threat-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On February 8, 2010:
Missile Defense to be Tested, but Questions About U.S. Security Remain-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On January 19, 2010:
Obama Popular in Europe, but He’s Not Doing Much for U.S. Interests Abroad-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On January 19, 2010:
Video: Ex CIA Ray McGovern on Obama’s policy towards Russia!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TheRealNews-On December 14, 2008:
Note: These articles and/or blog posts relate to and/or support my blog posts-You Decide:
National Security Shouldn’t Be For Sale!
Nuclear Summit Part of Obama Administration’s ‘Fantasy Foreign Policy’!
Is Pelosi Wrong On Defense Spending?
Analysis: NKorea’s Bomb Test Adds To Atomic Threat!
The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!
33 Minutes-Protecting America During New Missile Age:
Ongoing Concerns With This President and His Administration!
Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!
Does Our President Hate America?
Where Is America Today?
Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!
Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!
A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer:
“Food For Thought”
“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”