Swine Flu — One of the Most Massive Cover-ups in American History!

QUESTION: What do we really know about the supposedly evolving “pandemic” of H1N1 influenza beginning with the original discovery of the infection in Mexico in March of this year and the H1N1 influenza vaccines that will likely cause Gullian Barre paralysis, seizures, behavioral problems and neuro-developmental disorders in children within months after being vaccinated?

The following eye-opening study conducted by Dr. Russell Blaylock, a board certified neurosurgeon (www.russellblaylockmd.com), who utilized high-quality, peer-reviewed journals, data from the CDC and accepted textbooks of virology as his sources to prove that we are witnessing one of the most massive cover-ups in American history-You Decide:

Swine Flu — One of the Most Massive Cover-ups in American History- Posted by: Dr. Mercola-On November 03 2009:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx

These are pertinent excerpts from this study:

“What experience and history teach is this—that people and governments never have learned anything from history or acted on principles deduced from it.” G.W.F. Hegel

I have been following the evolving “pandemic” of H1N1 influenza beginning with the original discovery of the infection in Mexico in March of this year. In the course of this study I have tried to utilize as my sources high-quality, peer-reviewed journals, data from the CDC and accepted textbooks of virology.

As with all such studies one has to integrate and correlate previous experiences with epidemics and pandemics. As you will see, a great deal of my material comes from official sources, such as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the New England Journal of Medicine. Thus my distracters cannot claim that I am using material that is not within the mainstream.

Pregnant Women NOT at Special Risk from Swine Flu:

In the beginning, even before it was declared a level 6 pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), a group of “scientists” were sounding the alarm that this might indeed be the terrifying, deadly pandemic they had been expecting for over half a century.

Naturally, the vaccine manufacturers were doing all they could to fuel this fear and they were quietly making deals with WHO to be among the companies selected to manufacture the “pandemic” vaccine for the world. Being anointed by WHO would guarantee tens of billions in profits.

As the infection began to spread into the United States and then the rest of the world, its peculiar nature became obvious. Those born before 1950 seem to have a high degree of resistance to the infection and the disease seems slightly more pathogenic (disease causing) among those aged 25 to 49. Early on the official sources declared that pregnant women were at a special risk as compared to the seasonal flu.¹ As we shall see later, this was a grand lie.

Initial Studies Show H1N1 NOT Dangerous or Highly Contagious:

Once the pandemic had been declared, virologists tested the potency of this virus using a conventional method, that is, infecting ferrets with the virus.² What they found was that the H1N1 virus was no more pathogenic than the ordinary seasonal flu, even though it did penetrate slightly deeper into the lungs. It in no way matched the pathogenecity of the 1917-1918 H1N1 virus. It also did not infect other tissues, and especially important, it did not infect the brain.

Next, they wanted to test the ability of the virus to spread among the population. The results of their tests were conflicting, but the best evidence indicated that the virus did not spread to others very well. In fact, an unpublished study by the CDC found that when one member of a family contracted the H1N1 virus, other members of the family were infected only 10% of the time—a very low communicability.

This was later confirmed in a study of the experience of New York State, in which only 6.9% of the population contracted the virus, far below the 50% predicted by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.³ It is instructive to note that during the 1917-18 Swine flu epidemic the world infection rate was only 20%.⁴

They also predicted that 1.8 million people would need hospitalization and 300,000 would end up in the intensive care units (ICU). Further, they predicted that hospitals would be overwhelmed and that ICU units would not have enough beds to care for the sick and dying. Incredibly, they predicted that 90,000 people would die.

Much Fear Mongering:

Not satisfied, they up the ante on fear mongering by peddling the idea that pregnant women were especially in danger as were small children. We were told daily that young, healthy people were dying, not just those with underlying medical conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, cancer and other immune suppressive diseases. The Minister of Fear (the CDC) was working overtime peddling doom and gloom, knowing that frightened people do not make rational decisions—nothing sells vaccines like panic.

These same dire predictions were extended to Australia and New Zealand, which began to show an increase in their reported cases of H1N1 and associated hospitalizations as they entered their fall and winter. Recently, two major articles were released in the New England Journal of Medicine, which analyzed the American hospitalization experience⁵ and the Australian/New Zealand ICU experience⁶. I will analyze these very interesting studies.

There is a dramatic disconnect between what the science is discovering about this flu virus and what is being broadcast over the media outlets. As you will see, this is a very mild flu virus infection for 99.9% of the population.

Australian and New Zealand Experience Prove U.S. is Wrong:

As I stated, the countries in the southern hemisphere have already gone through their fall and winter, that is the seasons of peak flu infections. Epidemiologists and virologists have been surprised at how mild this flu pandemic has been in the Southern Hemisphere, with relatively few deaths and few hospitalizations in most areas.

The study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine on October 8, 2009, called the AZIC study, analyzed all ICU admissions in New Zealand and Australia, looking at a number of factors.⁶ Here is what they found.

ICU Hospitalizations:

Out of a population of 25 million people, 722 were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a confirmed diagnosis of H1N1 influenza. Overall, 856 people were admitted with a flu virus, but 11.3% were a type A flu that was not subtyped and 4.3% were seasonal flu.

They also analyzed the number of people admitted with viral pneumonia and found the following:

Number of People Admitted to the Hospital each Year with Viral Pneumonia⁵

57 people in 2005

33 people in 2006

69 people in 2007

69 people in 2008

37 people in 2009

So we see that in 2009 they had 32 fewer people admitted with actual viral pneumonia. The CDC and other public health agents of fear like to imply that mass numbers of people are dying from “flu”, that is, actual influenza viral pneumonia, when in fact, most are dying from other complications secondary to underlying health problems—either diagnosed or undiagnosed.

They also found that the average person’s risk of ending up in the ICU was one in 35,714 or about three thousandths of one percent (0.00285%), an incredibly low risk. When they looked at actual admission to the ICU, they found that it was people aged 25 to 49 who made up the largest number admitted. Infants from birth to age 1 year had the higher admission per population, and had a high mortality rate.

Majority of Children Respond POORLY to Flu Vaccine:

It is interesting to note that babies this age respond poorly to either the seasonal flu vaccine or the H1N1 vaccine. One of the largest studies ever done, found that children below the age of 2 years received no protection at all from the seasonal flu vaccine.⁷

The recently completed study on the effectiveness of the new H1N1 vaccine reported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease found that 75% of small children below age 35 months received no protection from the H1N1 vaccine and that 65% of children between the ages of 3 years and 9 years received no protection from the vaccine.⁸

Flu Vaccine DOUBLES Risk of Getting H1N1:

It is also important to view this in the face of the new unpublished Canadian study of 12 million people that found getting the seasonal flu vaccine, as recommended by the CDC and NIH, doubles one’s risk of developing the H1N1 infection. It would also make the infection much more serious. So much for expert advice from the government.

Obese at Six Times Higher Risk from H1N1 Complications:

As stated, most authorities agree that the H1N1 variant virus is quite mild as far as flu viruses go. The vast majority of people (99.99%) are having very brief and mild illnesses from this virus.

Keep in mind that when I am discussing numbers and risk, this does not intend to understate the devastation experienced by the people who are experiencing serious illness or even death.

Any death is a tragedy.

What we are discussing here is—is the risk from this virus significant enough to justify draconian measures by the government and medical community? Should we implement mass vaccinations with a vaccine that is essentially an experimental vaccine, poorly tested and of questionable benefit?

The study also looked at the health risk of the people admitted to the ICU, but unfortunately did not look at the underlying health problems of those who died. We get a hint, since the American study did note that it was those over age 65 who were most likely to die, and that 100% of these individual had underlying health problems before they were infected.

One of the real surprises from this study, and the American study, was that one of the more powerful risk factors for being admitted to the ICU and of dying was obesity. Obese people are admitted 6x more often than those of normal weight. As we shall see, obesity played a significant role in the risk to children and pregnant women as well, something that has never been discussed by the media, the CDC or the public health officials.

This study found that 32.7% of those admitted to the ICU had asthma or other chronic pulmonary disease, far higher than the general population. The Australian and New Zealand study also had a large number of aboriginal patients and those from the Torres Strait. It is known that nutrient deficiencies are common in both populations, which means an impaired immune system.

Obesity is associated with a high incidence of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, both of which would increase one’s risk of having a serious infection, even to viruses that are mildly pathogenic. (mild viruses).

H1N1 Vaccine is NOT Made the Same as Regular Flu Vaccine!!

I am really upset at the insistence by the CDC, medical doctors and the media that all pregnant women should be vaccinated by this experimental vaccine. The media repeats the manufacturers’ mantra that this vaccine is produced exactly like the seasonal flu, when in fact it is not. Yes, they use chicken eggs, but the rest has been fast tracked and many shortcuts on safety procedures have been allowed.

There are 250,000 pregnant women in Australia and New Zealand combined. Only 66 pregnant women were admitted to the ICU, an incidence of 1 pregnant woman per 3,800 pregnant women or a risk of .03%.⁶ Put another way, a pregnant woman in these two countries can feel comfortable to know that there is a 99.97% chance that she will not get sick enough to end up in the ICU.

Pregnant Women NOT at Increased Risk, Obese Women Are!!

So, why did even 66 pregnant women end up in the ICU? As we shall see in the American study⁵, a significant number of these pregnant women were either obese or morbidly obese and most had underlying medical problems. The Australian/New Zealand study⁶ found that one of the major risk factors for pregnant women was indeed being obese and that obesity was associated with a high risk of underlying medical disorders.

They also found that death from H1N1 infection correlated best with increasing age, contrary to what the media says. They concluded the study with the following statement:

“ The proportion of patients who died in the hospital in our study is no higher than that previously reported among patients with seasonal influenza A who were admitted to the ICU.” ⁶

In fact, they report that of those infected with the H1N1 variant virus who were sick enough to be admitted to the ICU, 84.5 % went home and 14.3% died and that of those admitted with seasonal flu 72.9% were discharged and 16.2% died. That is, more died from the seasonal flu.

Recent NEJM Study of the American Experience:

In the same Oct, 8^th issue of the New England Journal of Medicine they reported on the American experience with the H1N1 variant virus.⁵ The study looked at data from 24 states with widespread influenza infection from April through June 2009. Remember, unlike most flu epidemics in the United States, this epidemic began early and by the end of September it was beginning to peak, with late October being the date it may begin to decline.

The study examined 13,217 cases of infection involving 1082 people who were hospitalized. Here is what they found:

Underlying Medical Conditions:

Of the total hospitalized patients:

60% of children had underlying medical conditions

83% of adults had underlying medical conditions

They also found that 32% of patients had at least 2 medical conditions that would put them at risk. We are constantly told that it is the young adult aged 25 to 49 who is at the greatest risk. Note that 83% of these people had underlying medical conditions. This means that in truth only 292 “healthy” people out of 1082 in 24 states were sick enough to enter the hospital—that is 292 healthy people out of tens of millions of people, not much of a risk if you do not have an underlying chronic medical problem.

Underlying Medical Conditions Risk Factor for H1N1 Deaths:

When they looked at people over age 65 years of age, that is, the folks who are most likely to die in the hospital, 100% had underlying medical conditions—all of them. So, there was not one healthy person over age 65 who has died out of 24 states combined.

What about the children, a special target of the fear mongering media and government agencies? This study found that 60% had underlying medical conditions and that 30% were either obese or morbidly obese. 

A previous CDC study states that 2/3 of children who died had neurological disorders or respiratory diseases such as asthma.³ If we take the 60% figure, that means out of the 84 children reported to have died by October 24^th, 2009, only 34 children considered healthy in a nation of 301 million people really died, not 84. It is also instructive to note that according to CDC figures, the seasonal flu last year killed 116 children.⁹

Remember, that is, 34 so-called healthy children out of a nation of 40 million children. In 2003 it was reported by the CDC that 90 children died from seasonal flu complications. Ironically, as shown by Neil Z. Miller in his excellent book—Vaccine Safety Manuel—once the flu vaccine was given to small children the death rate from flu increased 7-fold.¹⁰ Not surprising, since the mercury in the vaccine suppresses immunity.

Pediatric Flu Deaths by Year Made WORSE by Flu Vaccine:

1999 — – 29 deaths

2000 — – 19 deaths

2001 — – 13 deaths

2002 — – 12 deaths

2003 — – 90 deaths (Year of mass vaccinations of children under age 5 years)

2006 — 78 deaths

2007 — – 88 deaths

2008 – 116 deaths (40.9% vaccinated at age 6 months to 23 months)¹¹

Parents should also keep in mind that this study, as well as the Australian/New Zealand Study found that childhood obesity played a major role in a child’s risk of being admitted to the ICU or dying. This is another dramatic demonstration as to the danger of obesity in children and that all parents should avoid MSG (all food-based excitotoxin additives), excess sugar and excess high glycemic carbohydrates in their children’s diets. This goes for pregnant moms as well.

Every Parent Needs to Know Other Vaccines INCREASE Risk of H1N1:

One major factor being left out of all discussion of these vaccines, especially those for small children and babies, is the effect of other vaccinations on presently circulating viral infections such as the H1N1 variant virus. It is known that several of the vaccines are powerfully immune suppressing. For example, the measles, mumps and rubella virus are all immune suppressing, as seen with the MMR vaccine, a live virus vaccine.^{12, 13}

This means that when a child receives the MMR vaccine, for about two to five weeks afterwards their immune system is suppressed, making them highly susceptible to catching viruses and bacterial infections circulating through the population. Very few mothers are ever told this, even though it is well accepted in the medical literature.

In fact, it is known that the Hib vaccine for haemophilus influenzae is an immune suppressing vaccine and that vaccinated children are at a higher risk of developing haemophilus influenzae meningitis for at least one week after receiving the vaccine.^10,14 These small children receive both of these vaccines.

According to the vaccine schedule recommended by the CDC and used by most states, a child will receive their MMR vaccine and Hib vaccine at one year of age and both are immune suppressing. 

At age 2 to 4 months, they will receive a Hib vaccine. Therefore at age 2 to 4 months, and again at age one year, they are at an extreme risk of serious infectious complications caused by vaccine-induced immune suppression. The New Zealand/Australian study found that the highest death in the young was from birth to age 12 months, the very time they were getting these immune-suppressing vaccines.⁶

The so-called healthy children and babies that have ended up in the hospital and have died may in fact be the victims of immune suppression caused by their routine childhood vaccines. We may never know because the medical elite will never record such data or conduct the necessary studies. Recall also that the seasonal flu vaccine, which is recommended for all children over the age of 6 months, each year, is also immune suppressing because of the mercury-containing thimerosal in the vaccine.¹⁵ Infants under the age of 3 receive mercury-free seasonal flu vaccines, but any child over the age of 3 will receive the mercury-containing flu vaccine year after year. (Each dose of seasonal flu vaccine typically containing 25 mcg of mercury.)

If parents allow their children to be vaccinated according to the CDC recommendations, that is 2 seasonal flu vaccines and 2 swine flu vaccines as well as a pneumococcal vaccine, that will increase the number of vaccines a child will have by age 6 years to 41. This amounts to an enormous amount of aluminum and mercury as well as intense brain inflammation triggered by vaccine-induced microglial activation.¹⁶

Risk of Serious Illness from the H1N1 Mutant Virus:

Their survey of 24 states found that a total of 67 patients out of tens of millions of people ended up in the ICU. That is, only 6% of the people admitted to the hospital were so sick as to need intensive treatments. Of these 67 patients, 19 died (25%) and of these 67% had obvious underlying long-term medical illnesses. This means that only 6 patients out of tens of millions of people in 24 states that were considered “healthy” before their infection, had died. Is this justification for a mass vaccination campaign?

Of the 1082 hospitalized patients, 93% were eventually discharged recovered and only 7% died, a very low death rate. Their analysis of these cases concluded that those who died fell in three categories:

They were older patients

Antiviral medications were started 48 hours after the onset of the illness

There was no correlation to having had seasonal vaccines

The last item is especially interesting because they assume that having had seasonal flu vaccine would have offered some protection—it offered none.

What they did find was that none who died had been given antiviral medications (Tamiflu or Relenza) within 48 hours of getting sick. Those given the antiviral medications within the golden 48-hour period rarely died. Relenza is far safer than Tamiflu. This was the only factor found to correlate with survival of severely ill ICU patients.

What about the Danger to Pregnant Women? The American Experience:

Our media is inundating the public with scare stories of the danger this virus poses to pregnant women. Most of us visualize the pregnant woman as being healthy, young and without underlying medical diseases. The study is quite revealing, but omits some very important factors.

We are told that pregnant women are 6x more likely to end up in the hospital than the general population. This figure is derived from the fact that it was estimated that pregnant women had a 7% greater chance of requiring hospital admission than did the general public at 1% (Even this is a far higher number than their own studies indicate—actually it is a very small fraction of 1%).

Dr. Michael Bronze, a professor of internal medicine at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, writing for emedicine medscape.com (WebMD), states that the risk of a pregnant women being hospitalized with the H1N1 infection is 0.32 per 100,000 pregnant women (which is 1 in 300,000 pregnant women).¹⁷ One can safely say, based on the Australian/New Zealand experience (at the peak of their flu season) and the American data somewhere in the middle of their flu season, that pregnant women have about a 99.97% chance they will not become so sick as to require hospital care at any level.

The death rate of pregnant women who were admitted to the ICU was 7.7%, a fairly low figure for infectious ICU patients. Remember, most patients admitted to the hospital are admitted for hydration and are not that ill in terms of the infection itself.

Smoking and Obesity Increase Risk of H1N!

Now, most of us assume that these pregnant women are perfectly healthy as mentioned above, but the data shows something quite different. They found that greater than 30% of the pregnant women were either obese or morbidly obese, as did the Australian/New Zealand study. Of these, 60% had underlying medical conditions that put them at greater risk of overwhelming infections—both viral and bacterial.

It is unfortunate that they did not enter any information on smoking, either by the mother or by anyone living in the household. It is known that smoking greatly increases ones risk of severe complications from any flu virus.^18,19 This is for several reasons. One, smokers eat a much poorer diet than non-smokers.

Second, smoking destroys the cilia in the bronchial passageways that are essential for clearing mucus and debris—thus increasing the risk of developing pneumonia.²⁰ Finally, nicotine is a very powerful immune suppressant.²¹ The combined effect of all three is enough to land anyone in the ICU during even a mild flu season. Likewise, chronic smokers have low magnesium levels, which increase their risk of developing bronchiospasm that is resistant to normal drug treatments.^22-24

They also failed to record possible illegal drug use, how many were living at poverty levels and how many were on prescription drugs known to suppress immunity or deplete nutrients essential for immune function. And, one must keep in mind, at this age, (age range of 15 to 39 years) many would have had numerous childhood vaccines and booster vaccines. 

This was also not considered for obvious reasons. So, some critical information we all need to evaluate this “pandemic” is being excluded or purposely kept from us.

Bacterial Pneumonia and Swine Flu:

The American study found that of the people admitted to the hospital, 40% were found to have X-ray evidence of pneumonia. Of these, 66% had pre-existing medical conditions, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), immunosuppression for transplants or cancer or neurologic disorder.

We are not told how many were smokers or lived with smokers, again, something that puts people at great risk of having severe reactions to any infection. Smokers have much higher bacterial pneumonia rates every year. The CDC estimates that smokers have a 200% increased risk of flu virus complications as compared to nonsmokers.

The CDC released in the September 29 issue of the MMWR an analysis of the lung tissue from 77 fatal cases of H1N1 infection.²⁵ Of these, 29% had a secondary bacterial infection—pneumonia. This is an important study because the media and the CDC are telling adults they need to get a pneumococcal vaccine and that parents need to have their children vaccinated with the pneumococcal vaccine as well.

This adult study found that only half of the pneumonias were due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, the organism used in the vaccine. Half of the cases were due to other strains of streptococcus, staphlococcus or H. Influenza. Some 18% of the people had multiple organism cultured from their lungs.

It is important to note that they found that all of these autopsied patients had previous, serious medical problems prior to becoming infected with H1N1 variant and that not all bacteria were examined, meaning that even those with Strep pneumoniae could have had multiple infections, for which the vaccines would have offered no protection.

Parents should also know that the vast majority of pneumonias found in these infected children were not due to Strep pneumoniae, but rather Staph aureus. Again, the pneumococcal vaccine would have offered these children no protection.

Pregnant Women Given Vaccine Have Babies with More Health Problems:

It has always been a principle of medicine that one should not vaccinate pregnant women, except in extreme cases, because the risk to the baby is too high. Recently, we have seen two examples of violation of this policy. When the HPV vaccine Gardasil was first released the CDC and the manufacturer (Merck Pharmaceutical Company) recommended that it be given to pregnant women.

Shortly after beginning this dangerous practice it was ordered halted because a number of women were losing their babies and babies were being born with major malformations.²⁶

It is known that stimulating a woman’s immune system during midterm and later term pregnancy significantly increases the risk that her baby will develop autism during childhood and schizophrenia sometime during the teenage years and afterward.²⁷

Compelling scientific evidence also shows an increased risk of seizures in the baby and later as an adult.²⁸ In fact, a number of neurodevelopmental and behavioral problems can occur in babies born to women immunologically stimulated during pregnancy.^29-32

It is true that serious flu infections or E. coli infections during pregnancy are a major risk for all these complications, but a woman’s risk of becoming infected, as we have seen, is a very small fraction of 1 %, yet they are calling for all pregnant women to be vaccinated with at least three vaccines, two of which contain mercury. There is also evidence to show that a large number of these women will gain no protection from the vaccine.

Dr. Bronze, quoted above, notes that animal studies have shown that vaccines harm unborn babies and that no safety studies have been done in humans. A recent study done by Dr. Laura Hewitson, a professor of obstetrics at the University of Pittsburg Medical Center, found that a single vaccine used in human babies, when used in newborn monkeys, caused significant abnormalities in brainstem development.³³ This mass vaccination program for H1N1 variant virus will be the largest experiment on pregnant women in history and could end as a monumental disaster.

How Many Cases are Really Swine Flu?

CBS, to their credit, conducted a three-month long investigation that indicates that we have all been hoodwinked by the governmental “protection” agency called euphemistically, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.³⁴

What they tried to learn from the CDC was just what percentage of the “flu cases” were in fact H1N1. The CDC did all they could to protect this information and only after filing a Freedom of Information request and waiting 2 months did they finally release the data. Now we know why they wanted it protected and why they stopped testing for the H1N1 virus in late July.

The data revealed that in fact very few cases reported as swine flu were in fact H1N1 variant virus. CBS examined the data in all 50 states. What they found, for example, was that in Georgia only 2% of reported cases were H1N1 (97% negative for H1N1); in Alaska only 1% of reported cases were H1N1 (93% negative for flu and 5% seasonal flu) and in California only 2% of reported cases were H1N1 with 12% being other flu viruses and 86% negative for flu.

A recent release from the CDC found that their survey reported that of 12,943 specimens tested from around the country, only 26.3% of cases tested positive for H1N1 variant virus, but that 99.8% of the specimens tested positive for some type of other flu virus, most of which were regular seasonal flu.

The CDC has now changed all data reporting on the flu effects. They did this by stopping viral typing and subtyping and rolled back all previous numbers based on prior data. The new system for collecting data now started on August 30^th, 2009.

The only reason I can imagine they did this is that the prior data was clearly demonstrating that the H1N1 variant virus was causing a very mild illness in most people (99.99%) with fewer hospitalizations, fewer cases of pneumonia and fewer deaths for all ages and groups than the prior seasonal flu in past years. This was true for the United States and the Southern Hemisphere, which has gone though the worst of its flu season.

Now that they are no longer typing the virus, they can attribute all cases of pneumonia, hospitalizations and deaths to H1N1, even though the majority of cases appear to be from a long list of other causes. In fact, they can classify many cases of primary pneumonia as caused by H1N1.

Actually LESS Flu Deaths this Year:

One must always keep in mind that the CDC has told us that 36,000 people die every year from influenza and influenza-related complications. Thus far, we have seen (accepting their data) about 900 deaths and 21,829 cases of pneumonia.

This is far below the 36,000 figure. In fact, perhaps we should be breathing a sigh of relief that 35,000 fewer people have died this year from flu-related disorders. This would go down on record as the fewest flu-related deaths in recorded history. 

In fact, worldwide, according to CDC and WHO data, far fewer people have died form H1N1 than any seasonal flu in the past. This graph from the CDC showing the “Pneumonia and Influenza Mortality for 122 US Cities” also show that, so far, this year’s flu mortality is far below that of 2008.

In fact, worldwide, according to CDC and WHO data, far fewer people have died form H1N1 than any seasonal flu in the past. So, one must ask, why is the government and their handmaidens, the media, fueling this panic mentality? Why are we once again talking about mandatory vaccination for every man woman and child in the nation?

And I can assure you that soon we will hear an announcement that the adjuvant MF-59 or ASO3 (squalene) will be needed to save lives.

Now, if the CBS data forced from the files of the CDC is correct, why are so many people dying from this flu? The answer is that no greater number are dying now, for any age group, sex or state of pregnancy than have died in any previous flu outbreak.

By statistical slight of hand they have created this pandemic and continue to do so. One cannot foretell the future, but based on the data now available from the United States, Canada, Europe and the Southern hemisphere, there is no justification for the fear mongering by the media and government agencies.

It is accepted that the cognitive portions of the human brain work less well under two conditions—fear and anger. Those who have survived deadly situations or who make their living surviving such situations tell us that controlling our fear is the most important thing in survival. More people have died from making poor decisions while overwhelmed by fear than have died as a result of the situation itself.

I am reminded of the poor elderly person who died several years back waiting in a very long line for a flu vaccine in the sweltering heat. It seems she passed out and struck her head on the hard asphalt.

She was standing in that line for hours because the CDC announced that that year’s flu was going to be especially deadly for the elderly and there was a shortage of vaccine. As it turned out, that year they picked the wrong virus to make the vaccine—so it was not only a dangerous vaccine, it would have given her no protection. But then, the vaccine manufactures got their blood money.

What Do They Not Know About This Vaccine?

Insurance companies in Australia would not insure doctors who gave the vaccine because it was a fast tracked vaccine and therefore experimental. They felt that the danger of complications was far too high to risk insuring the doctors. Unlike doctors in America, they did not have a special law that Congress would pass to insulate them from liability should severe complications arise from the vaccine.

It is also of special interest to note that tens of millions of babies were vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine (providing no protection to the babies) only to learn later that it is linked to a 310% increased risk of developing multiple sclerosis.³⁶ One has to ask—What else do they not know about this vaccine?

Well, it turns out a lot.

Years after it was added to the recommended vaccine schedule, it was linked to a terrifying disorder called macrophagic myofascitis, which in children is associated with a severe dementia-like illness.

Then we have the case of the Gardasil vaccine. Millions of young girls were vaccinated and within several months pregnant women were losing their babies, babies were being born deformed, several of these very young girls died and a growing number have had serious reactions to the vaccine. Once again we have to ask—What else do they not know about this vaccine?

Vaccine Safety Testing Only Done for ONE Week:

Now we are being told that this new fast tracked, poorly tested vaccine is very safe and effective. The results of the testing on this vaccine were reported in the New England Journal of Medicine.³⁹ It is instructive to learn that the tests for safety and to assess complications lasted only 7 days after the vaccine, an incredibly short period of follow-up. Gullian Barre paralysis can occur even months after a vaccine as can seizures, behavioral problems and neurodevelopmental disorders in children.

It is interesting to note that the authors of the safety study for our swine flu vaccine were all employees of the maker of the vaccine CSL Biotherapeutics and eight held equity interest in the company.³⁹ This admission is part of the disclosure policy of the New England Journal of Medicine.

It is always important to keep in mind when you hear about this vaccine being safe and produced just like the seasonal flu vaccine—What else do they not know about this vaccine that they will discover months, years or even decades later. Once injected with the vaccine and you develop a complication there will be little that can be done to treat the life-long degenerative disorder it produces. You will just be a sad story on 60 minutes.

About Dr. Russell Blaylock:

Dr. Blaylock is a board certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer. For the past 25 years he has practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice. He recently retired from both practices to devote full time to nutritional studies and research.

Dr. Blaylock has written and illustrated three books. The first book was on the subject of excitotoxins, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills,and how they are related to diseases of the nervous system.

His second book, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life, covers the common basis of all diseases, nutritional protection against diseases of aging, protection against heavy metal toxicity, the fluoride debate, pesticide and herbicide toxicity, excitotoxin update, the vaccine controversy, protection against heart attacks and strokes.

His third book, Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients, was released in April, 2003 and discusses the ways to defeat cancer, enhance the effectiveness of conventional treatments and prevent complications associated with these treatments.

In addition, he has written and illustrated three chapters in medical textbooks, written a booklet on nutritional protection against biological terrorism and written and illustrated a booklet on multiple sclerosis. He has written over 30 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals on a number of subjects.

Since the publication of his first book he has been a guest on numerous national and international syndicated radio programs.”

Note: The following blog post seems to relate to this issue-You Decide:

THE STRANGE CASE OF JOSEPH MOSHE:

http://pimpinturtle.com/2009/08/21/the-strange-case-of-joseph-moshe.aspx

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

The Vatican’s Quest for a World Political Authority!

Question: Could it be true that the Vatican is supporting a New World Order?

The following report explains how the Roman Catholic Church has taken a prominent role in the unfolding plan to establish a world government. Researcher Carl Teichrib examines how and why-You Decide:

Sowing the Seeds of Global Government: “The Vatican’s Quest for a World Political Authority”:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/sowing_seeds_glbl_Gvrnmnt.pdf

The following are pertinent excerpts from this report:

“This report, Sowing the Seeds of Global Government: The Vatican’s Quest for a World Political Authority, explains how the Roman Catholic Church has taken a prominent role in the unfolding plan to establish a world government.

Researcher Carl Teichrib examines how and why:

• The Vatican is fully engaged in what former Vaticaninsider and author Malachi Martin described in his book The Keys of This Blood as a battle for control over an emerging world government.

• Pope Benedict, the leader of 1.2 billion Catholics, endorsed a “World Political Authority,” a form of world government, in his recent encyclical “Caritas in Veritate.”

• This world authority, in the Vatican view, is supposed to “manage the economy,” bring about “timely disarmament,” and ensure “food security and peace.”

• In practice, the Vatican plan means expanding the power and authority of such global institutions as the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the World Trade Organization.

• Despite the hope that “subsidiarity” or local control can be incorporated into this emerging world system, a possible or even likely result is global tyranny.

Introduction-By Carl Teichrib:

“Most of us are not competitors… We are the stakes. For the competition is about who will establish the first one-world system of government… No one can be exempted from its effects. No sector of our lives will remain untouched.”i – Malachi Martin.

In 1990, a former Vatican-insider claimed that a titanic struggle was being waged to bring about a world political system. This contest, the now deceased Jesuit explained, was primarily between three players: international Leninism, transnational business elites, and the hand of the Vatican.

Almost twenty years have passed since Malachi Martin drew attention to this three-way quest. At the time his assertions seemed over-the-top. Granted, the idea of a world government via communism wasn’t new as decades of Cold War posturing still played in our minds. And the writing was on the wall in respect to the growing power of international corporate and financial elites, exemplified by the likes of David Rockefeller and the Trilateral Commission.

But the Vatican?

For many, the belief that the Holy See was pursing a vision of world government was simply too much. After all, this ancient hub of Roman Catholicism had a reputation – especially among Europe’s agnostic youth – as an institution of old men, steeped in tradition, procession and ceremony. Never mind that the history of the Continent, more often than not, revolved around the Vatican’s political prowess.

In the summer of 2009, the Holy See’s political cards were revealed in a major papal document. Harkening back to Malachi Martin’s talk of

world government, the most powerful religious office on the planet had promoted a world political authority to manage the global economy. Food security, disarmament, and peace would follow suit.

A sound global economy and world peace are noble sounding goals, to be sure. But the danger lurks in that the seeds of tyranny are often buried in the soil of good intentions.

On July 7th, Pope Benedict released his new encyclical titled Caritas in Veritate, or “Charity in Truth.” Two years in the making, this document was disclosed on the eve of the G8 Summit in Italy and the Pope’s meeting with US President Barack Obama. Some 30,000 words long, this encyclical outlined the Pope’s concerns regarding globalization and economics, corporate ethics, and the role of the Catholic Church in promoting social doctrine.

Commenting on the encyclical, The New York Times noted that, “sometimes Benedict sounds like an old-school European socialist…”

And The San Francisco Chronicle explained that, “Caritas in Veritate addresses very modern issues such as globalization, market economy, hedge funds, outsourcing, and alternative energy, calling for people to put aside greed and let their consciences guide them in economic and environmental decisions. Many of the ideas put forward would likely rankle conservatives…”

E.J. Dionne, a columnist for The Washington Post, gushed that Benedict is “well to Obama’s left on economics.”

While Pope Benedict’s perspective on the global economy was a perplexing blend of free-market and social welfare ideals, what raised eyebrows were his thoughts on international politics. In section 67 of Caritas in Veritate, the Pope dropped an ideological bombshell – a world authority to “manage the economy,” bring about “timely disarmament,” and ensure “food security and peace.”

Here is a major part of section 67.

The reference to a “world political authority” is very clear, and Pope Benedict explains that this international agency should be given the power of enforcement… “real teeth.”

“In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is a strongly felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth. One also senses the urgent need to find innovative ways of implementing the principle of the responsibility to protect and of giving poorer nations an effective voice in shared decision making.

This seems necessary in order to arrive at a political, juridical and economic order which can increase and give direction to international cooperation for the development of all peoples in solidarity. To manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a true world political  authority, as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated some years ago. Such an authority would need to be regulated by law, to observe consistently the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity, to seek to establish the common good, and to make a commitment to securing authentic integral human development inspired by the values of charity in truth.

Furthermore, such an authority would need to be universally recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice, and respect for rights. Obviously it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international forums.”

Immediate controversy surrounded this paragraph, with some Catholics quickly attempting to distance the idea that the Holy See would support world government.

Hierarchy Of Power:

John-Henry Westen, writing for LifeSiteNews, stated unequivocally that the Pope was speaking “directly against a one-world government.” Westen’s justification for this position was the Pope’s call for a “dispersed political authority” in paragraph 41 – a reference to the role of States in the international system. Westen also brought up the use of the word “subsidiarity” in section 57 as a strike against world government.

This is an important point: Subsidiarity is the Catholic social teaching that issues should be dealt with at the lowest level possible. In many respects it builds on the theme of self-determination, and in this sense it would seem antithetical to a world authority.

Section 57 of Caritas in Veritate says,

“In order not to produce a dangerous universal power of a tyrannical nature, the governance of globalization must be marked by subsidiarity, articulated into several layers and involving different levels that can work together. Globalization certainly requires authority, insofar as it poses the problem of a global common good that needs to be pursued. This authority, however, must be organized in a subsidiary and stratified way, if it is not to infringe upon freedom and if it is to yield effective results in practice.”

Mr. Westen, who claims that Benedict’s use of subsidiarity opposes world government, has misdiagnosed this section. The Pope is not speaking against one-world government by evoking subsidiarity; instead he’s offering a hierarchical model upon which to build an international authority. Essentially, where issues can be dealt with at the local or national level, let them be handled in this domain. And where issues are global and cannot be adequately addressed at a lower level, then a world authority is necessary.

Pope Benedict also suggested that subsidiarity could be a safety value that checks the power of a universal government against taking on tyrannical traits. But to propose that subsidiarity is a counter to tyranny is unconvincing – it can’t even check the expansion of over-government today.

John Laughland, author of The Tainted Source: The Undemocratic Origins of the European Idea, noted that, “…the German constitution has become increasingly centralised as a result of its subsidiarity clause.”

The European Union also incorporates this concept, yet that hasn’t stopped the EU from centralizing political power and amassing a super-bloated bureaucracy.

Subsidiarity, according to Laughland, is a model that assumes a “unitarian, pyramidal hierarchy of executive functions” with a decidedly corporatist doctrine.

Subsidiarity can even be found in the UN system. Professor Robert Araujo explains that, “the principle of subsidiarity is recognized as a fundamental principle of the United Nations Organization.”

Here, the concept is centered on self-determination under article 1, paragraph 2 of the UN Charter. Yet this doesn’t stop the UN from seeking empowered international jurisdiction under the banner of “reform.”

It’s important to note that subsidiarity does allow for grassroots decision making and self-direction, but it’s within the context of a broader perspective.

Professor Araujo explains that it’s a “a concept synthesizing the interests of the individual with those of the community.”

Hence, it’s not difficult to see how this principle can align itself with a world authority – you can pursue local political direction, but where local involvement ends then other levels of government step up for the “common good.”

To say that Pope Benedict opposes world government because he evoked subsidiarity misses the point: subsidiarity plays a functioning role in a hierarchy of increasing political powers.

What paragraph 57 demonstrates is not an aversion to world government, but the order of decision-making Benedict believes it should be based upon.

Reform And World Authority:

Paragraph 67 of Caritas in Veritate is overtly political in nature.

Here’s a breakdown of some key points.

“Reform the United Nations” – UN reform centers on more than just “voting changes” or “transparency.” Rather, reform is connected to world taxation, a global enforcement component, and the creation of an international parliament. A small mountain of reports and documents that support this version of reform already exist, supported by the United Nations, national governments, and pro-UN groups such as the World Federalist Movement and the Club of Rome.

In fact, this platform of international taxation, enforcement, and a world parliament were major discussion points at the UN Millennium Forum –particularly during the sessions hosted by the working group on “Strengthening and Democratizing the United Nations.”

Cliff Kincaid, the President of America’s Survival, Inc. and editor of Accuracy in Media, noted the linkages between reform and global governance in section 67 of the papal text.

“…the ‘reform’ of the U.N. is designed to strengthen it. Hence, the U.N. is clearly destined, from the Vatican point of view, to become the World Political Authority.”

“Responsibility to protect” – Known as R2P, this is a world federalist ideal that would give the UN a mandate to intervene domestically when a nation commits human rights violations. It sounds good on the surface, but critics – and even some advocates – realize that such a mandate may open Pandora’s Box.

José E. Alvarez, President of the American Society of International Law, recognized this situation while addressing a conference on international law at The Hague in 2007. R2P, he suggested, could be used as a pretext to engage in all sorts of questionable, interventionist actions.

Nobody in their right mind wishes for any people group to experience genocide or gross injustices. R2P, however, is a seriously flawed concept that has the potential for grave abuses. From a world management perspective, the Right to Protect becomes the legal justification for a world political authority to act militarily. The danger lurks in that the seeds of tyranny are often buried in the soil of good intentions.

“To manage the global economy…” – This is already being discussed within the international community, and it’s looking like the new world financial order will be a top-down power structure that will greatly empower existing global institutions:

Bank for International Settlements – to become the global banking regulator. The BIS is fast setting itself up as the international banking manager, a body that will oversee the world’s banks and financial system, including the regulation of international capital. An entity of this kind would be equivalent to a banker’s “king of the hill.”

The Los Angeles Times wrote last year that, “…such a system would force countries to give up a measure of national sovereignty over banks operating within their borders. It also could lead to international bureaucrats trying to shape financial policy and possibly taking punitive action.”

International Monetary Fund – to become the world reserve currency bank. Under this scheme, the IMF would be charged with regulating a new global currency to be used in world trade, including the energy sector. Collaborating with the World Bank, the IMF would likewise use this new currency unit for international loans and debt obligations. National and regional currencies would still exist, at least for the interim, but values would react and adjust according to new global benchmarks.

World Trade Organization – becoming the global trade regulator. The WTO would establish the rules for the trading of goods and services via a globally organized set of standard, a process it’s currently working through. National trade policies would hereafter line up with accepted world practices. All of this is already happening, but there’s a further link between global free trade and a new international financial system. Richard Cooper, while advocating a single global reserve currency, noted the following in a 1984 conference sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, “It would be logical if free [world] trade accompanied this single currency regime. That would also be consistent with the collaborative political spirit that would be required to establish the single currency regime. Free trade would insure one market in goods as well as in financial instruments.”

United Nations – fast becoming the global ethics and governance agency. The UN would give moral input and political guidance to the newly managed world economy. In essence, this body would become the “planetary consciousness,” shaping consumer and political attitudes, values, and behaviors.

This too is already happening. At the end of June, the UN hosted a conference that outlined an accepted social norm for the global economy: an Earth-centric worldview, international socialism, and a New Age vision of planetary evolution.

Remember, Benedict’s world political authority is supposed to manage the global economy. How will the execution of this mandate happen? Will the world authority operate as an umbrella to the above-mentioned groups? Can the United Nations reform to the point of being this global economic manager?

Caritas in Veritate gave us a glimpse into the world authority’s directives, but it didn’t give operational specifics. Has the Holy See actually fleshed out the details: maybe outlining the process through an internal working document?

If so, it would be a very interesting read!  Or, in only offering generalities, does the Vatican expect other major players – such as the United Nations or World Federalist Movement – to hammer out the particulars?

If so, where does that place the Vatican in this world government framework? Observer? Advisor? Overseer?

A lot of perplexing questions arise, and so they should.

“An authority…regulated by law” – Governments the world over are regulated by internal laws and accountability measures, yet this doesn’t stop abuses, corruption, or even tyranny from entering the picture. The idea that a world authority could be kept in check by a system of world law doesn’t hold water.

“True world political authority” – This isn’t a moral or spiritual ideal propagated by the Holy See, but the vision of an actual world government. This is

evident in the overall context of section 67 and in the wording itself: a “world political authority.”

No doubt the papal office desires to see a spiritual standard incorporated into this political entity, based in large part on the social teachings of the Catholic Church. However, this in no way guarantees that a world authority will act in good will. As history bears out, the Vatican itself is far from immune in this regard, and “holders of power” tend to amass power.

Remember the words of Lord Acton, a Catholic historian who penned the following in response to the Vatican’s unquestioning authority: “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Following A Tradition:

Pope Benedict’s promotion of world government didn’t happen in a vacuum. Since the 1950s the Holy See has consistently moved to support an empowered United Nations and world political authority.

Pope Pius XII: On April 6, 1951, Pope Pius XII had a meeting in the Vatican with the World Movement for World Federal Government – a precursor to the World Federalist Movement. During that meeting, Pope Pius encouraged his “world government” audience to continue in this quest.

“Your movement, Gentlemen, has the task of creating an effective political organization of the world. There is nothing more in keeping with the traditional doctrines of the Church, or better adapted to her teachings on the rightful or unjust war, especially in the present world situation. An organization of this nature must, therefore, be set up…”

The Pope then explained, rightly so, that the “deadly germs of mechanical totalitarianism” might infect this “world political organization.”

However, in noting this possibility, he reminded the attendees to pursue a morally firm world federalist approach. Ending his meeting, the Pope encouraged his audience to pursue this grand idea.

“…you have the courage to give yourself to this cause. We congratulate you. We would express to you Our wishes for your entire success and with all Our heart We will pray to God to grant you His wisdom and help in the performance of your task.”

Pope John XXIII: In his 1963 encyclical, Pacem in Terris, Pope John XXIII called for an international public authority with a “world-wide sphere of activity” to deal with global problems. This authority would be “equipped with world-wide power and adequate means for achieving the universal common good,” although it could not establish itself through force: “it must be set up with the consent of all nations.”

In contemplating how this system would work, John XXIII called upon the principle of subsidiarity, saying that this should be applied “to the relations between the public authority of the world community and the public authorities of each political community.”

Subsidiarity here, like Benedict’s use of the term, doesn’t negate a world authority – it simply imposes a hierarchical structure that recognizes each level, from the bottom-to-the-top, as a key to the process.

Pope Paul VI:  While speaking at the United Nations in 1965, the adulation coming from the pope was palatable. During his talk he praised the UN system as “the obligatory path of modern civilization and world peace.”

“The edifice which you have constructed must never fall; it must be perfected, and made equal to the needs which world history will present. You mark a stage in the development of mankind, from which retreat must never be admitted… Advance always! …Let unanimous trust in this Institution grow, let its authority increase.”

Alas, Pope Paul VI called for a world government.

“Is there anyone who does not see the necessity of coming thus progressively to the establishment of a world authority, able to act efficaciously on the juridical and political levels?

Pope John Paul II: In his 1995 speech to the UN, John Paul reflected on the historical connections between the Vatican and the world body.

“The Holy See, in virtue of its specifically spiritual mission, which makes it concerned for the integral good of every human being, has supported the ideals and goals of the United Nations Organization from the very beginning. Although their respective purposes and operative approaches are obviously different, the Church and the United Nations constantly find wide areas of cooperation on the basis of their common concern for the human family.”

Although Pope John Paul II butted heads with the United Nations over family issues, he did place enormous importance on pursuing political systems of world law. In 1985 he spoke to judges at the International Court of Justice, telling them that, The Holy See attaches great importance to its collaboration with the United Nations Organization and the various organisms, which are a vital part of its work. The Church’s interest in the International Court of Justice goes back to the very beginnings of this Tribunal and to the events that were linked to its establishment….

The Church has consistently supported the development of an international administration of justice and arbitration as a way of peace fully resolving conflicts and as part of the evolution of a world legal system…

Strictly speaking, the present Court is no more – but it is also no less – than an initial step towards what we hope will one day be a totally effective judicial authority in a peaceful world. [italics in original]

In other speeches and writings, such as his encyclical Sollicitudo rei Socialis, John Paul called for a strengthening of world law and a “greater degree of international ordering.”

None of this has the same blatancy as Pope Benedict’s recommendation for a “world political authority,” but it does follow a common political theme enlarged and enhanced global governance.

Pope Benedict’s idea of a “world political authority” didn’t spring out of thin air. Rather, through successive papal offices stretching back to at least Pius XII, the Holy See has nurtured visions of an international politic.

Influencing Princes and Paupers:

The fact that a religious leader has called for a world authority is interesting in itself, but because this emanates from the papal office, an extra measure of attention is warranted.

We cannot overlook the influence wielded by the Holy See. The Pope

is vastly different in relation to other religious figures when it comes to global significance. It’s true that some Protestant and evangelical leaders are consulted by political elites; and government officials often court the heads of other religions, such as the Dalai Lama. But all of this pales to the historical and contemporary powers of the papal office.

For centuries the Holy See has been the centerpiece of European political affairs. Its history is replete with geo-political intrigues, papal wars, and the rise and fall of national powers. Royalty from every corner of the Continent have traveled to Rome seeking an audience with the Pope, hoping for papal favor.

Moreover, the Vatican has been a hub for banking interests, espionage, and transnational business dealings.  And today, just as in the past, Presidents and Prime Ministers bow before the Pope, seeking his counsel, and privately discussing matters of great political, economic, and social importance.

Eric Frattini, the author of The Entity: Five Centuries of Secret Vatican Espionage, gives us a window into this geo-political world.

“The papacy, the supreme authority at the head of the Catholic Church, is the oldest established institution in the world. It was the only institution to flourish during the Middle Ages, a leading actor in the Renaissance, and a protagonist in the battles of the Reformation, the Counter-Reformation, the French Revolution, the industrial era, and the rise and fall of communism. For centuries, making full use of their famous ‘infallibility,’ popes brought their centralized power to bear on the social outcomes of unfolding historical events…

…throughout history, the papacy has always displayed two faces:  that of the worldwide leadership of the Catholic Church and that of one of he planet’s best political organizations. While the popes were blessing their faithful on the one hand, on the other, they were receiving foreign ambassadors and heads of states and dispatching legates and nuncios on special missions.”

And standing behind the Pope is a worldwide following of devout Catholics, who may not agree with world government, but who are nevertheless committed to the Roman Catholic Church – thus supportive of the Pontiff.

Avro Manhattan, a critic of the Holy See, correctly made the correlation between the Vatican’s power and it’s faithful. “What gives the Vatican its tremendous power is not its diplomacy as such, but the fact that behind its diplomacy stands the Church, with all its manifold world-embracing activities…

…Vatican diplomacy is so influential and can exert such great power in the diplomatic-political field because it has at its disposal the tremendous machinery of a spiritual organization with ramifications in every country of the planet. In other words, the Vatican, as a political power, employs the Catholic Church as a religious institution to assist the attainment of its goals. These goals, in turn, are sought mainly to further the spiritual interests of the Catholic Church.

…the Catholic Hierarchy automatically reacts upon those innumerable religious, cultural, social, and finally political, organizations connected with the Catholic Church, which although tied to the Church primarily on religious grounds, can at given moments be made either directly or indirectly to serve political ends.”

The point is this:  No other religious leader on the planet holds such political and economic influence within a religious framework. Consider just the number of adherents that make up the backbone of the Church of Roman: In the US, Catholics make up approximately 22% of the populace, and of the world’s total, 17% – or about 1.14 billion people.xxvi That’s why Pope Benedict’s call for a “world political authority” is so significant; what he says influences leaders and laymen alike by the hundreds of millions.

If the local Baptist pastor or Mennonite preacher, with a flock of a few dozen or a few hundred, appealed for a UN-styled “world political authority” it wouldn’t mean much beyond the pews of that particular church. The congregants would either cheer the minister or, hopefully, challenge his assumptions. But generally speaking it wouldn’t cause a ripple beyond the local community.

However, when the “Holy Father” – a Catholic title that denotes more than just a “leader” – makes such a recommendation, and has the backing of earlier papal appeals, the waves of influence travel worldwide.

Conclusion:

–That the Holy See has, for at least six decades, supported the quest for a global political structure.

–That Pope Benedict has, through his recent encyclical, explicitly supported the idea of a world political authority; and that this world government should be designed to incorporate the principle of subsidiarity.

Further point: That subsidiarity in a universal political structure would be akin to the slogan, “think global, act local.”

–That the influence of the Holy See upon the international community is substantial, and that the Papacy has the backing and general support of hundreds of millions around the world, adding “local-to-global” support for the Vatican’s geo-political visions.

–That advocates for world government – such as the World Federalist Movement will pick up on Pope Benedict’s recommendations and use it to  parade the idea of world management.

–That many Roman Catholics and Catholic organizations will subsequently endorse the proposal for a world political authority, and hence support various movements for global governance.

–That individuals and organizations within and outside the Catholic Church will defend the Pope’s encyclical by seeking to spiritualize or moralize the text, thereby attempting to soften the controversy. Yet, the Pope’s intent for a world political authority remains.

–That a minority of Catholics will vocally oppose the Vatican’s call for UN empowerment and international government (many more will be indifferent).  Ridicule may occur for those who publically speak against Benedict’s political ideals. Expect rifts between those who oppose and those who advocate global governance.

–That non-Catholic faith groups will support Pope Benedict’s encyclical.  Already an evangelical response document has been issued by a group of professors and national evangelical leaders. Titled, Doing the Truth in Love, this text agrees that new forms of global authority are necessary, but that it “must secure increased participation, transparency and accountability, and help strengthen the nation state relative to the power of global finance.”

Such a view is more utopian than practical, as few real incentives would compel a world government to operate this openly.

–That new alliances and networks will be formed to increase political and social pressure in support of world management, and that these networks will incorporate Catholic/Vatican groups, non-governmental organizations, and elements from the United Nations.

When the Holy See raises the specter of world government it should jolt Catholics and non-Catholics alike. Even if a world political authority doesn’t come to fruition, such advocacy is stunning. Here we have the planet’s most influential religious office – itself politically structured as a top-down authority – promoting a top-down system of international management. The perception alone is deeply troubling.

And if a world political authority does come into play, what will keep it from morphing into an autocratic regime? Even in this we are assuming that the global authority will be introduced as a limited government. The ultimate contradiction, of course, is a toothless world authority. Without enforcement capabilities it would be little more than an advisory board. To be effective, therefore, it must be a centralist power with clout: Anything less would be meaningless.

But is this what the world needs to ensure global order?

Consider for a moment the last one hundred years, a century rife with examples of “well-meaning” centralist governments – they were always well meaning to somebody. In the name of “peace and security” these regimes crushed domestic opponents, often liquidating their own supporters in the process. From Chile to China the unofficial motto, “peace is the destruction of all opposition,” was translated into action. And in the case of Nazi Germany, the government rose to power through the democratic process. Sadly, in some cases the Vatican itself held the hands of those who perpetrated such crimes, as in Croatia during the 1940s.

Does all of this mean that the Holy See supports a dictatorial world regime? Not according to Pope Benedict’s encyclical, as he openly recognized the dangerous possibility of a “universal power of a tyrannical nature.” His hope, as outlined in Caritas in Veritate, is a world political authority checked by legal boundaries so as not to “infringe upon freedom.” Government overstep would be offset by accountability measures.

A fine concept in theory, but it rests on a shaky assumption: That the world political authority will remain content to live within prescribed limitations; satisfied to operate within tight social, economic, and political constraints. Here’s the snag: our advanced, democratic nations – and even the Vatican – haven’t and can’t live up to this basic standard.

While Pope Benedict tries to soft-sell Catholics and national leaders on the idea of world government, the sobering words of Lord Acton drift-in from a nearly forgotten past: “Power corrupts…”

Endnotes:

Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood (Touchstone, 1990), p.15.

The New York Times, “Pope Urges Forming New World Economic Order to Work for the ‘Common Good’,” July 8, 2009. Online edition.

David Ian Miller, “The Pope pays the economy some attention,” The San Francisco Chronicle, July 13, 2009. Online edition.

E.J. Dionne Jr. “To the Right of the Pope,” The Washington Post, July 8, 2009, online edition.

John-Henry Westen, “Pope’s New Encyclical Speaks Against, not for On-World Government and New World Order,” LifeSiteNews.com, July 8, 2009.

John Laughland, The Tainted Source: The Undemocratic Origins of the European Idea (Little, Brown & Company, 1997), pp.154-155.

Robert John Arujo, “International Law Clients: The Wisdom of Natural Law,” Fordham Urban Law Journal, August, 2001.

For a few examples among many, see the following reports: Our Global Neighborhood (The Commission on Global Governance, Oxford University Press, 1995 – directly supported and endorsed by the UN Secretary General); Toward a Rapid Reaction Capability for the United Nations (Government of Canada, 1995); Rethinking Basic Assumptions About the United Nations (World Federalist Association, 1992); Reshaping the International Order (Club of Rome, 1976).

UN Millennium Forum, May 22-26, 2000. See the final document, Millennium Forum Declaration and Agenda for Action.

Cliff Kincaid, “Who Will Probe the UN-Vatican Connection?” Accuracy in Media, August 4, 2009. (www.aim.org).

José E. Alvarez, The Schizophrenias of R2P, Panel Presentation at the 2007 Hague Joint Conference on Contemporary Issues of International Law: Criminal Jurisdiction 100 Years After the 1907 Hague Peace Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, June 30, 2007.

For more on the R2P concept see Volume 2, Issue 7 of Forcing Change (www.forcingchange.org) – “Kosovo and the International Community: Just Another Pawn in the Game.”

Jim Puzzanghera, “Calls grow for global banking regulator,” Los Angeles Times, October 17, 2008 (online archived edition).

Richard N. Cooper, “Is There a Need to Reform?” The International Monetary System: Forty Years After Bretton Woods (Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 1984), p.33.

Reprinted in Eric Frattini’s book, The Entity: Five Centuries of Secret Vatican Espionage (St. Martin’s Press, 2008), p.2.

Address by His Holiness Pope Pius XII During an Audience with Delegates of the Fourth Congress of the World Movement for World Federal Government, 6 April 1951. A copy of this speech is in the author’s library. It is reprinted in its entirety in The Power Puzzle: A Compilation of Documents and Resources on Global Governance (2004, can be obtained at the Forcing Change website, www.forcingchange.org).

Pope John XXIII, Pacem in Terris, paragraphs 137 to 141.

Holy Father’s Talk at United Nations, October 4, 1965. Reprinted in its entirety in The Power Puzzle: A Compilation of Documents and Resources on Global Governance (www.forcingchange.org).

Address of His Holiness John Paul II, United Nations Headquarters, Thursday, 5 October 1995.

Address of John Paul II to the International Court of Justice during the Meeting at the Peace Palace, The Hague, 13 May 1985.

Sollicitudo rei socialis, paragraph 43.

Pope John Paul I was in office for only 33 days before being murdered in 1978. During that time he made a number of speeches, but I have found none that directly support global governance.

Volumes have been published on the role of the Holy See in global dealings, including banking, espionage, and international diplomacy. One of the most recent books on this subject is The Entity: Five Centuries of Secret Vatican Espionage, by Eric Frattini (St. Martin’s Press, 2008).

Eric Frattini The Entity: Five Centuries of Secret Vatican Espionage (St. Martin’s Press, 2008), p.1.

Avro Manhattan, The Vatican in World Politics (Gaer Associates, 1949), pp.28-29.

“Frequently Requested Catholic Church Statistics,” Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, Georgetown University, statistics are for 2009; http://cara.georgetown.edu/bulletin/index.htm.

Doing the Truth in Love. A copy of the document, along with signers, can be found at www.cpjustice.org/doingthetruth

The Croat liquidation of Orthodox Serbs was one of the most horrific examples of genocide in modern history. So gruesome were the attacks that “even hardened German troops registered their horror.”

See John Cornwell, Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII (Viking, 1999), pp.248-260.

See also Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, the Nazis, and the Swiss Banks by Mark Aarons and John Loftus (St. Martin’s Griffin, 1998); and Avro Manhattan, The Vatican’s Holocaust (Ozark Books, 1986). Mark Aarons and John Loftus attest to Manhattan’s credibility, explaining; “he was very well informed, having worked for British intelligence during the war” (Unholy Trinity, p.86).

This report, Sowing the Seeds of Global Government: The Vatican’s Quest for a World Political Authority, explains how the Roman Catholic Church has taken a prominent role in the unfolding plan to establish a world government.

Researcher Carl Teichrib examines how and why:

• The Vatican is fully engaged in what former Vaticaninsider and author Malachi Martin described in his book The Keys of This Blood as a battle for control over an emerging world government.

• Pope Benedict, the leader of 1.2 billion Catholics, endorsed a “World Political Authority,” a form of world government, in his recent encyclical “Caritas in Veritate.”

• This world authority, in the Vatican view, is supposed to “manage the economy,” bring about “timely disarmament,” and ensure “food security and peace.”

• In practice, the Vatican plan means expanding the power and authority of such global institutions as the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the World Trade Organization.

• Despite the hope that “subsidiarity” or local control can be incorporated into this emerging world system, a possible or even likely result is global tyranny.”

Note: This report overwhelmingly supports my recent blog post-You Decide:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/14/the_new_world_order!.thtm

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Who Was Assata Shakur?

The following AIM Column, written by Cliff Kincaid on October 2, 2009, will paint a disturbing picture of Assata Shakur and what Marc Lamont Hill from Fox News did recently in remembrance of him-You Decide:

The Extreme Makeover of Fox News Analyst Marc Lamont Hill:

Who would plaster his Twitter page with police mug shot photos of convicted cop-killer Assata Shakur? Fox News contributor Marc Lamont Hill did. At least until David Horowitz and Accuracy in Media took notice and wrote about it. Now the page features photos of boxing great Muhammad Ali. Hill’s MySpace page is also gone.

There are other changes as well. The tributes to Shakur and black racist Khallid Muhammad, known as “America’s Black Hitler,” have disappeared from his web pages. The articles were saved, however, and can be found here.

Remember that Hill had claimed that he hadn’t written the tribute to the cop-killer, and that it had been posted under his name and written by someone else, even though it was signed, “Marc.” The claim was difficult to take seriously.

There was no confusion about the Muhammad piece, since it included personal references to Hill’s growing-up years. That article concluded, “‘I LOVE YOU AND MISS YOU DR. KHALLID.”

Meanwhile, Fred Gielow’s excellent new book, “I Can’t Believe You Said That!,” has been published, with a section on Muhammad. Considering some of the statements reproduced in this book, one can understand why the tribute to him would be taken off Hill’s website. But we are still left wondering why it was there in the first place. You will recall that Hill, who appears regularly on “The O’Reilly Factor,” had described Muhammad as “a mentor, teacher, and revolutionary hero.”

In Gielow’s book, Muhammad is quoted as declaring in1995, “This is the time of the black man’s rise and the white man’s demise.” This quote is rather mild, compared to what he said in his 1996 “Kill the White Man” speech to a black audience:

“…I say, goddamnit, we kill ‘em all! [applause] You say, well why kill ‘em all? Why kill the women? First, why kill the babies? They’re just little innocent blue-eyed babies. Because goddamnit, they’re gonna grow up one day to rule your babies. Kill ‘em now.”

Fox analyst Hill has declared his belief that the brain aneurysm that claimed Muhammad’s life was somehow deliberately induced by outside forces and that Muhammad was “assassinated.”

This was also the implication of a January 12, 2004, release from the New Black Panther Party under the title of “Was Khallid Abdul Muhammad Assassinated?” The organization explained, “If the enemy can kill our leaders and be comfortable that no investigation will take place, the enemy will continue his mischief.”

The report includes some other controversial quotes. Muhammad is actually quoted as telling his supporters, “If I slip on a bar of soap in the shower, goddammit, the white man did it!”

The apparent attempt to sanitize the web pages of Marc Lamont Hill will not be successful. All of the offensive material has been retained. Indeed, Internet archives have produced some other revealing material about the Fox News Channel contributor.

On December 6, 2006, when reports indicated that Cuban dictator Fidel Castro was sick, Fox News contributor Marc Lamont Hill declared on his blog that he was afraid the information might be true. “My fears about Fidel’s health are not only personal but political,” he wrote.

“This past week,” he wrote, “Cuba celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Cuban revolution, as well as Fidel Castro’s 80th birthday. Despite the huge number of dignitaries, aging revolutionaries, and fellow citizens in attendance, El Comandante was not in attendance. While a no-show at this type of event is curious for any leader, it is unthinkable for Fidel, who thrives on such moments. In fact, the only thing that could keep him away is the very thing that scares me the most: Fidel was too sick to attend.”

The thought of this dictator dying was just too much for Hill to take.

When Hugo Chavez was elected in Venezuela, Hill declared, “In the wake of Fidel’s declining significance, Chavez has quickly emerged as the loudest political voice of Latin America, as well as one of the world’s most prominent and powerful anti-imperialist heads-of-state.”

Hill is still listed as one of the “emerging black thinkers” and “scholars” who blogs at the Root, a Web magazine associated with Obama friend Henry Louis Gates and launched by the Washington Post Company. Gates, of course, is the black Harvard academic defended by Obama after he charged a white police officer with racism for arresting him as he was breaking into his home. The police had been called to the scene by a neighbor concerned that a robbery was taking place. While the charges were dropped, the police officer who arrested Gates for disorderly conduct was defended by black and white officers alike for his professionalism. Obama, however, said that the police had acted “stupidly.”

Back in February 2008, Hill wrote that he thought Barack Obama was too much of a moderate. “For many black people,” he wrote, “Obama’s success would provide symbolic value by showing that the black man (not woman!) can make it to the top. Although black faces in high places may provide psychological comfort, they are often incorporated into a Cosbyesque gospel of personal responsibility (‘Obama did it, so can you!’) that allows dangerous public policies to go unchallenged.”

Hill warned about “the triple threat of global racism, poverty, and militarism” and warned that Obama may not turn out to be “the revolutionary outsider that he’s portrayed to be.”

He also declared, “Obama has been conspicuously silent on topics such as the prison industrial complex, the Zionist occupation of Palestine, and the economic underdevelopment of Africa.”

One item has not disappeared from Hill’s web page. An entry on his curriculum vitae, under the heading of “Recent Conference Papers, Presentations, and Invited Lectures,” still includes “January 2006, The Importance of Ideological Training in the New Millenium [sic]. Invited Speaker at Polymathematic University (Political Education Progam for the Poor Righteous Communist Party).” Actually, the name of the group is the Poor Righteous Party of the Black Nation. It is a communist group of the Maoist kind, however.

Strangely, the CV also lists the following: “February 2007, From Slavery To Hip-Hop. Keynote Address at Federal Bureau of Investigation (Newark Divison) Black History Celebration.“

What will Hill’s comrades in the Poor Righteous Party of the Black Nation think when they find out that he spoke to the FBI?

What’s more, why is Fox News silent about the entire controversy, other than issuing a one-sentence statement early on that it did not share Hill’s views on terrorist cop-killer Assata Shakur?

Here’s the contact information:

Company Information:

FOX News Channel, 1211 Avenue of America-2^nd Floor, New York, NY 10036

Phone: 212-301-3000

Web: www.foxnews.com

Primary Press Contact:

Brian Lewis, Executive Vice President

Corporate Communications

Phone: 212-301-3331

Fax: 212-819-0816

E-Mail: brian.lewis@foxnews.com

Secondary Contact:

Irena Briganti, Senior Vice President

Media Relations

Phone: 212-301-3608

Fax: 212-819-0816

E-Mail: irena.briganti@foxnews.com

Thank you for your help.

For America’s Survival, Inc.

Cliff Kincaid, President

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

H.R. 2454-The “Cap & Trade” Bill Passed By The House

“The Cap and Trade bill passed in the House and now is in the Senate.  A lot has been said about the enormous tax hit and energy price hikes to every tax payer that will follow this bill, but not much has been leaked about the impact on your ability to sell and maintain your home.  Read on..

H.R. 2454, the “Cap & Trade” bill passed by the House of Representatives,  if also passed by the Senate, will be the largest tax increase any of us has ever experienced. The Congressional Budget Office (supposedly non-partisan) estimates that in just a few years the average cost to every family of four will be $6,800 per year.

No one is excluded. However, once the lower classes feel the pinch in their wallets, you can be sure these voters get a tax refund (even if they pay no taxes at all) to offset this new cost. Thus, you Mr. and Mrs. Middle Class America will have to pay even more since additional tax dollars will be needed to bail out everyone else.



But wait. This bill (that no one in Congress appears to have actually read) has many more surprises in it.

Probably the worst one is this:

A year from now you won’t be able to sell your house. The caveat is (there always is a caveat) that if you have enough money to make required major upgrades to your home, then you can sell it. But, if not, then forget it. Even pre-fabricated homes (“mobile homes”) are included.

In effect, this bill prevents you from selling your home without the permission of the EPA administrator.

To get this permission, you will have to have the energy efficiency of your home measured. Then the government will tell you what your new energy efficiency requirement is and you will be forced to make modifications to your home under the retrofit provisions of this Act to comply with the new energy and water efficiency requirements. Then you will have to get your home measured again and get a license (called a “label” in the Act) that must be posted on your property to show what your efficiency rating is; sort of like the Energy Star efficiency rating label on your refrigerator or air conditioner.

If you don’t get a high enough rating, you can’t sell. And, the EPA administrator is authorized to raise the standards every year, even above the automatic energy efficiency increases built into the Act.

The EPA administrator, appointed by the President, will run the Cap & Trade program (AKA the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009″) and is authorized to make any future changes to the regulations and standards he alone determines to be in the government’s best interest.

Requirements are set low initially so the bill will pass Congress; then the Administrator can set much tougher new standards every year. The Act itself contains annual required increases in energy efficiency for private and commercial residences and buildings. However, the EPA administrator can set higher standards at any time.

Sect. 202 Building Retrofit Program mandates a national retrofit program to increase the energy efficiency of all existing homes across America .

Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won’t be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act.

You had better sell soon, because the standards will be raised each year and will be really hard (i.e, ex$pen$ive) to meet in a few years.

The Act allows the government to give you a grant of several thousand dollars to comply with the retrofit program requirements if you meet certain energy efficiency levels. But, wait, the State can set additional requirements on who qualifies to receive the grants. You should expect requirements such as “can’t have an income of more than $50K per year”, “home selling price can’t be more than $125K”, or anything else to target the upper middle class (and that’s YOU) and prevent them from qualifying for the grants. Most of us won’t get a dime and will have to pay the entire cost of the retrofit out of our own pockets. More transfer of wealth, more “change you can believe in.”



Sect. 204 Building Energy Performance Labeling Program establishes a labeling program that for each individual residence will identify the
achieved energy efficiency performance for “at least 90 percent of the residential market within 5 years after the date of the enactment of this
Act.”

This means that within 5 years 90% of all residential homes in the U.S. must be measured and labeled. The EPA administrator will get $50M each year to enforce the labeling program. The Secretary of the Department of Energy will get an additional $20M each year to help enforce the labeling program. Some of this money will, of course, be spent on coming up with tougher standards each year. Oh, the label will be like a license for your car.

You will be required to post the label in a conspicuous location in your home and will not be allowed to sell your home without having this label.

And, just like your car license, you will probably be required to get a new label every so often – maybe every year. But, the government estimates the cost of measuring the energy efficiency of your home should only cost about $200 each time. Remember what they said about the auto smog inspections when they first started: that in California it would only cost $15. That was when the program started. Now the cost is about $50 for the inspection and certificate; a 333% increase. Expect the same from the home labeling program.

Sect. 304 Greater Energy Efficiency in Building Codes establishes new energy efficiency guidelines for the National Building Code and mandates at 304(d) that 1 year after enactment of this Act, all state and local jurisdictions must adopt the National Building Code energy efficiency provisions or must obtain a certification from the federal government that their state and/or local codes have been brought into full compliance with the National Building Code energy efficiency standards.



Here is the link for the bill:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h2454pcs.txt.pdf



Home owners take note & tell your friends and relatives who are home owners!!! Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won’t be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act.

ARE YOU SURE YOU VOTED CORRECTLY LAST ELECTION????



REMEMBER TO VOTE IN THE NEXT ELECTION!



ARE YOU FEELING THE SQUEEZE YET?????

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Ongoing Concerns With This President and His Administration!

These recent news articles, books, blog posts and/or videos should give every God, Country & Family Loving American Citizen enough reason to be concerned with the disgusting actions that have been covertly taken by this President and his administration since day one, with the help of the Main Stream Media, that I adamantly believe are systematically eroding our Constitutional Rights and will ultimately destroy this Great Country of Ours -You Decide:

National & Homeland Security Issues:

Time to Act Like a President:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/28/AR2009092802484.html

Hoekstra: “Obama Missed Chance to Confront Iran at U.N.”:

http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Hoekstra_nuclear_iran/2009/10/01/267222.html

McCain: Nuclear Iran ‘Very Likely’:

http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/mccain_nuclear_iran/2009/10/01/267232.html?s=al&promo_code=8B08-1

Eagleburger: “Use Military Option on Iran”:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/eagleburger_iran_nukes/2009/10/02/267714.html?s=al&promo_code=8B08-1

43 U.S. Troops Have Died in Afghanistan Since Gen. McChrystal Called for Reinforcements:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/10/01/43-u-s-troops-have-died-in-afghanistan-since-gen-mcchrystal-called-for-reinforcements/

3 U.S. Troops Have Died in Afghanistan Since Gen. McChrystal Called for Reinforcements:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54807

Candidate Obama Repeatedly Said He Would Reinforce U.S. Troops in Afghanistan:

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=54753

White House Starts Review of Afghan Strategy:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125427038855351227.html

U.S. commander in Afghanistan talked with Obama only once:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/29/u-s-commander-in-afghanistan-talked-with-obama-only-once/

Time for sanctions against Iran:

http://www.semissourian.com/story/1573581.html

Iran Tests Advanced Missiles, Threatens Israel On Public Television:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133617

Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related To Gaza
Memorandum for the Secretary of State [FR Doc. E9-2488
Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P:

http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488

ISLAM ON CAPITOL HILL 2009:

http://islamoncapitolhill.com/Home_Page.html

Obama flubs Foreign Policy:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/28/obama-flubs-foreign-policy/

Obama team clears 75 at Guantanamo for release:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/29/obama-team-clears-75-at-guantanamo-for-release/

Obama Administration Frees Three More Gitmo Detainees:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/28/obama-administration-frees-three-more-gitmo-detainees/

Obama Legacy: Youth Unemployment 52.2%:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/28/obama-legacy-youth-unemployment-52-2/

Obama Lied, Soldiers Died:

http://www.redstate.com/haystack/2009/09/23/obama-lied-soldiers-died/

McChrystal: More Forces or ‘Mission Failure’:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/22/mcchrystal-more-forces-or-mission-failure/

What’s the Rush? “White House Says Troop Levels Are Only One Part of U.S. Policy in Afghanistan”:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/09/whats-the-rush-white-house-says-troop-levels-are-only-one-part-of-us-policy-in-afghanistan-.html

Iran Test-Fires More Missiles:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=42407089001&s=al&promo_code=8A9E-1

U.S. and Allies Warn Iran Over Nuclear ‘Deception’:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/26/world/middleeast/26nuke.html?nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1

Broad Coalition Calls For Action On Iran:

http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/iran_united_nations_obama/2009/09/25/264890.html

Cops, deputies warned again about right-wing ‘terrorists’ SPLC alarm: ‘Militiamen, white supremacists, anti-Semites, nativists, tax protesters coalescing’:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=111078

Administration Will Cut Border Patrol Deployed on U.S-Mexico Border:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/25/administration-will-cut-border-patrol-deployed-on-u-s-mexico-border/

Obama Cuts Border Patrol Agents:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=42053362001&s=al&promo_code=8A85-1

Who is Threatening the Life of President Obama?

http://www.usasurvival.org/ck092009.html

Constitutional Rights Issues:

SOVEREIGNTY AND FREEDOM IS ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Roth/laurie182.htm

Ron Paul: Obama Czars Are Unconstitutional:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=41840825001&s=al&promo_code=8A85-1

Legislation Still Under the Radar Would Devastate U.S. Gun Ownership Rights:

http://www.personalliberty.com/freedom-concerns/legislation-still-under-the-radar-would-devastate-u-s-gun-ownership-rights/

Issues with President Obama & His Administration:

The Vapor Bill – Congress’ Secret Plan to Pass Obamacare’:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/02/the-vapor-bill-–-congress’-secret-plan-to-pass-obamacare-update/

Clinton Issues Holiday Greetings to Muslims, Not Jews:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133674

Hawaii AG Mark Bennett Approved Fukino’s Natural-Born Citizen Statement: “All Records Should Be Made Public According To Law”:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/terrik-investigation-part-3-hawaii-ag-mark-bennett-approved-fukinos-natural-born-citizen-statement-all-records-should-be-made-public-according-to-law/

Morning Bell: “The Obama Jobs Gap Grows Again”:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/02/morning-bell-the-obama-jobs-gap-grows-again/

263,000 Jobs Lost in September, Far More Than Forecast:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/03/business/economy/03jobs.html?_r=1&hp

Obama’s Work Ethic:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/10/01/obamas-work-ethic/

Morning Bell: “The Obama Czar State Is About To Kill The Economy”:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/01/morning-bell-the-obama-czar-state-is-about-to-kill-the-economy/

White House Mum on Gadhafi Grants:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/white_house_gaddafi_/2009/09/28/265569.html?s=al&promo_code=8A95-1

Obama ‘Safe school czar’ encouraged child sex with an older man:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/30/obama-safe-school-czar-encouraged-child-sex-with-an-older-man/

Jackson: Confusion & Fear Factors Against to Healthcare Bill:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=42081331001&s=al&promo_code=8A9E-1

Senate Panel Kills Government Healthcare Plan:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/healthcare_public_option/2009/09/29/266165.html?s=al&promo_code=8ABA-1

Bill Frist: Healthcare Bill Could Implode System:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=42083034001&s=al&promo_code=8A9E-1

Morning Bell: “Obamacare Puts Transparency and Accountability on Death Bed”:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/25/morning-bell-obamacare-puts-transparency-and-accountability-on-death-bed/

Clinton: “Right-wing conspiracy aims at Obama”:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/28/clinton-right-wing-conspiracy-aims-at-obama/

Obama Plans Internet Grab: FCC to Embrace ‘Net Neutrality’:

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_internet_fcc/2009/09/20/262385.html?s=al&promo_code=8961-1

The Day ObamaCare Died – Sung by Barack Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3KDmEvNmJ0

President Obama’s Ties to Bill Ayers, Founder of Weather Underground:

Author confirms Bill Ayers helped Obama write ‘Dreams’ “New release on president’s marriage verifies work of WND’s Jack Cashill pointing to ex-terrorist’s role”:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=110784

Issues With President Obama’s Ties To ACORN:

Watching ACORN Get Chopped Down:

http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/watching-acorn-get-chopped-down/

Obama’s Top Aide Gaspard Tied to ACORN:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_acorn_gaspard/2009/09/28/265678.html?s=al&promo_code=8AA5-1

ACORN’s Man in the White House:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/28/acorns-man-in-the-white-house/

ACORN Operative in White House:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=42484643001&s=al&promo_code=8A9E-1

IRS Severs Ties With ACORN Over Scandal:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_acorn_irs/2009/09/23/263856.html?s=al&promo_code=8A5D-1

ACORN Sues Hidden-Camera Filmmakers:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_acorn_lawsuit/2009/09/23/263910.html?s=al&promo_code=8A5D-1

Issues With The Main Stream Media (MSM):

Relationship Between GE, NBC and White House:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/2009/09/steve-milloy-on-o-factor-discussing.html

No government bailout for newspapers:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/No-government-bailout-for-newspapers-8320229.html

Rallies catch fire against Obama’s ‘Minion Media’ ‘Operation: “Can You Hear Us Now?’ exploding 1 week after WND report”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110672

Bozell Grassroots Message: The Power of the Alternative Media:

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?v=GdkUkUkU8z

Note: They also overwhelmingly support my recent blog post -You Decide:

Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government-Why?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/have-americans-stopped-having-confidence-in-their-government/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government-Why?

The following recently published New York Times Op-Ed article is another great example of how Americans are being brainwashed into believing that anyone who disagrees with where this country is headed under this administration is either “nuts” or a “right-wing radical and/or psychopath” who should have his/her gun(s) taken away from them-You Decide:

The Guns of August-Published By The New York Times-Posted By Frank Rich, Op-Ed Columist-On August 22, 2009:

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“IT is time to water the tree of liberty” said the sign carried by a gun-toting protester milling outside President Obama’s town-hall meeting in New Hampshire two weeks ago. The Thomas Jefferson quote that inspired this message, of course, said nothing about water: “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” That’s the beauty of a gun — you don’t have to spell out the “blood.”

The protester was a nut. America has never had a shortage of them. But what’s Tom Coburn’s excuse? Coburn is a Republican senator from Oklahoma, where 168 people were murdered by right-wing psychopaths who bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995. Their leader, Timothy McVeigh, had the Jefferson quote on his T-shirt when he committed this act of mass murder.

Note: There is no hard evidence that Timothy McVeigh was in fact a leader of any right-wing group of psychopaths.  Timothy McVeigh was not a “Bill Ayers” who was the founder of the Weatherman Underground “a home-grown terrorist group” from the 1960’s that planted bombs that targeted other Americans and/or Institutions and is now a college/university professor that teaches young adults how to be radicals by standing up against their government when they disagree with their policies. My recent blogs speak to Timothy McVeigh’s life story and Bill Ayers & the Weatherman Underground issue-You Decide:

Timothy McVeigh & Terry Nichols: Oklahoma Bombing:

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/notorious/mcveigh/dawning_1.html

“Ayer Head” Professor Defends Terrorist Ayers!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/“ayer-head”-professor-defends-terrorist-ayers/

Were Weatherman Members “Terrorists”?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/19/were_weatherman_members_terrorists.thtml

S.F. police union accuses Ayers in 1970 bombing!

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/13/sf_police_union_accuses_ayers_in_1970_bombing!.thtml

Note: Recent Article That Supports My Concerns With The President’s Ties To Bill Ayers-You Decide:

Communism in the Classroom “Academic Terrorism”:

http://www.usasurvival.org/20august09.html

What Was The Weather Underground?

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/romerstein_rtp.pdf

Yet last Sunday, when asked by David Gregory on “Meet the Press” if he was troubled by current threats of “violence against the government,” Coburn blamed not the nuts but the government

“Well, I’m troubled any time when we stop having confidence in our government,” the senator said, “but we’ve earned it.”

Coburn is nothing if not consistent. In the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, he was part of a House contingent that helped delay and soften an antiterrorism bill. This cohort even tried to strip out a provision blocking domestic fund-raising by foreign terrorist organizations like Hamas. Why? The far right, in league with the National Rifle Association, was angry at the federal government for aggressively policing America’s self-appointed militias.

Note: My recent blogs speak to the issue of “our president blatantly lying about his Muslim past and his ties to Islamic and/or terrorist individuals or groups” and the fact that “first there was a Missouri Analysis and Information Center (MIAC) Report that profiled certain individuals as being potential violence-prone “militia members”, then there was a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “extremist” report, and now there is a New York Congressman’s bill that was introduced in the House of Representatives that denies Second Amendment rights to everyone listed in these reports”-You Decide:

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 10, 2008:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

It’s Getting Very Serious Now!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/it’s-getting-very-serious-now/

How Much Longer Will We Be “Allowed” To Keep Our Guns?

http://weroinnm.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/22/how_much_longer_will_we_be_“allowed”_to_keep_our_guns.thtml

Barack Obama’s Civilian Army:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,543822,00.html

In a 1996 floor speech, Coburn conceded that “terrorism obviously poses a serious threat,” but then went on to explain that the nation had worse threats to worry about: “There is a far greater fear that is present in this country, and that is fear of our own government.” As his remarks on “Meet the Press” last week demonstrated, the subsequent intervention of 9/11 has not changed his worldview.

I have been writing about the simmering undertone of violence in our politics since October, when Sarah Palin, the vice-presidential candidate of a major political party, said nothing to condemn Obama haters shrieking “Treason!,” “Terrorist!” and “Off with his head!” at her rallies. As vacation beckons, I’d like to drop the subject, but the atmosphere keeps getting darker.

Coburn’s implicit rationalization for far-right fanatics bearing arms at presidential events — the government makes them do it! — cannot stand. He’s not a radio or Fox News bloviator paid a fortune to be outrageous; he’s a card-carrying member of the United States Senate. On Monday — the day after he gave a pass to those threatening violence — a dozen provocateurs with guns, at least two of them bearing assault weapons, showed up for Obama’s V.F.W. speech in Phoenix. Within hours, another member of Congress — Phil Gingrey of Georgia — was telling Chris Matthews on MSNBC that as long as brandishing guns is legal, he, too, saw no reason to discourage Americans from showing up armed at public meetings.

In April the Department of Homeland Security issued a report, originally commissioned by the Bush administration, on the rising threat of violent right-wing extremism. It was ridiculed by conservatives, including the Republican chairman, Michael Steele, who called it “the height of insult.”

Note: My recent blogs speak to the contents of the disgraceful Homeland Security right-wing extremism alert report-You Decide:

DHS Targets Veterans:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/16/dhs_targets_veterans.thtml

Shocking New Report! Obama’s Real Terrorists: Targeting Patriots and The Right!:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/shocking-new-report-obamas-real-terrorists-targeting-patriots-and-the-right/

Since then, a neo-Nazi who subscribed to the anti-Obama “birther” movement has murdered a guard at the Holocaust museum in Washington, and an anti-abortion zealot has gunned down a doctor in a church in Wichita, Kan.

This month the Southern Poverty Law Center, the same organization that warned of the alarming rise in extremist groups before the Oklahoma City bombing, issued its own report. A federal law enforcement agent told the center that he hadn’t seen growth this steep among such groups in 10 to 12 years. “All it’s lacking is a spark,” he said.

This uptick in the radical right predates the health care debate that is supposedly inspiring all the gun waving. Nor can this movement be attributed to a stepped-up attack by Democrats on this crowd’s holy Second Amendment. Since taking office, Obama has disappointed gun-control advocates by relegating his campaign pledge to reinstate the ban on assault weapons to the down-low.

Note: My recent blog speaks to the President’s recent appointment of a Supreme Court Justice who believes that our Constitution’s Second Amendment “Right to Bear Arms” does not apply to individual citizens-You Decide:

Is Being An Empathetic Liberal Minority The New Prerequisite for Being a Supreme Court Justice?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/is-being-an-empathetic-liberal-minority-the-new-prerequisite-for-being-a-supreme-court-justice/

No, the biggest contributor to this resurgence of radicalism remains panic in some precincts about a new era of cultural and demographic change. As the sociologist Daniel Bell put it, “What the right as a whole fears is the erosion of its own social position, the collapse of its power, the increasing incomprehensibility of a world — now overwhelmingly technical and complex — that has changed so drastically within a lifetime.”

Bell’s analysis appeared in his essay “The Dispossessed,” published in 1962, between John Kennedy’s election and assassination. J.F.K., no more a leftist than Obama, was the first Roman Catholic in the White House and the tribune of a new liberal order. Bell could have also written his diagnosis in 1992, between Bill Clinton’s election and the Oklahoma City bombing. Clinton, like Kennedy and Obama, brought liberals back into power after a conservative reign and represented a generational turnover that stoked the fears of the dispossessed.

While Bell’s essay remains relevant in 2009, he could not have imagined in 1962 that major politicians, from a vice-presidential candidate down, would either enable or endorse a radical and armed fringe. Nor could he have imagined that so many conservative intellectuals would remain silent. William F. Buckley did make an effort to distance National Review from the John Birch Society. The only major conservative writer to repeatedly and forthrightly take on the radical right this year is David Frum. He ended a recent column for The Week, titled “The Reckless Right Courts Violence,” with a plea that the president “be met and bested on the field of reason,” not with guns.

Those on the right who defend the reckless radicals inevitably argue “The left does it too!” It’s certainly true that both the left and the right traffic in bogus, Holocaust-trivializing Hitler analogies, and, yes, the protesters of the antiwar group Code Pink have disrupted Congressional hearings. But this is a false equivalence. Code Pink doesn’t show up on Capitol Hill with firearms. And, as the 1960s historian Rick Perlstein pointed out on the Washington Post Web site last week, not a single Democratic politician endorsed the Weathermen in the Vietnam era.

This week the journalist Ronald Kessler’s new behind-the-scenes account of presidential security, “In the President’s Secret Service,” rose to No. 3 on The Times nonfiction best-seller list. No wonder there’s a lot of interest in the subject. We have no reason to believe that these hugely dedicated agents will fail us this time, even as threats against Obama, according to Kessler, are up 400 percent from those against his White House predecessor.

But as we learned in Oklahoma City 14 years ago — or at the well-protected Holocaust museum just over two months ago — this kind of irrational radicalism has a myriad of targets. And it is impervious to reason. Much as Coburn fought an antiterrorism bill after the carnage of Oklahoma City, so three men from Bagdad, Ariz., drove 2,500 miles in 1964 to testify against a bill tightening federal controls on firearms after the Kennedy assassination. As the historian Richard Hofstadter wrote in his own famous Kennedy-era essay, “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” these Arizona gun enthusiasts were convinced that the American government was being taken over by a “subversive power.” Sound familiar?

Even now the radicals are taking a nonviolent toll on the Obama presidency. Obama complains, not without reason, that the news media, led by cable television, exaggerate the ruckus at health care events. But why does he exaggerate the legitimacy and clout of opposition members of Congress who, whether through silence or outright endorsement, are surrendering to the nuts? Even Charles Grassley, the supposedly adult Iowa Republican who is the Senate point man for his party on health care, has now capitulated to the armed fringe by publicly parroting their “pull the plug on grandma” fear-mongering.

For all the talk of Obama’s declining poll numbers this summer, he towers over his opponents. In last week’s Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll, only 21 percent approve of how Republicans in Congress are handling health care reform (as opposed to the president’s 41 percent). Should Obama fail to deliver serious reform because his administration treats the pharmaceutical and insurance industries as deferentially as it has the banks, that would be shameful. Should he fail because he in any way catered to a decimated opposition party that has sunk and shrunk to its craziest common denominator, that would be ludicrous.

Note: I, like many other Americans, have little or no faith in polls due to our bad experiences during the final days of the Presidential Election, as substantiated by this NewsMax article that revealed that almost every major pollster, to include the MSM, had egg on its face after the election because, most predicted a double-digit win for Sen. Obama, but only two pollsters were accurate and critics say that the inflated numbers helped Sen. Obama by reducing enthusiasm and support-You Decide:

Pollsters Inflated Sen. Obama’s Lead?

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/polls_inflated_obama_lead/2008/11/05/147971.html?s=al&promo_code=7059-1

The G.O.P., whose ranks have now dwindled largely to whites in Dixie and the less-populated West, is not even a paper tiger — it’s a paper muskrat. James Carville is correct when he says that if Republicans actually carried out their filibuster threats on health care, it would be a political bonanza for the Democrats.

In last year’s campaign debates, Obama liked to cite his unlikely Senate friendship with Tom Coburn, of all people, as proof that he could work with his adversaries. If the president insists that enemies like this are his friends — and that the nuts they represent can be placated by reason — he will waste his opportunity to effect real change and have no one to blame but himself.

Note: I am a registered Democrat and I found this article and the statement by Daniel Bell as another disgusting tactic used by this administration to brainwash Americans, like myself, that are more concerned about the disgusting direction that this administration is taking us, which has nothing what so ever to do with having fear of the erosion of our social position, the collapse of our power, or the increasing incomprehensibility of the world.  My recent blogs can attest to my overall concerns with this administration, which are further supported by recent news articles and/or blogs-You Decide:

My Blogs By Topic/Issue:

Where Is America Today?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/where-is-america-today/

I. President Obama’s Background:

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 10, 2008:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

Letter To My Family & Friends After Our 2008 Historical Election:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/letter-to-my-family-friends-after-our-2008-historical-election/

II. President Obama’s Eligibility Status:

The Real-Deal About Obama And Congressional & Court Silence!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/the-real-deal-about-obama-and-congressionalcourt-silence/

New RICO Case Filed:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/21/new_rico_case_filed.thtml

Key Witness In Obama’s Passport Fraud Case Fatally Shot:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/19/key_witness_in_obama’s_passport_fraud_case_fatally_shot.thtml

President Obama’s Eligibility Status Press Release!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/president-obama’s-eligibility-status-press-release/

Letters E-Mailed To NM U.S. Senators & Congressman!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/letters-e-mailed-to-nm-u-s-senators-u-s-congressman/

Letter To NM U.S. Senator On President’s Eligibility Status:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/letter-to-nm-u-s-senator-on-presidents-eligibility-status/

Letter To FBI Albuquerque Field Office:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/09/letter_to_fbi_albuquerque_field_office.thtml

The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/the-obama-birth-certificate-protection-act/

Exclusive: A Letter to Rupert Murdoch on the Obama Birth Certificate Question!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/exclusive-a-letter-to-rupert-murdoch-on-the-obama-birth-certificate-question/

Note: These recent news articles and/or blogs overwhelmingly support my concerns with this President’s Eligibility Status-You Decide:

Hawaiian newspapers don’t prove birthplace “Announcements published in 1961 not solid evidence of U.S. location”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104678

‘Birth hospital’: Letter for real “New images of ‘Obama document’ at center of eligibility controversy”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104146

Barack Obama’s refusal to provide his original birth certificate raises increasing public doubts:

http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/2009/07/barack-obamas-refusal-to-provide-his.html

Certifigate: Claim: Obama Kenyan Birth Registration? The Saga Continues:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6908

Obama’s MySpace page: I’m 52 years old, not 48 “Would place president’s birth during time Hawaii was a territory”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107163

Lou Dobbs Right on Obama Birth Certificate:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/dobbs_right_obama_birth/2009/08/03/243134.html?s=al&promo_code=8493-1

CNN gives boot to talk radio hosts “Described as ‘all noise’ and too predictable”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106837

The Politics of Hysteria:

http://www.blueoregon.com/2009/08/the-politics-of-hysteria.html?cid=6a00d8341c2c3f53ef0120a4e1c634970b

Texas “Birther Bill” Congressman Refuses to Show Own Birth Certificate:

http://www.allgov.com/ViewNews/Texas_Birther_Bill_Congressman_Refuses_to_Show_Own_Birth_Certificate_90810

OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FACT SHEET:

https://secure.conservativedonations.com/usjf_obamabirth/factsheet.pdf

Official Obama nativity story continues to unravel “Girlfriend places mother in Seattle in August 1961”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107889

The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=3255

What does Pelosi know about Obama’s eligibility?

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/14/what-does-pelosi-know-about-obamas-eligibility/

DNC Failed to Certify Obama as Eligible in MOST States!

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15127

III. President Obama & His Administration:

First 100 Days-Administration Working Hard To Fix The Problems President Bush Left Behind?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/first-100-days-administration-working-hard-to-fix-the-problems-president-bush-left-behind/

Was Promise To Restrict Lobbyists Just Another Lie?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/04/was_promise_to_restrict_lobbyists_just_another_lie.thtml

Do Alinsky’s Rules Define This Administration’s Governing Style?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/do-alinsky’s-rules-define-this-administration’s-governing-style/

Has President Elect Obama Used Alinsky’s Rules In The Past?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/has-president-elect-obama-used-alinsky’s-rules-in-the-past/

Does President Obama Suffer From NPD?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/does-president-obama-suffer-from-npd/

Are We Witnessing Conversational Hypnosis At Work?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/12/are_we_witnessing_conversational_hypnosis_at_work.thtml

What is Project 21?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/27/what_is_project_21.thtml

What Draws Leftists To Unbridled Totalitarianism?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/31/what_draws_leftists_to_unbridled_totalitarianism.thtml

What Do The Give & Serve America Acts Entail?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/25/what_do_the_give__serve_america_acts_entail.thtml

Can We Survive Obamanomics?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/12/can_we_survive_obamanomics.thtml

Are we witnessing a “Messiah” or a “Magician” at work?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/05/are_we_witnessing_a_“messiah”_or_a_“magician”_at_work.thtml

The Marketing of Evil:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/03/the_marketing_of_evil.thtml

The U.S. Government: Devious Or Just Plain Stupid?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/25/the_us_government_devious_or_just_plain_stupid.thtml

United in Hate:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/26/united_in_hate.thtml

Legality of Secession: 10th Amendment to The U.S. Constitution:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/21/legality_of_secession_10th_amendment_to_the_us_constitution.thtml

Breach of “Peace”:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/20/breach_of_peace.thtml

Are Americans faced with an unresponsive and unaccountable one-party political system?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/15/are_americans_faced_with_an_unresponsive_and_unaccountable_one-party_political_system.thtm

The Audacity of Socialism:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/06/the_audacity_of_socialism.thtml

Political Correctness vs. Freedom of Thought:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/13/political_correctness_vs_freedom_of_thought.thtml

U.S. Predicted To Collapse In 2010:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/04/us_predicted_to_collapse_in_2010.thtml

Note: These recent news articles, videos and/or blogs overwhelmingly support my concerns with this President & his administration-You Decide:

POLL: AMERICANS LOSING CONFIDENCE IN OBAMA:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/08212009/news/nationalnews/poll__americans_losing_confidence_in_oba_185686.htm

Obama fires back at political critics:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.233373d23429b898bbcc4a0e13f0af00.c41&show_article=1

Health Care Town Halls Turn Violent in Tampa and St. Louis:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/07/health-care-town-hall-turns-violent-tampa/

White House to Democrats: ‘Punch back twice as hard’:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/25891.html

Physicians speak out on health care bill:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6563705.html

Missing the Facts on Townhall Concerns:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/08/21/missing-the-facts-on-townhall-concerns/

Morning Bell: Myths and Facts about Obamacare:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/08/24/morning-bell-myths-and-facts-about-obamacare/

A President as Micromanager: How Much Detail Is Enough?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125003045380123953.html

Marine Corps Vet Blasts Dem Congressman for Calling ObamaCare Protesters ‘Brown Shirts’:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/08/23/marine-corps-vet-blasts-dem-congressman-calling-obamacare-protesters-

The Note: Looking Back — Baggage crowds out Obama agenda — even on vacation:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/08/looking-back-baggage-crowds-out-obama-agenda-even-on-vacation.html

What Was The Weather Underground?

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/romerstein_rtp.pdf

Obama’s “Progressive” Backers:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/AS_%20Rprt_Obama_Progressive_Backers.pdf

Wilson Apologizes, But Still Thinks Obama Wasn’t Honest:

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wilson_obama_healthcare/2009/09/10/258528.html?s=al&promo_code=8870-1

Axelrod Dismisses Tea Party as Wrong:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/14/axelrod-dismisses-tea-party-a-wrong/

David Horowitz: Obama ‘Manchurian Candidate’:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/horowitz_obama_manchurian/2009/09/14/259832.html?s=al&promo_code=88A6-1

IV. President’s Ties To Communist/Terrorist/Radical Individuals and/or Groups:

Obama’s “Sex Rebel” Communist Mentor: The “Naked Truth” About Frank Marshall Davis: Sex Specialist:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Rpt_Davis_Sex.pdf

Communism In Hawaii and the Obama Connection:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/hawaii-obama.pdf

Communists,” Progressives,” Obama, and the Media:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Column_on_Communism_ASI.pdf

What Are Our Leader’s Communist Connections?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/31/what_are_our_leaders_communist_connections.thtml

Obama Office Operates in Philly’s Islamist Corridor by David J. Rusin Pajamas Media on October 22, 2008:

http://www.islamist-watch.org/article/983

Sen. Obama’s Ties to Farrakhan?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=77539

The paid Soviet Agent Behind Axelrod and Sen. Obama:

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-file-47-paid-soviet-agent-behind.html

Who Is David Axelrod – Obama’s Political Advisor?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/22/who_is_david_axelrod_–_obama’s_political_advisor.thtml

Sen. Obama’s Official Blogger Is A Hardcore Marxist:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/29708_Obamas_Official_Blogger-_A_Hardcore_Marxist/comments/

The Obama Youth Revolution – Sing for Change:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxP3XbKKDOE&feature=related

Barack Obama’s kids and Hitler youth sing for their leader:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdPSqL9_mfM&feature=related

Obama Hitler youth style brainwashing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onXd8iH3OVQ&feature=related

President Elect Obama’s Connection to Bill Ayers:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/07/cnn-obamas-lying-about-william-ayers/comment-page-1/#comments

Sen. Obama’s Radical Islamic Past and Ties To Terrorist Groups:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/17/sen_obamas_radical_islamic_past_and_ties_to_terrorist_groups.thtml

Revolutionary Communist Party!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/revolutionary-communist-party/

The Tiger Song:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/17/the_tiger_song.thtml

Note: Recent Article That Supports My Concerns With The President’s Ties To Communists-You decide:

TREASON AND TED KENNEDY: “THE STORY THE MEDIA WON’T TELL”:

http://www.usasurvival.org/ck0828-309.html

What Was The Weather Underground?

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/romerstein_rtp.pdf

From Henry Wallace to William Ayers-The Communist and “Progressive” Movements:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Wallace_to_Ayers_Communist_Progressive.pdf

Who is President Obama’s Green-Jobs Czar-Van Jones?

http://www.usasurvival.org/ck08.25.09.html

Beck: American People Stood Up to Bring Down Van Jones:

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/beck_jones_obama_boycott/2009/09/06/256993.html?s=al&promo_code=8834-1

Olbermann Wants Dirt on Glenn Beck, Roger Ailes:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/olbermann_beck_ailes/2009/09/07/257171.html?s=al&promo_code=8836-1

From Henry Wallace to William Ayers-The Communist and “Progressive” Movements:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Wallace_to_Ayers_Communist_Progressive.pdf

Campaign For America’s Future:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Campaign4Amca_Future.pdf

V. President’s Ties To ACORN:

ACORN Charged With Voter Registration Fraud!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/acorn-charged-with-voter-registration-fraud/

ACORN-The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-Automaker Labor Unions:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/06/acorn-the_community_reinvestment_act_cra-automaker_labor_unions_amended_42109.thtml

New York Times Finally Admits It Spiked Obama/ACORN Corruption Story!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/new-york-times-finally-admits-it-spiked-obamaacorn-corruption-story/

Note: Recent Article That Supports My Concerns With The President’s Ties To ACORN-You Decide:

Guess who screened White House appointments! “Think tank developed by prez links socialist party to presidential picks”-Published By WorldNetDaily-Posted By Arron Lkein-On August 20, 2009:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107418

House Votes to Defund ACORN:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_congress_acorn/2009/09/17/261491.html?s=al&promo_code=893B-1

All the news that’s fit to suppress:

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/20/all-the-news-thats-fit-to-suppress/

VI. President Obama & Main Stream Media Ties:

Censored News!

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/01/censored_news!.thtml

Dig this: Media actually probed other candidates “Divulged personal documents on arrests, surgeries, colleges”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106051

Senior Citizens & Others Disgustingly Kept In Dark By The MSM!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/24/senior-citizens-others-disgustingly-kept-in-dark-by-the-msm/

The Obama Loving media’s attack on the truth:

http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/09/18/the-obama-loving-medias-attack-on-the-truth/

VII. Financial Economic Melt-Down:

Was Financial Collapse An Orchestrated Event?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/28/was_financial_collapse_an_orchestrated_event.thtml

What is The Connection Between Obama and Tim Giether?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/18/what_is_the_connection_between_obama_and_tim_giether.thtml

Obama’s Code of Secrecy:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/15/obamas_code_of_secrecy.thtml

A Fat Lie!

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/20/a_fat_lie!.thtml

New York Fed Chairman’s Ties to Goldman Raise Questions!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/new-york-fed-chairmans-ties-to-goldman-raise-questions/

Note: Recent Article That Supports My Concerns With Our Financial Economic Meltdown Stimulus Package-You Decide:

Fannie Mae seeks $10.7B in US aid after 2Q loss:

http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=111&sid=1734689&FORM=ZZNB4

Estimate for 10-Year Deficit Raised to $9 Trillion:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/26/business/economy/26deficit.html?_r=1&hp

VIII. National & Homeland Security:

33 Minutes-Protecting America During New Missile Age:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/33-minutes-protecting-america-during-new-missile-age/

A 9/10 Security Mindset:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/a-910-security-mindset/

DHS Targets Veterans:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/16/dhs_targets_veterans.thtml

Homeland Issued ‘Extremism’ Report Despite Objections:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/18/homeland_issued_extremism_report_despite_objections.thtml

Another Imminent Homeland & National Security Issue!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/another-imminent-homeland-national-security-issue/

Pelosi Criticized Over Interrogation Briefings!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/pelosi-criticized-over-interrogation-briefings/

Is President Obama’s Shameful Politics Harming The CIA?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/is-president-obama’s-shameful-politics-harming-the-cia/

Does Human Rights Law Apply to Terrorists?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/does-human-rights-law-apply-to-terrorists/

Top Intelligence Republican: Obama: ‘Ready, Fire, Aim’!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/top-intelligence-republican-obama-ready-fire-aim/

High Level Pentagon Official Blames U.S. For Al-Qaeda Attacks!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/high-level-pentagon-official-blames-us-for-al-qaeda-attacks/

NYC Police: Terror Suspects Wanted To Commit jihad!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/nyc-police-terror-suspects-wanted-to-commit-jihad/

Pros & Con’s of The Bush Presidency Middle East Policy:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/pros-con’s-of-the-bush-presidency-foreign-policy/

Analysis: NKorea’s Bomb Test Adds To Atomic Threat!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/analysis-nkoreas-bomb-test-adds-to-atomic-threat/

Chinese Terrorists Release in U.S. Imminent!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/chinese-terrorists-release-in-us-imminent/

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america/

Note: Recent Articles, Videos and/or Blogs That Support My Concerns With National & Homeland Security-You Decide:

Obama Fails To Fill 40 Percent of Top DoD Appointments:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/08/20/obama-fails-to-fill-40-percent-of-top-dod-appointments/#more-13272

5 U.S. troops killed as Afghan violence swells:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-afghan-violence7-2009aug07,0,6266361.story

Our Aging Deterrent:

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?secid=1501&status=article&id=334968505308994

Justice Dept. Report Advises Pursuing C.I.A. Abuse Cases:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/us/politics/24detain.html?emc=na

CIA Chief Blows Up Over Eric Holder’s Inquisition:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=35106960001&s=al&promo_code=85F8-1

Justice Dept. Releases Top-Secret Prisoner Abuse Details:

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&bctid=35106960001&s=al&promo_code=85F8-1

C.I.A. Abuse Cases Detailed in Report on Detainees:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/25/us/politics/25detain.html?nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1

Morning Bell: The Left’s War On The CIA:

http://blog.heritage.org/

Obama Administration Releases Gitmo Detainee Mohammed Jawad:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/08/obama-administration-releases-gitmo-detainee-mohammed-jawad.html

Young Guantanamo prisoner back in Afghanistan:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090824/ap_on_re_as/cb_guantanamo_prisoner_release

Prosecuting the CIA Undermines Our Security:

http://www.newsmax.com/kessler/prosecuting_cia_/2009/08/24/251596.html

Brown repulsed by Lockerbie bomber’s Libya welcome:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090825/ap_on_re_eu/lockerbie

Barack Obama’s Civilian Army:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,543822,00.html

What Was The Weather Underground?

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/romerstein_rtp.pdf

CIA Counter-Terrorism Expert: Obama and Holder ‘At War’ with Agency:

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_holder_war_with_cia/2009/08/31/254698.html?s=al&promo_code=87B8-1

George Pataki: “Obama is Jeopardizing U.S. Security”:

http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/pataki_9_11_obama_attack/2009/09/07/257203.html?s=al&promo_code=8841-1

Third Site Missile Defenses Would Demonstrate the Indivisibility of Transatlantic Security:

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/

Eastern Europe grumbles about downgrade in US ties:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090917/ap_on_re_eu/eu_eastern_europe_missile_defense

Analysis: Advantage to Russia in US missile move:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090918/ap_on_re_eu/eu_russia_us_analysis

Obama’s Missile Defense Cuts Come Under Attack:

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/missile_defense_obama/2009/09/19/262228.html?s=al&promo_code=895D-1

US: Too Late to Stop Iran:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133615

IX. Erosion of Our First Amendment Rights:

White House Plan Puts Bull’s-Eye On Talk Shows Posted Agenda Issues Warning About New ‘Obligation’ Review-Posted on WorldNetDaily.Com-By Bob Unruh-One January 26, 2009:

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87172

American Journalists are trampling the Sacrifice of Our Fathers, Mothers, Sisters and Brothers (Unfortunately, the Journalists taking part in this travesty far outnumber the headstones at Normandy):

http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/american-journalists-are-trampling-the-sacrifice-of-our-fathers-mothers-sisters-and-brothers/

Note: Recent Articles That Support My Concerns With The Erosion and/or Ultimate Destruction or Our Constitutional Rights -You Decide:

Senate support builds for ‘Fairness Doctrine’ “Harkin accused of trying to ’squelch’ 1st Amendment”:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=88603

‘Fairness Doctrine’ question still unanswered ‘I’ll study up,’ says presidential spokesman:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=88618

The Left’s New Threats to Silence the Right:

http://www.mrcaction.org/517/petition.asp?PID=19937552&NID=1

Special Report: Is US Chief Information Officer (CIO) Vivek Kundra a Phony?

http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/08/12/special-report-is-us-chief-information-officer-cio-vivek-kundra-a-phony/

Victory for First Amendment Rights at UMass Amherst: Administration Rejects Censorship of Newspaper:

http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article/10510.html

Bill would give president emergency control of Internet:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

FCC ‘Diversity’ Chief Asked Liberals to Fight Limbaugh:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/fcc_lloyd_limbaugh/2009/08/27/253165.html?s=al&promo_code=86C0-1

White House spying on social networking web sites:

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2684-Law-Enforcement-Examiner~y2009m9d16-White-House-spying-on-social-networking-web-sites

X. Erosion of Our Second Amendment Rights:

How Much Longer Will We Be “Allowed” To Keep Our Guns?

http://weroinnm.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/22/how_much_longer_will_we_be_“allowed”_to_keep_our_guns.thtml

Is Being An Empathetic Liberal Minority The New Prerequisite for Being a Supreme Court Justice?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/is-being-an-empathetic-liberal-minority-the-new-prerequisite-for-being-a-supreme-court-justice/

XI. Combat & Retired Veteran’s Benefits:

Are Disabled Combat Veteran’s Being Asked To Pay For Their Health Care?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/12/are_disabled_combat_veterans_being_asked_to_pay_for_their_health_care.thtml

Another Heavy Assault On Veterans’/Retirees’ Benefits!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/another-heavy-assault-on-veterans’retirees’-benefits/

XII. School Reform:

Shouldn’t School Reform Mean-Doing What’s Best for Our Kids?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/04/24/shouldnt_school_reform_mean-doing_whats_best_for_our_kids.thtml

Note: Recent Article That Supports My Concerns With The President’s Ties To Bill Ayers-You Decide:

Communism in the Classroom “Academic Terrorism”:

http://www.usasurvival.org/20august09.html

From Henry Wallace to William Ayers-The Communist and “Progressive” Movements:

http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Wallace_to_Ayers_Communist_Progressive.pdf

What is Obama’s Real Education Agenda?

http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=3410

XIII. Racism Under This Administration:

Note: Recent Articles, Videos and/or Blogs That Support My Concerns With Racism Under This Administration-You Decide:

Buying Brand Obama:

http://academic.udayton.edu/Race/ObamaandRacism/Obama19.htm

Highlights from Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings:

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=8112790

The McKinney Affair: Rampaging Racism and a Cowardly Caucus:

http://academic.udayton.edu/race/03justice/justice08.htm

Glenn Beck: Obama Is a Racist:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/07/29/politics/main5195604.shtml

White Anger Fueling Health Care Debate:

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_13180531?nclick_check=1

NY Gov. Rants About ‘Racist’ Media:

http://video.newsmax.com/Manage/Videos/VideoGallery/NY-Gov–Rants-About–Racist–Media

Threats Against The President:

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=6105692

Voight: Is Obama creating a civil war in America?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/21/inside-the-beltway-68484451/

Statement of Project 21 Fellow Deneen Borelli on Allegations of Racism Against Critics of Obama Policies:

http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Racism_Obama_091609.html

Disclaimer: Although I share numerous resources with you, as a means of supporting my comments and/or concerns, it does not necessarily mean that I support and/or agree with the contents of all of them, word-by-word, but find them thought provoking because, they provide me with other views besides my own and, thereby, help me make my case.

As a retired Marine Corps Veteran Officer (Mustang), I pride myself with loving my God, family, friends and my country and those Military and/or Veteran Comrades, that I am honored to call friends, know that I would never intentionally say or do anything that would hurt or demean anyone, to include my God and Country.

I have always preached to my own family and follow the rule of “filtering everything that comes from my brain through my heart before it comes out of my mouth” and this rule has done me well for 62 years of my life and would highly recommend it to anyone that dares to share their own views with others, knowing that they may not have the same views, but are able and willing to accept that and not take it personal.

I also consider the sharing of these and/or any other verbal or written comments or concerns to be given me under our “FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS”, which I consider as one of the corner stones of our “Constitution” and, as an American, I believe that it is my “God Given Duty” to stand up for and defend this or any other rights given me under our Constitution, as other God and Country loving Americans in uniform have done in the past and continue to this date:

Oath Keepers: Orders We Will Not Obey:

http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/2009/03/oath-keepers-declaration-of-orders-we.html

Note: I believe that this administration has used our financial economic crises, the two wars, terrorist threats here at home and abroad, a DHS Extremist Alert targeting Veterans and the Swine Flu Epidemic, as detractors, with the disgusting help of the Main Stream Media, while they accomplish their hidden agenda, which continues to covertly erode our ”Constitutional Rights” , that will ultimately destroy this great country of ours.

Additionally, as a military Veteran, I’ve always prided myself as being intelligent, level headed and normally don’t listen to conspiracies, but my gut tells me that something reeks with this new administration-You Decide.

Bottom Line: If my concerns are proven to be true, which I hope and pray they are not:

“God Bless & Keep Our United States of America Safe”

“Food For Thought”

Semper Fi!

Exclusive: A Letter to Rupert Murdoch on the Obama Birth Certificate Question!

Question: What action have you taken, as a means of educating yourself as to the status of this President’s eligibility or do you believe, like others do, that the issue is “frivolous” and/or mute and are confident that he meets the “Natural Born Citizen” eligibility requirement to be our President?

If you are one of those individuals that takes what our Main Stream Media dishes out as the bible truth and believes that this eligibility issue is “frivolous” and/or mute and just another partisan attempt to discredit our first African-American President, then this article is for you because, it will hopefully wake you up and motivate you to take some urgent and time sensitive action to educate yourself on this critical issue and join the cause by standing up for and defending those rights given us under our “Constitution” before they’re taken away from all of us-You Decide:

Exclusive: A Letter to Rupert Murdoch on the Obama Birth Certificate Question: By John D. Hemenway, Esq.-On May 14, 2009:

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3320/pub_detail.asp

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“Editor’s note: The following is a letter written by John D. Hemenway, Esq. that was sent to NewsCorp CEO Rupert Murdoch via certified mail.

May 14, 2009

Dear Rupert,

You will likely not have retained a clear memory of me from Worcester College in the early fifties. Much time has elapsed from when we both read “P.P.E.” under Asa Briggs and the others. I had looked forward to cementing our friendship when the death of your father caused you simply to “disappear” from those at Worcester.

Much later, during several visits to my Washington, D.C. home, my moral tutor, David Mitchell, filled me in on the magnificent assistance you provided the College. Perhaps you also had something to do with the “Mitchell Building” erected just off Walton Street.

Everyone who shares your views is pleased at the nearly unprecedented success story you have made of your life. I was very pleased when you became an American, even if some persons attributed your motivation as calculated to expand your economic interests. Pure jealousy! You and your accomplishments have been good for us all.

From time to time, I try to keep up with interesting details concerning your news empire. From that reading, I am certain you and I have many opinions in common. I subscribe to the N.Y. Post, which one can acknowledge is “tabloidish,” but describes real N.Y. City life and the Post’s editorial staff certainly offers solid opinions pertaining to U.S. governmental problems. “Fox News” also makes an outstanding contribution to public awareness of the issues confronting the country.

You may recall the vital contribution Worcester’s Provost John Masterman made to the winning of WWII; he was a key figure, as I remember, in organizing the counter-espionage effort against the Nazis. I write you now concerning a problem nearly of that magnitude.

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman, N.Y. Post

1211 Avenue of the America

New York, N.Y. 10036

That problem is this: the man now occupying the White House is likely Constitutionally unqualified to hold the office. As an adopted American, you will have studied the U.S. Constitution better than many Americans, and from P.P.E. studies know that the Constitution has flexible clauses and hard, literal clauses. One of the latter is the requirement of Article II, Section 1, which states:  “No person except a natural-born citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of the President.”

There are indications that Obama cannot meet that requirement. As an attorney, I facilitated a lawsuit (Hollister vs. Soetoro et al.) in the United States District Court (D.C. Circuit) demanding that Obama produce his birth certificate or satisfactory substitute evidence. There are about 20 similar lawsuits across the nation. In my case, U.S. District Court Judge Robertson (a Clinton appointee), who summarily dismissed the case, and is rumored to be seeking an Obama appointment, wrote that Obama’s eligibility had been “blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry.” In other words, he accepted internet “blogs” in lieu of actual evidence.

He ordered me to “show cause” why I should not be sanctioned for promotion of a “frivolous” lawsuit. (It is significant that, although dismissed, none of the twenty odd similar legal actions have been designated by the responsible judge as “frivolous.”)

Other lawsuits have usually been dismissed for “lack of standing” including a lawsuit brought by Presidential candidate, Ambassador Alan Keyes. If anyone has standing, it is an actual Presidential contender. I provided Judge Robertson 37 pages of explanation as to “why I should not be held in contempt” and he decided to “reprimand” me instead of his threatened sanctions. That case is now under appeal.

Any rational person with even partial knowledge of the facts must know that Obama-cum-Soetoro is desperate to conceal something he does not want known. I believe he is hiding the fact that he and his campaign conspired to assert eligibility for the Presidential office to which he well may not be entitled. In other parts of the world, this would be known as a coup d’etat.

Yet, “mainstream” news services, members of officialdom, judges, including justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have all failed to demand documentation to prove or disprove Obama’s qualifications to serve in the White House.

It is as if a 53% vote is a substitute for an actual determination of the legal qualifications of Obama to be President. It is also evident that consequential people in America all believe the “vetting” of qualifications to be a presidential candidate should have been someone else’s responsibility. Revelation of this massive collapse of the fundamentals of the electoral process (ensuring candidate eligibility) at this point would make some very important people look hopelessly incompetent and inept.

Sadly, that includes your “Fox News.” There are reports that top management of Fox instructed its commentators to stay away from the subject – a strange position for a service that deservedly won a reputation for “fair and balanced” reporting. I cannot believe that you would issue such an order, with your good sense. Was it Roger Ailes or someone else? When I worked with Accuracy in Media (AIM) several decades ago, news manipulation by Ailes never filled the staff with confidence. On May 1, Sean Hannity referred to Ailes as his “boss!”

It is also disturbing that a report circulates that a Saudi national who bought enough stock to win a seat on the board of Fox’s parent company, a Saudi prince, asked you to stop Fox from referring to Muslim youth unrest as “Muslim” riots – he boasted later at a conference in Dubai, that after a phone call to you, thirty minutes later, Fox removed the banner from the bottom of its screen, “Muslim” riots. Given this revelation, many FOX devotees are wondering why the eligibility issue has been ignored by your network.

This constitutional question is one of vital importance to the U.S. It is not as if we wanted to startle our contemporaries with actions calculated to stir up our contemporaries as you once did at Worcester with your bust of Lenin. Or as I did when ruffling feathers of our stuffy dean (who guarded the door of “his” library from allowing anyone actually to touch one of his rare books). After you left for Australia to tend to family problems, I hung a huge American flag from the windows of the Nuffield Building on the 4th of July. The dean’s order (conveyed to me by my scout) still rings in my ears, “Take that damn thing down!”

The “natural-born” clause in our Constitution is a rigid, not a flexible clause. In that respect, it is analogous to the banning of “cruel or unusual” punishments, a clause dear to the hearts of our founding fathers. They certainly heard tales from their grandfathers drawn directly from English experience of ingenious cruelties accompanying the crime of “Regicide” after “dictator” Oliver Cromwell died peacefully in his bed. The fact that the English could not devise a way to govern themselves without inviting the king back may suggest that you modify somewhat your prediction (which I read somewhere) that this will be the last British generation that will live under a monarchy! I recall the first review of my educational “progress” at term’s end in “Hall” at Worcester when David Mitchell described my understanding of English history as limited to “King John was a bad king!”

Since you are now an American, and a good one, too, I have no doubt that you will seek to support the Constitution every way you think wise. Consider that, having won election on a campaign that promised “openness and transparency,” Obama now has spent close to $1 million for concealment of his birth and academic records, which are the only means to prove his eligibility. A birth certificate would cost less than $20.00 to request from the State of Hawaii.

Obama has produced no documents at all that would support his claim to eligibility to office. Is it no longer responsible to claim that “the public has a right to know the truth?” Moreover, even if born in Hawaii, as he claims, Obama’s travel to Pakistan (when Americans reportedly were banned from travel there) in 1981 raises other, complicated issues.

Why did his supporters produce a misleading “certification of live birth” instead of an actual vault birth certificate? Forensic experts have testified that the Certification of Live Birth is a forgery; written on a laser printer, when such printers were not available in 1961.

This evokes shades of Richard Nixon’s problems with typewriters (not just once, re: Alger Hiss; but a second time, when Nixon was caught back-dating documents for the I.R.S.) It makes me proud that in his secret tapes, Nixon referred to me, saying, “Fire the son-of-a-bitch, he’s done this before!” – a reference to my testimony before the Senate against incompetent or dishonest Nixon appointees, such as Helmut Sonnenfeldt (known locally as “Kissinger’s Kissinger) who failed confirmation as Deputy Secretary of Treasury because of my testimony before the Senate Finance Committee.

I also testified against the first “career” foreign service officer ever to fail confirmation in the 182 year history of the U.S. Senate: Howard Mace, who was Director of Personnel of the Department of State, who lost his appointment as Ambassador to Sierra Leone. Senate testimony may ultimately prove useful in this Obama matter, despite the composition of the Congress at this time.

Nixon’s firing order directly led me to study law at Howard University, the prestigious largely African-American University in Washington, D.C. Nixon’s denunciation of me, in fact, boosted me in the eyes of the Dean at Howard and got me to this point.

In conclusion, I can tell you this as fact. America badly needed your brilliant creation: Fox News. But if Fox News really is to be a voice for rational conservatism in the United States, it cannot ignore this vital constitutional question: We have a man occupying the White House who refuses to disclose the very documents that would legitimate his Presidency. Was it not a cover-up that undid Richard Nixon? Please instruct your personnel from Roger Ailes on down that they are encouraged (not forbidden) to report all of the news, including that pertaining to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

With best regards, your supporter, friend, and admirer, John D. Hemenway”

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributor John D. Hemenway, Esq. is a World War II veteran, Naval Academy graduate and a Rhodes scholar.”

Note: My recent blogs will give you some idea of the peaceful and legal action that I have taken on this issue, as a means of standing up for and defending our “Constitutional Rights” and I share them with you in hopes that you join the cause by taking the same or similar action as it relates to this time sensitive and urgent issue-You Decide:

Letters & E-Mails Requesting President Obama’s Eligibility Status:

This blog contains a copy of a letter and/or email that I have sent to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor-US Attorney for the District of Columbia, my NM US Congressman, my NM US Senators and our Albuquerque FBI Field Office:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/letters-e-mails-sent-requesting-president-obama’s-eligibility-status/

President Obama’s Eligibility Status Press Release!

This blog contains a Press Release that I e-mailed to all News Media outlets:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/

Senior Citizens & Others Disgustingly Kept In Dark About President’s Eligibility Status By The MSM!

Question: Do you realize that a large majority of our senior citizen’s, those over 40 years old and many others who, for what ever reason, do not have access to and/or are NOT Internet savvy, are literally being kept in the dark when it comes to the President’s eligibility requirements under Article II, section I of our Constitution and other current negative issues affecting our country because, they rely solely on the Main Stream Media (MSM), who not only blatantly and disgustingly keeps them in the dark, but continually paints a rosy picture, while the President and his administration covertly erode their “Constitutional Rights”, that will ultimately destroy their country.

This blog contains an article that reveals a concerted effort by World Net Daily to bring the President’s eligibility issue to the forefront by erecting billboards around the country asking where the President’s missing birth certificate is at, which I believe is a great idea, but some Americans seem to be concerned that the billboards may not contain enough information to get the most bang for the buck because, the President’s name doe not appear on them and, as I mentioned above, many individuals still have no idea that there is a problem with the President’s eligibility status, which revolves around the missing original (vault copy) of his birth certificate:

Comment: I also donated to this great cause of erecting billboards, as means of educating the American public-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/24/senior-citizens-others-disgustingly-kept-in-dark-by-the-msm/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Does President Obama Suffer From NPD?

Question: Has it ever crossed your mind that President Obama might be suffering from a Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), like other leaders, who in time are proven to be subtle, refined, socially-adept, manipulative, possessed of thespian skills, overly convincing, lacking of empathy and are ruthless and relentlessly driven, as evidenced by the numerous controversial actions taken by him during the first few months of his administration?

This peace, written by Joseph Farah, editor and CEO of WorldNetDaily provides you with his own diagnosis of President Obama’s state of mind, along with evidence that supports that diagnosis-You Decide:

These are pertinent excerpts from his diagnosis:

“I KNOW.  “Is Barack Obama Crazy?” is a pretty provocative subject for an email.  I admit, I don’t know the answer to the question.

But, given Barack Obama’s actions in the first few months of his administration, it’s a valid question.

And so, the May issue of WorldNetDaily’s acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine takes it on.

Let’s examine some of the evidence:

• If you held a job and people were questioning your qualifications, and all you had to do to put an end to those questions, not to mention more than a dozen lawsuits filed against you, was to produce a valid birth certificate you claimed to possess, would you refuse to take that simple step? Or would you, as Obama has done, spend at least $1 million to fight the lawsuits? I think most people would agree that someone who chose the latter is either crazy or doesn’t have a valid birth certificate.

• Let’s say you got a job in which you succeeded someone with whom you disagreed passionately. Would you try to have that person prosecuted over those differences, knowing that some day, someone with whom you disagree would succeed you and possibly contemplate the same course of action? That’s what Obama talked about doing in the case of his disagreement with George W. Bush over the practice of coercive interrogations – policies, I might point out, that were employed not just by his immediate predecessor, but by every war-time president in the history of the United States.

• Or what do you make of Obama’s efforts to ban the use of the words “terror” and “terrorism” from his administration’s lexicon? The administration prefers to call attacks on terrorists “overseas contingency operations.” And terrorist attacks at home are referred to as “man-caused disasters.” These new terms are apparently considered less offensive to terrorists.

• While there are hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens voluntarily serving in arms overseas, the Obama administration put out a report to law enforcement agencies throughout the country to be wary of returning veterans, because they might be more inclined to get involved in “right-wing extremist” activities.

• Obama presides – legitimately or illegitimately – over a nation founded on the ideals of “independence” and “national sovereignty.” Yet, in a speech given in Prague, what was his prescription for making the world a better place? “All nations must come together to build a stronger, global regime,” he said.

• How about his solution to an economic crisis spurred by too much indebtedness? More debt.

• Let’s say you’re the first black president. Do you appoint a black attorney general who indicts the people who just elected you as a “nation of cowards” on matters of race?

• Imagine appointing to a top policy position at the Defense Department, a columnist from the Los Angeles Times who believes U.S. policies were to blame for the 9/11 attacks by al-Qaida. That would be Rosa Brooks, who also previously referred to Obama’s immediate predecessor as “our torturer in chief “ and a “psychotic who need(s) treatment” while comparing Bush’s arguments for waging a war on terrorism to Adolf Hitler’s use of political propaganda.

I could go on, but I think you get the picture.

I don’t know if any of these actions mean the president is crazy. But I do know they mean he is dangerous to the security and prosperity of the nation.

For a more complete diagnosis, I refer you to the May issue of WND’s acclaimed Whistleblower magazine, titled NARCISSIST IN CHIEF: Experts explain what makes Barack Obama tick.”

Note: This diagnosis seems to support my recent blogs-You Decide:

Are We Witnessing Narcissism At Work?

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/10/are_we_witnessing_narcissism_at_work.thtml

Are We Witnessing Conversational Hypnosis At Work?

This blog reveals an eye-opening document that contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis, which seem to make a good case that President Obama uses a little known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know, which he uses as a means of accomplishing his hidden agenda-You Decide:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/12/are_we_witnessing_conversational_hypnosis_at_work.thtml

Are We Witnessing Alinsky’s Rules At Work?

This blog contains articles that give you some background information relating to Alinsky’s Rules and how the President and the Democrats have used these rules in the recent past to attain their hidden agendas-You Decide:

http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/06/are_we_witnessing_alinsky’s_rules_at_work.thtml

Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 10, 2008:

This blog contains a summary of the results of my extensive research into Senator Obama’s personal and career background, which I conducted as a means of educating myself prior to casting my ballot, that was completed on November 3, 2008 (two days prior to the election), along with a list of unanswered questions and numerous concerns relating to his lack of executive experience, seemingly shady background and his association with radical individuals and/or organizations (Tell me who you hang around with and I’ll tell you who you are!)-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/extensive-research-into-senator-obama’s-background-completed-on-november-10-2008/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Analysis: NKorea’s Bomb Test Adds To Atomic Threat!

Question: Was Vice President Biden correct when he stated that President Obama would be tested by a National Security crisis within six months after taking office and could North Korea’s recent second underground test of a nuclear device and the test-firing of two short-range missiles Tuesday, after test-firing three short-range missiles Monday, be his test?

These articles seem to suggest that North Korea’s nuclear test makes it no likelier that the regime will actually launch a nuclear attack, but it adds a scary dimension to another threat: the defiant North as a facilitator of the atomic ambitions of others, potentially even terrorists-You Decide;

Analysis: NKorea’s bomb test adds to atomic threat: Posted on Yahoo! News-By Robert Burns, AP National Security Writer-On May 26, 2009:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090526/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_us_north_korea_analysis

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“WASHINGTON – North Korea’s nuclear test makes it no likelier that the regime will actually launch a nuclear attack, but it adds a scary dimension to another threat: the defiant North as a facilitator of the atomic ambitions of others, potentially even terrorists.

It also presents another major security crisis for President Barack Obama, already saddled with wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and a nuclear problem with Iran.

Obama assured the president of South Korea and the prime minister of Japan that the U.S. remains committed to the defense of their nations, the White House said in a statement following Obama’s calls to the leaders Monday night.

Obama and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak “agreed that the test was a reckless violation of international law that compels action in response,” the White House said.

“They agreed to work closely together to seek and support a strong United Nations Security Council resolution with concrete measures to curtail North Korea’s nuclear and missile activities.”

South Korea’s Yonhap news agency reported that North Korea had test-fired two short-range missiles Tuesday after test-firing three short-range missiles Monday.

It’s far from clear what diplomatic or other action the world community will take. So far, nothing they’ve done has worked.

At an earlier juncture of the long-running struggle to put a lid on North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, the administration of President Bill Clinton in the mid-1990s discussed with urgency the possibility of taking military action. That seems less likely now, with the North evidently nuclear-armed and the international community focused first on continuing the search for a nonmilitary solution.

Meeting in emergency session in New York, the U.N. Security Council on Monday condemned North Korea’s nuclear test as a clear violation of a previous U.N. resolution banning such testing. The council said it would begin work immediately on a new legally binding resolution.

Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said Tuesday that the resolution “will have teeth in it, and I expect additional sanctions.

“The pressure will increase on North Korea economically and otherwise, and North Korea will recognize that its actions have only left it further isolated, and further debilitated,” Rice said on CBS’ “The Early Show.”

The North’s announcement that it conducted its second underground test of a nuclear device drew quick condemnation across the globe, including from its big neighbor and traditional ally, China.

The Obama administration, which said the North’s action invited stronger, unspecified international pressure, has consistently called for Korean denuclearization but seemed not to have anticipated a deepening nuclear crisis.

Just two weeks ago, the administration’s special envoy for disarmament talks with North Korea, Stephen Bosworth, said during a visit to Asian capitals that “everyone is feeling relatively relaxed about where we are at this point in the process.” If so, they are no longer.

North Korea conducted its first atomic test in 2006 and is thought to have enough plutonium to make at least a half-dozen nuclear bombs. It also is developing long-range ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, in defiance of U.N. actions.

One of the first estimates of the size of Monday’s nuclear explosion came from the Russian defense ministry, which put the yield at between 10 and 20 kilotons — comparable to the U.S. bombs that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan in August 1945. But a senior U.S. administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said it appeared the explosive yield was much smaller, perhaps a few kilotons. The official said more technical analysis would be done in coming days.

The administration official also disclosed that North Korea notified the State Department less than one hour before the explosion that it intended to conduct a nuclear test at an unspecified time. The U.S. then notified China, Russia, Japan and South Korea, the official said.

The United States could still try to resuscitate so-called six-party talks with the North as well as work with other members of the United Nations. North Korea has vowed not to resume participation in the six-party talks with the U.S., Japan, South Korea, China and Russia.

The Bush administration worked hard to get China, in particular, to press the North Koreans to denuclearize, and it seems likely that Obama will push equally hard with Beijing, which sided with the North Koreans against U.S. and United Nations forces during the 1950-53 Korean War. In recent years the Chinese have openly criticized the North Koreans for the nuclear arms program.

Two of the main worries about North Korea are left unsaid: Would it use a nuclear bomb to attack a neighbor or the United States? And might it continue an established pattern of selling nuclear wherewithal and missiles to foreign buyers?

Graham Allison, an assistant secretary of defense in the Clinton administration and now director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University, said Monday that the international community regularly underestimates North Korean leader Kim Jong Il’s willingness to do the unexpected.

“Could this guy believe he could sell a nuclear bomb to Osama bin Laden?”

Allison asked in a phone interview. “Why not?”

EDITOR’S NOTE — Robert Burns has covered national security affairs for The Associated Press since 1990.”

N. Korea Warns of ‘Merciless Punishment’: Posted on AOL News-By HYUNG-JIN KIM, AP-On May 27, 2009:

http://news.aol.com/article/north-korea-test-fires-2-more-missiles/434846

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“SEOUL, South Korea (May 27) – North Korea launched a tirade Wednesday against world powers threatening to punish it for conducting its second nuclear test, saying it is not afraid of sanctions and calling South Korea’s decision to join an operation to prevent the spread of weapons a declaration of war.

The North also has reportedly restarted its weapons-grade nuclear plant. It staged a rally in its capital, Pyongyang, on Tuesday to celebrate the test.

The isolated communist regime said through its official news agency that it would respond with military action if South Korea tries to stop or search any of its ships as part of the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative.

“Those who provoke (North Korea) once will not be able to escape its unimaginable and merciless punishment,” the North’s official news agency said.

South Korea decided to join the anti-proliferation initiative on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s mass-circulation Chosun Ilbo newspaper reported Wednesday that U.S. spy satellites detected signs of steam at the North’s Yongbyon nuclear complex, an indication that it may have started reprocessing nuclear fuel.

The report, which could not be confirmed, quoted an unidentified government official. South Korea’s Yonhap news agency also had a similar report.

The move would be a major setback for efforts aimed at getting North Korea to disarm.

North Korea had stopped reprocessing fuel rods as part of an international deal. In 2007, it agreed to disable the Yongbyon reactor in exchange for aid and demolished a cooling tower at the complex.

The North has about 8,000 spent fuel rods which, if reprocessed, could allow it to harvest 13 to 18 pounds (six to eight kilograms) of plutonium — enough to make at least one nuclear bomb, experts said. North Korea is believed to have enough plutonium for at least a half dozen atomic bombs.

Further ratcheting up tensions, North Korea has test-fired five short-range missiles over the past two days, South Korean officials confirmed.

North Korea suggested that more missile tests could be planned, telling ships to stay away from waters off its west coast through Wednesday, according to South Korea’s coast guard.

The North’s moves have brought a wave of international reproach.

In New York, the U.N. Security Council is discussing a resolution that could include new sanctions.

Ambassadors from the five permanent veto-wielding council members — the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France — as well as Japan and South Korea are expected to meet again soon to work out the details.

Council members, after condemning the test on Monday, said they would follow up with a new legally binding resolution.

China and Russia, both allies of North Korea, slammed it for going ahead with the blast.

Moscow’s U.N. ambassador, Vitaly Churkin, who is also the Security Council president, said the 15-member body would begin work quickly on a new resolution, according to ITAR-Tass.

He declined to say if additional sanctions were discussed.

China also said it “resolutely opposed” the nuclear test. But it was unclear how far it would go in sanctioning its neighbor.

Experts said past sanctions have had poor results because they weren’t fully implemented and because North Korea is already one of the most isolated countries in the world.

Kim Sung-han, an international relations professor at Seoul’s Korea University, said U.N. resolution 1718, adopted after the North’s first nuclear test in 2006, has strong elements but has not been strictly observed.

He said the success of any sanctions would depend on how aggressively China implements them.

“It’s not going too far to say that China holds all keys in sanctions,” he said.

Details of Monday’s nuclear test may take days to confirm.

Russian defense officials said the blast was roughly as strong as the bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II and was stronger than North Korea’s first test in 2006. Other experts said that was probably an overestimate, and put the blast closer in strength to the first test.

North Korea seemed unconcerned by the condemnation.

A large crowd of Pyongyang residents, including senior military and party officials, gathered Tuesday in a stadium to celebrate the nuclear test.

Choe Thae Bok, a high-ranking party official, was quoted by North Korea’s official news agency as saying that the nuclear test “was a grand undertaking” to protect the country against “the U.S. imperialists’ unabated threat to mount a pre-emptive nuclear attack and (put) sanctions and pressure upon it.”

A North Korean newspaper, Minju Joson, said in a commentary Wednesday that Pyongyang does not fear repercussions.

“It is a laughable delusion for the United States to think that it can get us to kneel with sanctions,” it said. “We’ve been living under U.S. sanctions for decades, but have firmly safeguarded our ideology and system while moving our achievements forward.

The U.S. sanctions policy toward North Korea is like striking a rock with a rotten egg.”

North Korea test-fires two missiles: Posted on The Age-By Park Chan-Kyong-On May 26, 2009:

http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/north-korea-testfires-two-missiles-20090526-bkxy.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

“North Korea has fired two short-range missiles in a move set to heighten tensions after its latest nuclear weapons test drew global condemnation.

The UN Security Council held an emergency meeting to consider the options after Pyongyang’s test of a nuclear device on Monday, which some estimates said was almost as powerful as the atom bombs that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The Council called the test a “clear violation” of international law and immediately began working on a resolution that could impose new sanctions on the secretive North, which has now tested two nuclear bombs in three years.

“This resolution should include new sanctions in addition to those already adopted because such behaviour should have a cost and a price to pay,” said Jean-Pierre Lacroix, the deputy French ambassador to the United Nations.

Following the UN condemnation, the North launched one ground-to-air missile and one ground-to-ship missile into the sea on Tuesday off its eastern coast near the city of Hamhung, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency reported.

“Intelligence authorities are analysing the motives for the firing,” it quoted a South Korean government source as saying, adding that each missile had a range of 130km.

In April it test-fired a long-range rocket that critics say was in fact a ballistic missile, and on Monday it test-fired three short-range missiles after the nuclear blast.

Russia estimated the force of Monday’s underground nuclear explosion at up to 20 kilotons, far more powerful than the October 2006 test that announced the impoverished communist state had joined the club of world nuclear powers.

The North said the latest test would “contribute to defending the sovereignty of the country and the nation and socialism, and ensuring peace and security on the Korean peninsula and the region.”

North Korea has repeatedly said it needs a deterrent to ward off an attack by the United States, which it believes wants to topple Kim Jong-Il’s regime. Almost six years of disarmament talks have not stopped its nuclear drive.

Some analysts suggested Kim was using the nuclear test to strengthen his hand at home, and so could be even less swayed than usual by more sanctions or international criticism.

The 67-year-old was widely reported to have suffered a stroke last August, prompting speculation overseas about the succession. The North’s position has noticeably hardened since then.

“This is part of Kim shoring up support for his regime among the inner circle and the public,” Peter Beck, a Korea expert at the American University in Washington, told AFP.

“The internal domestic dynamic is taking precedence over external factors.”

Even China, a permanent member of the Security Council and the North’s sole main ally, was strongly critical of the latest test – which North Korea had pledged to carry out because of previous censure from the Council.

“Disregarding the common objections of the international community, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has again tested a nuclear device,” China’s foreign ministry said in a statement.

“The Chinese government expresses its resolute opposition to this,” it said.

US President Barack Obama, whose initial overtures to the North since taking office in January have been met with official hostility from Pyongyang, condemned what he called its “reckless” atomic test.

“North Korea’s nuclear ballistic missile programs pose a great threat to the peace and security of the world,” he said.

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said his government was “registering Australia’s deep concern at the North Korean test and registering further ways that we can work together to thwart North Korea’s future nuclear ambitions”.

“North Korea’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile program are an increasing threat to regional security, to Australia’s national security and to the wider international community,” he said.

“We must work with our friends around the region on this threat now, to ensure that this emerging threat is contained in the future.”

The North on Tuesday reiterated complaints that Obama was no better than his predecessor.

“The present US administration is talking about what it called a ‘change’ and ‘bilateral dialogue’ but it is, in actuality, pursuing the same reckless policy as followed by the former Bush administration to stifle the DPRK (North Korea) by force of arms,” said the ruling party newspaper Rodong Sinmun.

Foreign ministers from Asia and Europe meeting in Hanoi were set to condemn the nuclear test as “a clear violation” of six-party agreements and UN resolutions, according to a draft text.

South Korea announced it was joining the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative, an international effort to curb trade in weapons of mass destruction that involves some 90 nations and includes military exercises.

North Korea had previously said that it would see the South’s participation as a declaration of war.”

Could Iran Outsource an A-Bomb Test to N. Korea?: Blog Posted on China Confidential-By Confidential Reporter-On May 26, 2009:

http://chinaconfidential.blogspot.com/2009/05/could-iran-outsource-a-bomb-test-to-n.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this article:

‘Following North Korea’s test-firing of two more short-range missiles off its east coast on Tuesday, a reader asks if there is any truth to the rumor that North Korea conducted its second nuclear test for Iran–meaning, was the bomb made in Iran?

The answer, as far as we can tell, is no.

But the idea is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Unless it is stopped, Islamist Iran could one day outsource a nuclear weapon test to its Stalinist/Kimist ally.

Iran could also order up an atomic bomb and drop-ship it–literally–to the United States, using North Korea as a manufacturer and fulfillment center. Iran could arrange and pay for delivery of the weapon–to a U.S. coastal city by an Iranian or North Korean-controlled cargo ship flying a so-called flag of convenience.

Thousands of civilian vessels approach U.S. coastal waters daily; millions of containers are delivered annually; warhead-tipped missiles could be fired from such ships, using already tested, containerized launch systems; bombs could be smuggled into busy ports for detonation.

A relative handful of containers are inspected; and there is no defense against sea-based ballistic missile attacks, aimed at the cities or high above the country in an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack designed to wipe out the electric power grid and most electronics and communication systems.

In a move that indicates growing concern over the North Korean-Iranian nuclear threat, South Korea said Tuesday that it would join a U.S.-led initiative to intercept ships suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction.

China Confidential is the only media outlet to have accurately predicted both North Korean nuclear tests, including predicting the exact test dates. Using open source intelligence and an international network of volunteer stringers and analysts, China Confidential has consistently out-reported the mainstream media on the twin threats to world peace–nuclear-arming North Korea and nuclear-armed Iran.

POSTSCRIPT: Israeli defense experts are increasingly concerned about a possible EMP attack on the Jewish State. A knockout blow to electronic and communication systems could paralyze the country and allow for an all-out assault by Hezbollah, Hamas, and Syria with coordinated uprisings by radicalized Israeli Arabs.

In such a scenario, Iran could be responsible for the sneak attack–delivered by a foreign-flagged vessel–that could theoretically pave the way for the conquest of Israel while affording Iran a measure of plausible deniability.”

Note: These articles relate to and are pertinent to this disturbing issue-You Decide:

The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!

This blog contains articles from the Russian newspaper Pravda and the Russian’s view of what has been happening in America. Even the Russians can see the pathology! If these articles don’t put chills down your spine, then it confirms what the Russians are saying about Americans being a passive, hapless sheeple-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/the-russian-view-of-what-has-been-happening-in-america/

Pros & Con’s of The Bush Presidency Foreign Policy:

This blog contains an article that seems to give us the Pros and Cons of the Bush Presidency, as it relates to the Middle East Policy. Although, I agree that there were some Cons, like every other Presidency, I believe that the number one Pro was that we were never attacked here at home after the 9/11 tragedy, which says something about the “war on terror” policy-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/pros-con’s-of-the-bush-presidency-foreign-policy/

A 9/10 Security Mindset:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/a-910-security-mindset/

33 Minutes-Protecting America During New Missile Age:

This blog contains an eye-opening 96 page report, along with a 7-minute sneak peak trailer, reveal that a ballistic missile fired at the US could reach its target in thirty-three (33) minutes or less-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/33-minutes-protecting-america-during-new-missile-age/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act!

Question: Could it be true that there is a bill that was approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate for passage, that would prohibit federal employees of the executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence-legislation that at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama’s elusive birth certificate from release?

This blog reveals that there is such a bill awaiting passage by the Senate-You Decide:

The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act!

http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_The-Obama-birth-certificate-protection-act/BLOG/288747/78592.html

These are pertinent excerpts from this blog:

“WASHINGTON – A bill approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate would prohibit federal employees of the executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence–legislation at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama’s elusive birth certificate from release.

The legislation, HR985, resides in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Sovereignty Alliance has issued a “red alert” about the bill it calls “stealth legislation … to protect Obama from providing his birth certificate.” 


“It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if this were one of the intended consequences of this legislation,” said Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, who last week initiated a national billboard campaign to bring attention to the issue of Obama’s missing birth certificate and what it might say about his claim to be a “natural born citizen,” a status necessary to serving in the White House. 


“In any case, this bill puts the lie to this administration and this Congress being the most ethical and transparent in American history,” Farah said.

“They’re very open when it comes to the secrets of previous administrations, but when it comes to their own work, it is shrouded in secrecy. Even the president’s birth certificate and student records are well-guarded state secrets.”

More:

http://www.wnd.com/index….

Note: Something interesting happens when you attempt to go to the above WND web site-it is being blocked as “Invalid page access attempt”-wonder why-You Decide.

Link to Bill:

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/webreturn/?url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.985:

Note: These recent blogs are pertinent and relate to this issue-You Decide:

Is Being An Empathetic Liberal Minority The New Prerequisite for Being a Supreme Court Justice?

This blog contains articles that lay out Sonia Sotomayor’s controversial background experiences as a Private Practice Attorney and an Appeals Court Judge, which reveals that she:

• does not believe that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to individuals.
• believes that judges make policy;
• believes that Latinas are better than a white male who hasn’t lived that life (Best case scenario for reverse discrimination law suit?);
• believes that she can substitute her own policy preferences for what the law really is;
• believes that international law and policy should be considered in some court decisions; and,
• has been known to have a temperament on the bench which has been that of a “bully”, who is “abusive” to lawyers. (Guess this meets the empathetic requirement for appointment?)-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/is-being-an-empathetic-liberal-minority-the-new-prerequisite-for-being-a-supreme-court-justice/

Comment: I believe that the President is attempting to appoint someone with a radical background to the Supreme Court who can assist him in his cause of permanently sealing his elusive “birth certificate and other personal records” from the American Public-why?-You Decide.

President Obama’s Eligibility Status Press Release!

This blog contains a Press Release that I e-mailed to all News Media outlets and are shared with you in hopes that you will do the same, as a means of standing up for and defending our eroding “Constitutional Rights” under this President and his administration, that will ultimately destroy this great country of ours-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/

Letters & E-Mails Requesting President Obama’s Eligibility Status:

This blog contains copies of letters and/or emails that I have sent to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor-US Attorney for the District of Columbia, my US Congressman, US Senator and FBI Albuquerque Field Office and would like to share them with you, as a means of giving you some ideas of what action others could hopefully take to join this urgent, time sensitive and worthy cause, by standing up for and defending those rights given us under our Constitution-You Decide:

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/letters-e-mails-sent-requesting-president-obama’s-eligibility-status/

“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!